EA-6B vs. Insurgents

The EA-6B and its USQ-113 jammer are proving surprisingly useful
against the
insurgents. See:

http://www.defensenews.com/story.php...7372&C=america

Though all the jamming and other emissions from Army IED jammers,
EA-6B's and
other sources, is causing an electromagnetic "pollution" problem. See:

http://aviationnow.com/avnow/news/ch...ws/11075p2.xml

wrote in message
oups.com...
The EA-6B and its USQ-113 jammer are proving surprisingly useful
against the
insurgents. See:

http://www.defensenews.com/story.php...7372&C=america

Though all the jamming and other emissions from Army IED jammers,
EA-6B's and
other sources, is causing an electromagnetic "pollution" problem. See:

http://aviationnow.com/avnow/news/ch...ws/11075p2.xml


Correction:

"WAS" useful against the insurgents. I'm sure after they read this, they'll
change their tactics......

In message 0Ibcf.1622$om5.617@dukeread04, John Doe
writes

wrote in message
roups.com...
The EA-6B and its USQ-113 jammer are proving surprisingly useful
against the
insurgents. See:

http://www.defensenews.com/story.php...7372&C=america

Though all the jamming and other emissions from Army IED jammers,
EA-6B's and
other sources, is causing an electromagnetic "pollution" problem. See:

http://aviationnow.com/avnow/news/ch...ws/11075p2.xml


Correction:

"WAS" useful against the insurgents. I'm sure after they read this, they'll
change their tactics......

Yeah, because they wouldn't notice what's happening around them, they've
never heard of force-protection ECM, they haven't been adapting their
TTPs all along, and only a stray post on Usenet tipped them off.

--
He thinks too much: such men are dangerous.
Julius Caesar I:2

Paul J. Adam MainBoxatjrwlynch[dot]demon{dot}co(.)uk