![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#81
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message news ![]() On Sun, 08 Jan 2006 05:02:33 GMT, George Patterson wrote: In the absence of some catastrophe, such as a bent pushrod, this is generally caused by not flying enough. The layer of hardened steel on a camshaft is fairly thin. Let the plane sit long enough, and rust will form. When the engine starts again, the rust is worn away, making the thin layer of hardened steel thinner. The worst wear points, of course, are the tips of the lobes. Once the hardened steel wears through, the softer steel underneath goes pretty rapidly. The automotive world tried out roller lifters a long time ago. They would work fine in aircraft engines too. I've heard that some of the engines built for the homebuilt market can and do incorporate roller lifters. I even thought I read that at least one company was intending to certify such an engine. Corky Scott It is not uncommon to see roller rockers on round engines. |
#82
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#83
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Longworth" wrote in message
ups.com... Pete, I have read and participate in r.a.s for the last few years. The newsgroup is not 'restricted' to primary students. I never said it was. Please don't put words in my mouth. It does nothing to support your point, and makes you look dishonest. [...] Any perceived problem with cross postings of on-topic subject is quite insignificant in comparison to the numerous off topic, thread hijacking branching out to politic and religious discussions seen at rec.avatiation newgroups! Your statement is quite ironic, given how this thread got hijacked into a r.a.owning issue ("engine making metal"). IMHO, that's a perfect illustration why excessive cross-posting is such a problem (never mind the divergent threads that wouldn't be on-topic in any rec.aviation.* newsgroup). Your other statements are classic slippery-slope logic. The fact is, lots of topics would be of possible interest to many if not all of the people who frequent the various rec.aviation.* newsgroups. Unfortunately for your argument, that's not justification for posting messages on those topics. Pete |
#84
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pete,
My post is in reference to several points that you made below. Regarding thread hijacking, I don't have problems with thread branching out to other topics. Using google, at least the branch was labeled Engine making metal. It is not the same as branching or hijacking to non-aviation related discussions on politics and religions. I think I have sufficiently expressed my opinion on cross postings and off-topic subject and do not wish to engage in any further discussions here to conserve bandwidth. Hai Longworth ================================================== ========================= Weather is taught to VFR primary students, why not icing? Because they have enough to learn already? Seriously though, a primary student's knowledge of icing need not extend much further than "don't fly when freezing rain is forecast". For extra credit, a short discussion of what causes freezing rain might be called for. Most icing occurs inside a cloud, and VFR pilots should not have to worry about that, or anything else that might happen inside a cloud. But more importantly (and more to the point) the r.a.student newsgroup is more about the process of learning to fly, and especially as it applies to primary students ..... Pete |
#85
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pete,
I do not wish to engage in any disputes with you. I use single quotation mark around the word 'restricted' and not double quotation mark. According to this website http://www.grammartips.homestead.com...ationmark.html " single quotation marks for words that are not actual quotations but that are being set off for some other reason" I just simply expressed my opinion that Jim's post is appropriate in rec.aviation.student group. Hai Longworth |
#86
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Longworth" wrote in message
oups.com... Pete, I do not wish to engage in any disputes with you. That clearly is false. I use single quotation mark around the word 'restricted' and not double quotation mark. Well, if there were some official specification that prohibited the use of single quotation marks for quotation here on Usenet, that might make a difference. In any case, whether you are literally quoting or simply mischaracterizing what I wrote, it's "putting words into my mouth". According to this website http://www.grammartips.homestead.com...ationmark.html " single quotation marks for words that are not actual quotations but that are being set off for some other reason" Wonderful. When you get that standard to be the official policy on Usenet, you let me know. I just simply expressed my opinion that Jim's post is appropriate in rec.aviation.student group. No, you did more than that. Pete |
#87
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nice tap dance there Pete, but she's got you cold on that one!
Suggest you stop blaming her for your misinterpretation of what she wrote. -- Cheers, John Clonts Temple, Texas N7NZ |
#88
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Get over it, Mr. Duniho......you are all wet! Move on....
