![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Conductivity for a hunk of metal 62 mils thick by quarter inch wide by a
foot long where you measure resistance in the micro-ohms means absolutely nothing -- copper, brass, or aluminum. On the other hand, corrosion means a lot -- like steel hardware on aluminum, no matter how good the plating on the steel. Jim "ELIPPSE" wrote in message oups.com... Brass has substantially less conductivity than copper. Aluminum has less conductivity than copper, but has twice the conductivity per pound. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "RST Engineering" wrote in message ... Conductivity for a hunk of metal 62 mils thick by quarter inch wide by a foot long where you measure resistance in the micro-ohms means absolutely nothing -- copper, brass, or aluminum. On the other hand, corrosion means a lot -- like steel hardware on aluminum, no matter how good the plating on the steel. \ All good points. So, what is it that you are trying to say , in regards to which material should be used, and which to stay away from? -- Jim in NC |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I said that I much prefer what is called a barrier strip terminal block, and
whether you get it at The Shack, Mouser, Digikey, etc. is immaterial. However, if you are going to roll your own, I prefer brass, as it corrodes a lot less than either copper or aluminum. Jim "Morgans" wrote in message ... "RST Engineering" wrote in message ... Conductivity for a hunk of metal 62 mils thick by quarter inch wide by a foot long where you measure resistance in the micro-ohms means absolutely nothing -- copper, brass, or aluminum. On the other hand, corrosion means a lot -- like steel hardware on aluminum, no matter how good the plating on the steel. \ All good points. So, what is it that you are trying to say , in regards to which material should be used, and which to stay away from? -- Jim in NC |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Morgans wrote:
"RST Engineering" wrote in message ... Conductivity for a hunk of metal 62 mils thick by quarter inch wide by a foot long where you measure resistance in the micro-ohms means absolutely nothing -- copper, brass, or aluminum. On the other hand, corrosion means a lot -- like steel hardware on aluminum, no matter how good the plating on the steel. \ All good points. So, what is it that you are trying to say , in regards to which material should be used, and which to stay away from? I took what he was saying to be that the difference in conductivity between the materials mentioned for the size piece in question isn't a factor worth worrying about. Compatibility with the connectors is much more important as any galvanic corrosion between the connector and the buss bar will cause substantially more resistance than will the difference in buss bar material. So pick the buss bar material which is most compatible with your connector material. Matt |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "RST Engineering" wrote in message .. . I said that I much prefer what is called a barrier strip terminal block, and whether you get it at The Shack, Mouser, Digikey, etc. is immaterial. However, if you are going to roll your own, I prefer brass, as it corrodes a lot less than either copper or aluminum. I take, then, the terminal block (if it is what I am thinking of) will require individual wires with terminals crimped onto them, to make the connection with the individual breakers, or fuses? -- Jim in NC |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]() RST Engineering wrote: Conductivity for a hunk of metal 62 mils thick by quarter inch wide by a foot long where you measure resistance in the micro-ohms means absolutely nothing -- copper, brass, or aluminum. On the other hand, corrosion means a lot -- like steel hardware on aluminum, no matter how good the plating on the steel. Jim "ELIPPSE" wrote in message oups.com... Brass has substantially less conductivity than copper. Aluminum has less conductivity than copper, but has twice the conductivity per pound. All power substations use aluminum bar conductors. The trick with aluminum conductors is that you must apply something like NO-OXID or Vaseline to the conductor, abraid it with steel wool or crocus cloth, then, leaving the grease in place, fasten the conductors together using Belleville washers. Aluminum starts to oxidize immediately when cleaned, so the grease seals the surface from air. The spring washers apply the 1500 psi contact force that assures very low resistance, and also allows for the difference in thermal expansion rates between the steel fasteners and the aluminum. For instance, 1/8" X 1" 6063-T5 aluminum, such as in the Macklinburg-Duncan display at your hardware store, has the same conductivity as AWG 0-1 OFHC copper but at half the weight and much less cost. That's how I made my two 8' battery conductors in my Lancair that go from the battery in the baggage compartment to the engine. This method was given us by Alcoa in putting in the ground grid for our radar and computers in the Atlas Guidance system. Rocket Science! |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "ELIPPSE" wrote For instance, 1/8" X 1" 6063-T5 aluminum, such as in the Macklinburg-Duncan display at your hardware store, has the same conductivity as AWG 0-1 OFHC copper but at half the weight and much less cost. That's how I made my two 8' battery conductors in my Lancair that go from the battery in the baggage compartment to the engine. What did you use for insulation, on the positive bar? -- Jim in NC |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi, Jim! First off, remember its a fiberglass plane. I ran one bar down
each side of the fuselage and put one layer of fiberglass over each. Another way would be to put in one bar, fiberglass over it, put the second conductor over top of the first, then fiberglass over that. That construction yields a good-quality distributed-capacitance for transient suppression, and the two close-together conductors give good EMI cancellation. Paul |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "ELIPPSE" wrote Hi, Jim! First off, remember its a fiberglass plane. I ran one bar down each side of the fuselage and put one layer of fiberglass over each. \\ Good idea. I'm not a glass kind of guy, so I might not have thought of that. -- Jim in NC |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Source for PA28-180 split master switch | Mike Noel | Owning | 3 | October 5th 05 02:29 AM |
Master Jet Base | MICHAEL OLEARY | Naval Aviation | 24 | April 22nd 05 07:00 AM |
Premade master and circuit breaker panel | Corky Scott | Home Built | 6 | March 19th 04 02:18 PM |
ANG Woman Wing Commander Doesn't See Herself as Pioneer, By Master Sgt. Bob Haskell | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | March 18th 04 08:40 PM |
Need G-103 Acro Master Cylinder | Ray Lovinggood | Soaring | 5 | September 30th 03 03:39 AM |