![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Another point to consider on the "high" price of the new group of SLSA
aircraft is that those buying, examples being private pilots looking (not) forward to the day thay can no longer maintain a medical and FBOs using them for training and rental is ... Many pilots will hold PPC with IA, and will want an airplane with appropriate avionics and other equipment. The FBO can rent these puppies for somewhat less than a Symphony, Katana, or Liberty (what other new 2-place training suitable models are in production?), but only if equipped as the renters would want. For a Sport Pilot to have an overequipped plane would add to his rental cost, but add much rental opportunity to the FBO. It would also allow them to use these in RP and PP training, although older Cessnas and Pipers (etc) may still be a lower cost option. Perhaps the (current $) costs will drop SLIGHTLY after those wanting a model fully equipped have purchased them. As others have pointed out, barebones models have been advertised in the $60k range. Ford and Chevy sell very few barebones equipped vehicles ... but they can be ordered. Their used values seem to fall further and faster than the moderately equipped brothers. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Morgans" wrote in message ... "GeorgeB" wrote Ford and Chevy sell very few barebones equipped vehicles ... but they can be ordered. Their used values seem to fall further and faster than the moderately equipped brothers. I'll carry your illustration one step further. If the need is for a bare bones work truck, the extras are not needed. If you plan on deeping the barebones until the wheels fall off, the used value is of no importance. The bare bones aspect can be a bonus, because if there are no extras to break, there are no upkeep and repair costs for those missing items. -- Jim in NC No kidding about that. In general, it is the auxiliary systems on a vehicle that cause its sale or retirement. I can't think of a single auto or truck in my circle of family and friends that was retired because of a failed engine or transmission. And we're talking about a people who know how to squeeze lots of miles out of a vehicle. However, once power windows, door locks, A/C, emission controls, expensive stereo's, sunroofs, alternators, master cylinders, water pumps, and other auxiliaries start failing in series, it's time to cut your losses... KB |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have been reading several topics commenting on the high cost of
SLSAs, and I don't think I've seen anything about the impact of the weak dollar on the cost of the airframes. When the Light Sport Aircraft idea first took hold, the Euro cost about $.85; now it's gone up about 50%. Since all of the "modern" LSA designs are European, it's no wonder the prices are astronomical. If the Euro still traded at $.85, we'd be able to buy a very nice SLSA for about $60,000 (Rans still advertizes an S-6ES for $57.500, but I have been told by a company officer they have no intention of building this A/C.) Today, it's more like $90.000 + avionics for the "serious" players. This isn't all just greed driving these prices - it's international economics! |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "GeorgeB" wrote Ford and Chevy sell very few barebones equipped vehicles ... but they can be ordered. Their used values seem to fall further and faster than the moderately equipped brothers. I'll carry your illustration one step further. If the need is for a bare bones work truck, the extras are not needed. If you plan on deeping the barebones until the wheels fall off, the used value is of no importance. The bare bones aspect can be a bonus, because if there are no extras to break, there are no upkeep and repair costs for those missing items. -- Jim in NC |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Willard" wrote Today, it's more like $90.000 + avionics for the "serious" players. This isn't all just greed driving these prices - it's international economics! How true. Perhaps some US manufacturer will get up to speed, and make something we (and the FBO's) can afford. I'm betting on Van's. -- Jim in NC |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Morgans wrote:
If the need is for a bare bones work truck, the extras are not needed. If you plan on deeping the barebones until the wheels fall off, the used value is of no importance. When I bought my barebone F150 in 1986, I wasn't too concerned about resale value. Drove it to town yesterday, and the wheels stayed put. ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "bowman" wrote When I bought my barebone F150 in 1986, I wasn't too concerned about resale value. Drove it to town yesterday, and the wheels stayed put. Same with my '87 3/4 ton Chevy van. It has been rebuilt when necessary (including a tranny 2 years ago at OSH) but after 265 K miles, it will still do the heavy load pulling and carrying that I expect of it. The same can apply to a LSA, (where the thread started) with a basic model holding up to the rigors of training, and many hours of flying. They don't have to have tons of bells and whistles, for a sport pilot. Go punch holes in the sky, and practice maneuvers and landings, and sometimes go someplace. No IFR stuff needed. -- Jim in NC |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Morgans wrote:
The same can apply to a LSA, (where the thread started) with a basic model holding up to the rigors of training, and many hours of flying. They don't have to have tons of bells and whistles, There does seem to be a lot of expectations that don't seem to me to fit the 'sport' category. I learned on a Lark back in the '80s, and I think the plane was old enough to vote. Pumping the brakes up on final is part of the procedure, isn't it? I don't remember a bell and the whistle was the stall warning. It had navcoms that I could, in theory, use but other than for instruction never did. Most of the time, I was just riding around northern Vermont navigating by the lakes and mountains and thoroughly enjoying myself. I lost interest, and many years later when I heard about the sport pilot certificate my first though was 'that describes what I expect to do perfectly' and it certainly doesn't require any more complexity that was current in 1920. ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Pricing flight hours | Andrew Gideon | Owning | 9 | May 6th 05 11:41 PM |
New Pricing | David R Townend | Home Built | 0 | January 2nd 05 03:20 AM |
Aircraft Designations Book - Holiday Pricing | David R Townend | Restoration | 0 | December 15th 03 03:07 AM |
Aircraft Designations Book -- Holiday Pricing | David R Townend | Rotorcraft | 0 | December 7th 03 03:17 AM |
Aircraft Designations Book -- Holiday Pricing | David R Townend | Restoration | 0 | December 7th 03 03:17 AM |