A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Another on LSA pricing



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 25th 05, 02:06 PM
GeorgeB
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Another on LSA pricing

Another point to consider on the "high" price of the new group of SLSA
aircraft is that those buying, examples being private pilots looking
(not) forward to the day thay can no longer maintain a medical and
FBOs using them for training and rental is ...

Many pilots will hold PPC with IA, and will want an airplane with
appropriate avionics and other equipment.

The FBO can rent these puppies for somewhat less than a Symphony,
Katana, or Liberty (what other new 2-place training suitable models
are in production?), but only if equipped as the renters would want.
For a Sport Pilot to have an overequipped plane would add to his
rental cost, but add much rental opportunity to the FBO. It would
also allow them to use these in RP and PP training, although older
Cessnas and Pipers (etc) may still be a lower cost option.

Perhaps the (current $) costs will drop SLIGHTLY after those wanting a
model fully equipped have purchased them. As others have pointed out,
barebones models have been advertised in the $60k range.

Ford and Chevy sell very few barebones equipped vehicles ... but they
can be ordered. Their used values seem to fall further and faster
than the moderately equipped brothers.

  #2  
Old September 26th 05, 12:15 AM
Kyle Boatright
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Morgans" wrote in message
...

"GeorgeB" wrote

Ford and Chevy sell very few barebones equipped vehicles ... but they
can be ordered. Their used values seem to fall further and faster
than the moderately equipped brothers.



I'll carry your illustration one step further.

If the need is for a bare bones work truck, the extras are not needed. If
you plan on deeping the barebones until the wheels fall off, the used
value
is of no importance.

The bare bones aspect can be a bonus, because if there are no extras to
break, there are no upkeep and repair costs for those missing items.
--
Jim in NC


No kidding about that. In general, it is the auxiliary systems on a vehicle
that cause its sale or retirement. I can't think of a single auto or truck
in my circle of family and friends that was retired because of a failed
engine or transmission. And we're talking about a people who know how to
squeeze lots of miles out of a vehicle. However, once power windows, door
locks, A/C, emission controls, expensive stereo's, sunroofs, alternators,
master cylinders, water pumps, and other auxiliaries start failing in
series, it's time to cut your losses...

KB


  #3  
Old September 26th 05, 12:22 AM
Willard
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I have been reading several topics commenting on the high cost of
SLSAs, and I don't think I've seen anything about the impact of the
weak dollar on the cost of the airframes. When the Light Sport
Aircraft idea first took hold, the Euro cost about $.85; now it's gone
up about 50%. Since all of the "modern" LSA designs are European, it's
no wonder the prices are astronomical. If the Euro still traded at
$.85, we'd be able to buy a very nice SLSA for about $60,000 (Rans
still advertizes an S-6ES for $57.500, but I have been told by a
company officer they have no intention of building this A/C.) Today,
it's more like $90.000 + avionics for the "serious" players. This
isn't all just greed driving these prices - it's international
economics!

  #4  
Old September 26th 05, 01:01 AM
Morgans
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"GeorgeB" wrote

Ford and Chevy sell very few barebones equipped vehicles ... but they
can be ordered. Their used values seem to fall further and faster
than the moderately equipped brothers.



I'll carry your illustration one step further.

If the need is for a bare bones work truck, the extras are not needed. If
you plan on deeping the barebones until the wheels fall off, the used value
is of no importance.

The bare bones aspect can be a bonus, because if there are no extras to
break, there are no upkeep and repair costs for those missing items.
--
Jim in NC

  #5  
Old September 26th 05, 03:15 AM
Morgans
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Willard" wrote

Today,
it's more like $90.000 + avionics for the "serious" players. This
isn't all just greed driving these prices - it's international
economics!


How true. Perhaps some US manufacturer will get up to speed, and make
something we (and the FBO's) can afford. I'm betting on Van's.
--
Jim in NC

  #6  
Old September 26th 05, 04:04 AM
bowman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Morgans wrote:

If the need is for a bare bones work truck, the extras are not needed. If
you plan on deeping the barebones until the wheels fall off, the used
value is of no importance.


When I bought my barebone F150 in 1986, I wasn't too concerned about resale
value. Drove it to town yesterday, and the wheels stayed put.




----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
  #7  
Old September 26th 05, 05:41 AM
Morgans
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"bowman" wrote

When I bought my barebone F150 in 1986, I wasn't too concerned about resale
value. Drove it to town yesterday, and the wheels stayed put.


Same with my '87 3/4 ton Chevy van. It has been rebuilt when necessary
(including a tranny 2 years ago at OSH) but after 265 K miles, it will still
do the heavy load pulling and carrying that I expect of it.

The same can apply to a LSA, (where the thread started) with a basic model
holding up to the rigors of training, and many hours of flying. They don't
have to have tons of bells and whistles, for a sport pilot. Go punch holes
in the sky, and practice maneuvers and landings, and sometimes go someplace.
No IFR stuff needed.
--
Jim in NC

  #8  
Old September 26th 05, 02:49 PM
bowman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Morgans wrote:

The same can apply to a LSA, (where the thread started) with a basic model
holding up to the rigors of training, and many hours of flying. They
don't have to have tons of bells and whistles,


There does seem to be a lot of expectations that don't seem to me to fit the
'sport' category. I learned on a Lark back in the '80s, and I think the
plane was old enough to vote. Pumping the brakes up on final is part of the
procedure, isn't it? I don't remember a bell and the whistle was the stall
warning.

It had navcoms that I could, in theory, use but other than for instruction
never did. Most of the time, I was just riding around northern Vermont
navigating by the lakes and mountains and thoroughly enjoying myself.

I lost interest, and many years later when I heard about the sport pilot
certificate my first though was 'that describes what I expect to do
perfectly' and it certainly doesn't require any more complexity that was
current in 1920.





----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pricing flight hours Andrew Gideon Owning 9 May 6th 05 11:41 PM
New Pricing David R Townend Home Built 0 January 2nd 05 03:20 AM
Aircraft Designations Book - Holiday Pricing David R Townend Restoration 0 December 15th 03 03:07 AM
Aircraft Designations Book -- Holiday Pricing David R Townend Rotorcraft 0 December 7th 03 03:17 AM
Aircraft Designations Book -- Holiday Pricing David R Townend Restoration 0 December 7th 03 03:17 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.