![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The forward-looking strategic planning of a powerless-flight
organization facing challenges similar to those of sailplane organizations makes for interesting reading for those concerned with the future of our sport - it can be downloaded from: http://ozreport.com/docs/USHGASTRATEGICPLAN10.10.pdf To identify critical issues for the USHGA future, they hired a consulting service to guide and keep them focussed, went through weekly meetings capped by a two-day intensive session, and came up with specific actions (including estimated costs in money and time). For those unfamiliar with the the USHGA, it has around 12,000 members (about same as SSA) but with falling HangGlider membership, til-now partially compensated by a growing ParaGlider segment. Like the SSA they are volunteer-based and put out a magazine (80 pages vice the SSA's 60) but also handle their sport's licensing requirements and monitor their launch/land sites. Jack |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Slightly off topic but related to the health of the USHGA...
Interestingly for those of us that race.....the fees to enter a USHGA contest are several times higher than for sailplanes (SSA)....something like $750 (including tows). Can't imagine that is helping encourage pilots to enter contests. Casey Lenox KC Phoenix |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At 04:36 12 December 2005, Jack Glendening wrote:
The forward-looking strategic planning of a powerless-flight organization facing challenges similar to those of sailplane organizations makes for interesting reading for those concerned with the future of our sport - it can be downloaded from: http://ozreport.com/docs/USHGASTRATEGICPLAN10.10.pdf To identify critical issues for the USHGA future, they hired a consulting service to guide and keep them focussed, went through weekly meetings capped by a two-day intensive session, and came up with specific actions (including estimated costs in money and time). For those unfamiliar with the the USHGA, it has around 12,000 members (about same as SSA) but with falling HangGlider membership, til-now partially compensated by a growing ParaGlider segment. Like the SSA they are volunteer-based and put out a magazine (80 pages vice the SSA's 60) but also handle their sport's licensing requirements and monitor their launch/land sites. Jack Buried way back on page 58 of their 59-page document they pretty well sum up their direction with the following statement. PG is replacing HG—HG was the king, the king is dead—long live the king. PG & PPG will dominate the future of USHGA & this may keep HG alive. For the uninformed HG (Hangglider), PG (Paraglider) and PPG (Powered Paraglider). Having been a Charter member of USHGA I find it more than sad that parachutes will now be leading USHGA. What a great solution! I would rather see it close. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
KC -- why are the fees so much higher? Do they have an expense to cover
that we don't? ~tuno |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've been following this and the resulting divisiveness.
The only way an all encompassing organization might thrive (IMVHO) would be a national, division based organization, something akin to the EAA, with divisions, each with its own periodicals. United States Soaring Association USSA with divisions for sailplanes, hanggliders, and paragliders and perhaps other subcategories. I don't expect to see this. Frank Whiteley |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jack Glendening wrote:
snip For those unfamiliar with the the USHGA, it has around 12,000 members (about same as SSA) but with falling HangGlider membership, til-now partially compensated by a growing ParaGlider segment. Like the SSA they are volunteer-based and put out a magazine (80 pages vice the SSA's 60) but also handle their sport's licensing requirements and monitor their launch/land sites. I haven't read the report, but the 12,000 USHGA membership size is disturbing. Remember how sailplane pilots used imagine hang gliding did so well compared to sailplanes was because it was a much cheaper sport without the FAA licensing requirements, and you could fly just about anywhere since you didn't need an airport? On the other, some this was a myth. Hang glider pilots that have converted to sailplanes have told me it was cheaper for them to fly and own sailplanes, took less time and effort to get more flying, didn't injure them so frequently, and their spouses thought it was a huge improvement. Even so, perhaps the obvious differences between the sports weren't the cause of membership retention, and the difficulty in increasing membership (in both sports) may have causes external to the sports. If this true, efforts to reduce costs and add convenience may only slow the loss of members, and what is needed is a fundamental change to the sports, instead of tweaking some of the factors involved. I know I'm not the first to suggest this, and no, I don't have clue about what to do, either. -- Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly Eric Greenwell Washington State USA |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message oups.com... KC -- why are the fees so much higher? Do they have an expense to cover that we don't? ~tuno Not sure 2NO. From what I can gather so far they have opted to pay a single person to organize and set up most of their contests. The pilots I spoke with did not have knowledge of any budget or expense sheets for any prior contests being published. It would be nice to not have to worry about organizing all of our contests and if the money were available certainly would be worth paying someone to travel the US each year to do that. On the other hand it would appear at least theoretically to be more expensive that relying upon local volunteer help at each site. As best as I can gather the pilots and USHGA have opted to do the former. It just seems to me that some pilots are in hang gliding vs. sailplanes (at least part of the reasons) due to limited funds and that these types of entry fees are certainly keeping the numbers of contestants down. I don't wish to imply that someone is embezzling funds.....the organizers may in fact be making minimum wage and the cash may be spent on many other things (e.g. trophies, meals, housing tow pilots, insurance, etc). It is a bunch of money though......I'm told that there are around 60 contestants per contest so that's $45,000 USD per contest in entry fees. My interest is that I've got a close friend that competes. They don't think that the fees are high but I'm not sure that many of them know what we pay in our sport. I'm probably just worrying too much about someone elses business as usual. Casey |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
BTW, one eye-opener (or head-shaker, perhaps) is their aspiration to
double their membership every decade! |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Eric Greenwell wrote:
[snip] Remember how sailplane pilots used imagine hang gliding did=20 so well compared to sailplanes was because it was a much cheaper sport = (...). It seems that the cost in any amateur sport or hobby tends to increase = to a limit defined by the average available income in the specific = country/society. Therefore, serious participation may involve comparable = levels of committment and expense, be it in models gliders, = hang-gliding, sailplanes (or target shooting, potholing, scuba diving, = alpinism, whatever...) Notwithstanding, the barriers to entry are lower in HG and PG than in = soaring. Regards, F. Almeida |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Francisco De Almeida wrote:
Eric Greenwell wrote: [snip] Remember how sailplane pilots used imagine hang gliding did=20 so well compared to sailplanes was because it was a much cheaper sport = (...). It seems that the cost in any amateur sport or hobby tends to increase = to a limit defined by the average available income in the specific = country/society. Therefore, serious participation may involve comparable = levels of committment and expense, be it in models gliders, = hang-gliding, sailplanes (or target shooting, potholing, scuba diving, = alpinism, whatever...) Notwithstanding, the barriers to entry are lower in HG and PG than in = soaring. And yet, at least in the USA, they have the same number of members in their national organizations. I expected there would be a lot more HG/PG members. Perhaps (again, in the USA) the barriers for HG/PG aren't as low as we imagine. Maybes some sailplane pilots that also hang-glider pilots can inform us of the realities. -- Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly Eric Greenwell Washington State USA |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What is Sikorskys Vision for Future Rotorcraft? | CTR | Rotorcraft | 5 | April 26th 05 05:27 PM |
Vision aircraft (2nd try) | Rick Pellicciotti | Home Built | 1 | October 23rd 04 08:15 PM |
Modifying Vision plans for retractable gear... | Chris | Home Built | 1 | February 27th 04 09:23 PM |
Navy eyes new aviation vision | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 19th 03 10:50 PM |
A Vision 1st Flight Today! | Scott VanderVeen | Home Built | 4 | October 6th 03 02:02 AM |