On Mon, 9 Jan 2006 13:52:59 -0800, "Peter Duniho" wrote: "Longworth" wrote in message roups.com... Pete, I do not wish to engage in any disputes with you. That clearly is false. I use single quotation mark around the word 'restricted' and not double quotation mark. Well, if there were some official specification that prohibited the use of single quotation marks for quotation here on Usenet, that might make a difference. In any case, whether you are literally quoting or simply mischaracterizing what I wrote, it's "putting words into my mouth". According to this website http://www.grammartips.homestead.com...ationmark.html " single quotation marks for words that are not actual quotations but that are being set off for some other reason" Wonderful. When you get that standard to be the official policy on Usenet, you let me know. I just simply expressed my opinion that Jim's post is appropriate in rec.aviation.student group. No, you did more than that. Pete |
#89
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jim Macklin" wrote in message news:7ilwf.41026$QW2.13106@dukeread08... I'll buy that, always best to use specific data rather than a generic answer. It takes a pretty good eye and tach to see 5 rpm. Sure does. And a digital tach may flicker that much. Sometimes it is called a "barely perceptible rise". Some say it is easier to observe a rise in MP than such a small RPM rise, and that is borne out by my observation. The MP will rise one to two inches, and the MP gauge seems to be more stable than the tach. If the mixture is set to spec, it is not necessary to lean for ground ops, since it is already lean enough to prevent plug fouling. Ground leaning is effective only if leaned back to the edge of idle cutoff, anyway. The Lycoming manual doesn't seem to have any tables for adjusting RPM rise for density altitude. If it is leaned to the 5RPM rise spec at a high altitude airport, I wonder if it might be too lean at a low-altitude airport, with no way to enrichen it. Stan |
#90
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I flew a demo in a BE 58P Baron into a high altitude
private strip in the Wyoming mountains, A-A Ranch Airport is an airport in Carbon County, Wyoming. It has an elevation of 7,880 feet. With the Continental fuel injection, being the mechanical constant displacement type, the engines died when they were set to idle during the landing because they were too rich and then turbos had spun down. This was a problem because the runway looked like a ski-jump and I was half way up the hill. I was able to hold the brakes and get it started again and manually leaned the mixture to about 1/2 travel on the lever and taxi up the hill to the level ramp area. Of course you have to keep it full rich in case of a go-around, so I learned a lesson that was not in the manual, as soon as touching down, mixture reduce, throttle reduce. For take-off run up to 2000 RPM then full rich. I much preferred the Bendix injection because it is metered by ambient fuel and air pressure, so the mixture is more stable and self-leaning. I love the PT6 even better. -- James H. Macklin ATP,CFI,A&P -- The people think the Constitution protects their rights; But government sees it as an obstacle to be overcome. some support http://www.usdoj.gov/olc/secondamendment2.htm See http://www.fija.org/ more about your rights and duties. "Stan Prevost" wrote in message ... | | "Jim Macklin" wrote in message | news:7ilwf.41026$QW2.13106@dukeread08... | I'll buy that, always best to use specific data rather than | a generic answer. It takes a pretty good eye and tach to | see 5 rpm. | | | | Sure does. And a digital tach may flicker that much. Sometimes it is | called a "barely perceptible rise". | | Some say it is easier to observe a rise in MP than such a small RPM rise, | and that is borne out by my observation. | The MP will rise one to two inches, and the MP gauge seems to be more stable | than the tach. | | If the mixture is set to spec, it is not necessary to lean for ground ops, | since it is already lean enough to prevent plug fouling. Ground leaning is | effective only if leaned back to the edge of idle cutoff, anyway. | | The Lycoming manual doesn't seem to have any tables for adjusting RPM rise | for density altitude. If it is leaned to the 5RPM rise spec at a high | altitude airport, I wonder if it might be too lean at a low-altitude | airport, with no way to enrichen it. | | Stan | | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Nasa Icing courses | Jim Burns | Piloting | 96 | February 1st 06 04:16 AM |
ASRS/ASAP reporting systems - how confidential? | Tim Epstein | Piloting | 7 | August 4th 05 05:20 PM |
NASA Icing Course | [email protected] | Piloting | 3 | December 28th 04 05:18 PM |
About Acellerated Courses for Private | Dudley Henriques | Piloting | 137 | July 22nd 04 04:21 AM |
FAA letter on flight into known icing | C J Campbell | Instrument Flight Rules | 78 | December 22nd 03 07:44 PM |