![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#61
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Lets put your freshly painted cardinal on the field next to a Cirrus any
Cirrus I might add and start asking people what they think looks better. I bet the Cardinal doesn't get one vote. "Longworth" wrote in message oups.com... jmho, Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. IMHO, the Cirrus can't hold a candle to the Cardinal when it comes to good look. Our Cardinal will the best looking plane on any field after its paint job ;-) Hai Longworth, a proud Cardinal owner. |
#62
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Aluckyguess" wrote in message ... I must be because they are a good looking plane. Definitely not better looking than the Cardinal. |
#63
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bumpy cowl, makes me think of a Cessna 195. another fine aircraft.
wrote in message oups.com... Stinson Reliant with a bump cowl |
#64
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Aluckyguess" wrote in message ... Lets put your freshly painted cardinal on the field next to a Cirrus any Cirrus I might add and start asking people what they think looks better. I bet the Cardinal doesn't get one vote. If I was there it would. "Longworth" wrote in message oups.com... jmho, Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. IMHO, the Cirrus can't hold a candle to the Cardinal when it comes to good look. Our Cardinal will the best looking plane on any field after its paint job ;-) Hai Longworth, a proud Cardinal owner. |
#65
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Aluckyguess wrote:
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message link.net... "Aluckyguess" wrote in message ... The Cherokee is a lot better looking than the Cardinal. jmho You're twisted. I must be because they are a good looking plane. Yes, compared to a Wilga. Matt |
#66
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Aluckyguess wrote:
Lets put your freshly painted cardinal on the field next to a Cirrus any Cirrus I might add and start asking people what they think looks better. I bet the Cardinal doesn't get one vote. "Longworth" wrote in message oups.com... jmho, Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. IMHO, the Cirrus can't hold a candle to the Cardinal when it comes to good look. Our Cardinal will the best looking plane on any field after its paint job ;-) Hai Longworth, a proud Cardinal owner. I bet it does. It would certainly get mine. The Cirrus is pretty plain vanilla looking. I find the curve of the tail partricularly ugly. Matt |
#67
|
|||
|
|||
![]() J-3 Cub! -- all the best, Dan Ford email: usenet AT danford DOT net Warbird's Forum: www.warbirdforum.com Piper Cub Forum: www.pipercubforum.com the blog: www.danford.net In Search of Lost Time: www.readingproust.com |
#68
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sylvain,
The DH88 was built in late 1933 or early 1934. The DC-1 had been built, as had the Boeing 247, both with retractable gear. I think the 247 had two position props, adjustable from in the cabin and the DC-2 had constant speed props (at least it did at some point). In fact, in the race to Australia, won by the DH88, third place was taken by a DC-2 of KLM (IIRC) operating on its normal airline schedule. Had it ignored the schedule, I think it might have won. So, the two position props on the DH88 seem a little odd in context. No matter how the systems were designed, it was one beautiful airplane. I recall seeing one, I assume a replica, in southern California several years ago, may have been at Riverside. All the best, Rick |
#69
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Aluckyguess wrote: Lets put your freshly painted cardinal on the field next to a Cirrus any Cirrus I might add and start asking people what they think looks better. I bet the Cardinal doesn't get one vote. Aluckyguess, What is your wager? Hey, I already got two votes from Dave and Matt eventhough my plane is still in the paint shop ;-) Hai Longworth |
#70
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Matt Whiting" wrote in message ... Aluckyguess wrote: Lets put your freshly painted cardinal on the field next to a Cirrus any Cirrus I might add and start asking people what they think looks better. I bet the Cardinal doesn't get one vote. "Longworth" wrote in message oups.com... jmho, Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. IMHO, the Cirrus can't hold a candle to the Cardinal when it comes to good look. Our Cardinal will the best looking plane on any field after its paint job ;-) Hai Longworth, a proud Cardinal owner. I bet it does. It would certainly get mine. The Cirrus is pretty plain vanilla looking. I find the curve of the tail partricularly ugly. Matt Not only that it's.....well.....plastic, yuck! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Most reliable homebuilt helicopter? | tom pettit | Home Built | 35 | September 29th 05 02:24 PM |
Engine Balancing and Resonance Vibration Problem | AllanFuller | Owning | 13 | September 12th 05 12:51 AM |
NTSB: USAF included? | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 10 | September 11th 05 10:33 AM |
Recovery parachutes again! | Cub Driver | Piloting | 35 | July 8th 05 12:47 AM |
Purchase a Info on Purchasing a Plane and Leasing Back to a School | pjbphd | Piloting | 3 | August 30th 04 02:10 AM |