A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

My first 100 Bus hours- reflections on the A-320



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old December 2nd 05, 04:13 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default My first 100 Bus hours- reflections on the A-320

George Patterson wrote:
Looks like she's packing a pair of 38s to me.


Oh... 38s, I was thinking 357magnums or 44 magnums. Well they
certainly ARE magnums for sure. Well, maybe they could be 38 SPECIALS.

  #42  
Old December 2nd 05, 04:50 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default My first 100 Bus hours- reflections on the A-320

Morgans wrote:
"Ramapriya" wrote

er... to change directions in the air, Jim.
I hope it isn't another insinuation :\


No, No, No. Why does everyone think I am insinuating things. I'm really a
nice guy, to people who are nice to me. You have not been put in any other
category, by me.



Thanks, mate )


My question is why would the cargo use make the roll being different than a
passenger use? Also, I always thought excessive dihedral would just require
more rudder, and that it would return to level flight more easily.



But I've heard that it's the dihedral that causes difficulties in
banking heavy cargo airplanes, and that was how the anhedral concept
was thought up. I could be wrong )

Ramapriya

  #43  
Old December 2nd 05, 01:15 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default My first 100 Bus hours- reflections on the A-320

"Ramapriya" wrote
But I've heard that it's the dihedral that causes difficulties in
banking heavy cargo airplanes, and that was how the anhedral concept
was thought up. I could be wrong )


Ah....I bet that discussion dealt with "high" wing cargo planes where
all of the load is below the wing such as in the C-5 with its anhedral.
The same situation doesn't hold true for a "low" wing cargo plane where
most of the load is carried above the wing. :-) Long distance
communications is difficult....Eh?

Bob Moore
  #44  
Old December 2nd 05, 02:01 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default My first 100 Bus hours- reflections on the A-320

Bob Moore wrote:

Ah....I bet that discussion dealt with "high" wing cargo planes where
all of the load is below the wing such as in the C-5 with its anhedral.
The same situation doesn't hold true for a "low" wing cargo plane where
most of the load is carried above the wing. :-) Long distance
communications is difficult....Eh?

Bob Moore


Yep

Some difficulties with Skype installation here, Bob; apparently there's
a firewall against it by my ISP

I'm having an IT chap help me out with some 'port tunneling', whatever
that is...

Ramapriya

  #45  
Old December 2nd 05, 04:07 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default My first 100 Bus hours- reflections on the A-320


"Bob Moore" wrote in message

I'm betting that all of the A-380s wind-up in all cargo service. :-)

Bob Moore


I've had the same thought from time to time. A pax craft that size will
have niche applications, to be sure, but any broadbased passenger usage will
require extensive reworking of ground facilities. Not so to any great
extent for cargo. Just remote park, gross 'er out, and go!


  #46  
Old December 2nd 05, 08:29 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default My first 100 Bus hours- reflections on the A-320


"John Gaquin" wrote in message
...

"Bob Moore" wrote in message

I'm betting that all of the A-380s wind-up in all cargo service. :-)

Bob Moore


I've had the same thought from time to time. A pax craft that size will
have niche applications, to be sure, but any broadbased passenger usage
will require extensive reworking of ground facilities. Not so to any
great extent for cargo. Just remote park, gross 'er out, and go!


That's already been happening. Terminal three a London Heathrow has already
been upgraded to take the A380 with double deck docking stations and extra
strong taxiway and parking. Many of the airports on the routes to Asia from
Europe are or are nearly are A380 ready.

It would be a bit problem flying into the US. Its bad enough a 777 load of
passengers trying to get through immigration. By the time a load of A380
passengers got through the vacation would be over and its time to go home:-)


  #47  
Old December 2nd 05, 09:07 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default My first 100 Bus hours- reflections on the A-320

"Bushleague" wrote in message
At least the cabin crew won't bust you for being on "baby mins"!


Actually, we have an ops spec that relieves the high mins requirement as we
train Cat III.

Lots more seats than our carrier who are you with?


The other guys.. :-)
I don't disclose too many details on Usenet because of the loons. Make some
changes to the reply address and send me an e-mail. I used to fly with some
of your senior pilots in previous jobs.

D.


  #48  
Old December 4th 05, 12:57 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default My first 100 Bus hours- reflections on the A-320

Us Airways

On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 20:06:08 GMT, "Capt.Doug"
wrote:

"Flyingmonk" wrote in message
Nice post Capt. Thanks for sharing. What is your route? Overseas?
West Coast? East Coast?...


Seniority is good, if you're at the top. I end up going throughout the
system. I prefer the Caribbean routes but many times don't have a choice.

D.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Most reliable homebuilt helicopter? tom pettit Home Built 35 September 29th 05 02:24 PM
Mini-500 Accident Analysis Dennis Fetters Rotorcraft 16 September 3rd 05 11:35 AM
millionaire on the Internet... in weeks! Malcolm Austin Soaring 0 November 5th 04 11:14 PM
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons Curtl33 General Aviation 7 January 9th 04 11:35 PM
AmeriFlight Crash C J Campbell Piloting 5 December 1st 03 02:13 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.