![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
To All:
Removal of the FAA AFS-800 Part 61 and 141 FAQ web site Last month the FAA cancelled the AFS-800 Part 61 and Part 141 FAQ's. Evidently the reason was because the FAA Public Relations folks, the creator of the FAA's main "How do I become a Pilot?" FAQ web page convinced the FAA Administrator and AFS-1 that there didn't need to be two different FAQ web sites within the FAA's various web pages. This, of course, completely misses the point as to the main purpose of the AFS-800 Part 61 and 141 FAQ's. For years, the Part 61 and Part 141 FAQ's have been an internet extension of the old FAA Pilot Examiner BBS from the 80's and early 90's which were maintained by AFS-600. These FAQ's have served an essential and valuable function providing DPE's, ASI's, CFI's and everyone in the flying public with timely and valuable information about Parts 61, 141, SFAR 73 and certification & regulation policy and issues. While the FAA's web page "How do I become a pilot..." FAQ's serves the public adequately for general aviation questions, they are totally inadequate and completely miss the mark for providing the above-referenced groups accurate and timely information about specific issues surrounding Parts 61 and 141. A lot of work has gone into the AFS-800 Part 61 and 141 FAQ's and they need to be preserved and continue to be accessible to the public. The FAA Administrator and Director of Flight Standards need to be made aware of the significant adverse impact removing the Part 61 and 141 FAQ's will have on the FSDO's, DPE's, CFI's and anyone else who is interested in proper interpretation of FAA policy and compliance with Parts 61 and 141. Just a few reasons to reinstate the AFS-800 Part 61 and Part 141 FAQ web site: 1. The AFS-800 Part 61 and 141 FAQ web site provides valuable guidance to the flying public and FAA FSDO's on day-to-day application of the Parts 61 and 141 of the FAR's. It provides standardization to not only pilots and CFI's, but also to FSDO's. It's a good way to get most of the FSDO's marching to the beat of the same drummer with certification issues. 2. The existing AFS-800 Part 61 and 141 FAQ web site database has already answered thousands of questions from airmen, CFI's, Pilot Examiners and FSDO Inspectors. Absent this online resource and database, it will again occupy thousands of extra hours of agency time to re-research and answer these same questions as they come up again and again. That would be a waste of agency resources and a waste of taxpayer's dollars. 3. The FAQ database has helped to promote compliance with the FAR's on Part 61 and 141 issues, thereby promoting increased aviation safety. 4. Omitting the Part 61 and Part 141 FAQ web site will now only increase the burden on FSDO's to answer questions about application of Parts 61 and 141. Some FSDO's take forever to answer questions and often when an inspector is done putting his 'spin' on the issue, the answer later proves to be wrong compared to a legal opinion or AFS-800's answer. Absent that useful Part 61 FAQ web site, such questions will either now go unanswered, or the time spent answering them will detract from other safety-related functions of FSDO personnel. Likewise, absent the AFS-800 Part 61 and 141 FAQ's, there will be no central, official Flight Standards web site to provide such guidance pertinent to certification issues. FAA AGC-1 legal resources will also be burdened by increased solicitation of legal opinions on issues that can be, or already have been easily answered by the Part 61 and Part 141 FAQ's. 5. The AFS-800 Part 61 and 141 FAQ web site has become the single, most useful and reliable resource for authoritative information about Parts 61 and 141. AFS-800 wrote the rules. Why not let them keep answering the questions about what they meant ... by reinstating the Part 61 & 141 FAQ's! People to contact about your concerns regarding removal of the AFS-800 Part 61 and 141 FAQ web site: Marion C. Blakey AOA-1 FAA Administrator 800 Independence Avenue SW - Room 1010 Washington, DC 20591 202-267-3111, 202-267-5047 FAX email: James J. Ballough AFS-1 Director, Flight Standards Service 800 Independence Avenue SW - Room 821 Washington, DC 20591 202-267-8237, 202-267-5230 FAX email: Whether you agreed with the FAQ answers or not, they WERE useful to resolve 61 & 141 issues. If you are concerned about removal of the AFS-800 Part 61 and 141 FAQ web site, please contact the above individuals regarding your concerns. An email is too easy to ignore. A fax or snail-mail letter would have more impact on either recipient. Please take the time to make the above individuals aware of your concerns. Thanks! - Antique Examiner |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Mini-500 Accident Analysis | Dennis Fetters | Rotorcraft | 16 | September 3rd 05 11:35 AM |
BergFalke II/55 part. | Bruce Greeff | Soaring | 2 | May 12th 04 02:32 PM |
commercial privileges | Gary Drescher | Piloting | 32 | February 27th 04 02:42 AM |
The Internet public meeting on National Air Tour Standards begins Feb. 23 at 9 a.m. | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 0 | February 22nd 04 03:58 PM |
Part 91 Commercial Glider Rides to be Outlawed? | Vaughn | Soaring | 9 | October 27th 03 09:26 PM |