![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Picked up the mail today & found yet another catalog from an aviation
supplier. Flipped it open & landed on a page with a variety of safety wire pliers. The usual assortment, long & short, auto return, special long reach types, etc. Then it struck me, one model of 9" fairly standard design pliers was offered in both a right hand twist and a left hand twist. No other difference. Why? I can't imagine what difference it could possibly make. Daniel |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Daniel" wrote in message
om... Picked up the mail today & found yet another catalog from an aviation supplier. Flipped it open & landed on a page with a variety of safety wire pliers. The usual assortment, long & short, auto return, special long reach types, etc. Then it struck me, one model of 9" fairly standard design pliers was offered in both a right hand twist and a left hand twist. No other difference. Why? I can't imagine what difference it could possibly make. When you are wiring two bolt heads together, such as prop bolts, the first one is twisted one direction and the second one is twisted the other. If you only have one set of pliers, you use the automatic twist feature to make the long twist between bolts. Then the short, final twist at the other side of the second bolt is done by hand in the opposite direction. The advantage is the wire which goes around the bolt head stays in place. Doing it the other way tend to move the wire so it crosses the top of the bolt head. A bit difficult to visualize, but a bit of practice will make it clear. Rich S. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That is true ,..and please add in some Repair manuals if the left or right
hand is is called for IT HAS TO BE DONE or it will not pass FAA. "Rich S." wrote in message ... "Daniel" wrote in message om... Picked up the mail today & found yet another catalog from an aviation supplier. Flipped it open & landed on a page with a variety of safety wire pliers. The usual assortment, long & short, auto return, special long reach types, etc. Then it struck me, one model of 9" fairly standard design pliers was offered in both a right hand twist and a left hand twist. No other difference. Why? I can't imagine what difference it could possibly make. When you are wiring two bolt heads together, such as prop bolts, the first one is twisted one direction and the second one is twisted the other. If you only have one set of pliers, you use the automatic twist feature to make the long twist between bolts. Then the short, final twist at the other side of the second bolt is done by hand in the opposite direction. The advantage is the wire which goes around the bolt head stays in place. Doing it the other way tend to move the wire so it crosses the top of the bolt head. A bit difficult to visualize, but a bit of practice will make it clear. Rich S. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"paddydix" wrote in message
nk.net... That is true ,..and please add in some Repair manuals if the left or right hand is is called for IT HAS TO BE DONE or it will not pass FAA. No need to shout, Paddy. I won't add that bit of advice because this is the homebuilt newsgroup. An aircraft certificated under the Experimental Amateur built class need not comply with a repair manual. You can glue your nuts on using Barge's All Purpose Sealer if'n you want. Rich "Mebbe I should rephrase that???" S. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
--snip-- Doing it the other
way tend to move the wire so it crosses the top of the bolt head. I wish we had a left-handed set when I was working the flight deck on the USS Kennedy. I used to reach in (arms length) and wire several cannon plugs that could only be seen with an inspection mirror. UGH! Larry AECS (AW/SW/MTS) Disabled Combat Veteran USN Retired 20 years of Navy in my rear view mirror and getting further away every day ;-) "Rich S." wrote in message ... "Daniel" wrote in message om... Picked up the mail today & found yet another catalog from an aviation supplier. Flipped it open & landed on a page with a variety of safety wire pliers. The usual assortment, long & short, auto return, special long reach types, etc. Then it struck me, one model of 9" fairly standard design pliers was offered in both a right hand twist and a left hand twist. No other difference. Why? I can't imagine what difference it could possibly make. When you are wiring two bolt heads together, such as prop bolts, the first one is twisted one direction and the second one is twisted the other. If you only have one set of pliers, you use the automatic twist feature to make the long twist between bolts. Then the short, final twist at the other side of the second bolt is done by hand in the opposite direction. The advantage is the wire which goes around the bolt head stays in place. Doing it the other way tend to move the wire so it crosses the top of the bolt head. A bit difficult to visualize, but a bit of practice will make it clear. Rich S. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rich S. wrote ...
When you are wiring two bolt heads together, such as prop bolts, the first one is twisted one direction and the second one is twisted the other. ...The advantage is the wire which goes around the bolt head stays in place. Doing it the other way tend to move the wire so it crosses the top of the bolt head. A bit difficult to visualize, but a bit of practice will make it clear. Thanks! Found some good visuals in AC43.13-1B (where I should have looked in the first place). Chapter 7 Section 7. For those who want to look it up & don't have it, the AC is available in Word format at: http://av-info.faa.gov/dst/43-13/ And if you don't have Word, you can get the free Word Viewer at: http://office.microsoft.com/download...wd97vwr32.aspx Daniel |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I wish we had a left-handed set when I was working the flight deck on the
USS Kennedy. I used to reach in (arms length) and wire several cannon plugs that could only be seen with an inspection mirror. UGH! Larry AECS (AW/SW/MTS) Disabled Combat Veteran USN Retired 20 years of Navy in my rear view mirror and getting further away every day ;-) I worked on F-4E and other mangles that had the same problem. The engineering people never heard of locking cannon plugs. The shock mount people aren't clever either. I can think of a few that required serious contortions to safety. Dan, U. S. Air Force, retired |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
B2431 wrote:
I wish we had a left-handed set when I was working the flight deck on the USS Kennedy. I used to reach in (arms length) and wire several cannon plugs that could only be seen with an inspection mirror. UGH! Larry AECS (AW/SW/MTS) Disabled Combat Veteran USN Retired 20 years of Navy in my rear view mirror and getting further away every day ;-) I worked on F-4E and other mangles that had the same problem. The engineering people never heard of locking cannon plugs. The shock mount people aren't clever either. I can think of a few that required serious contortions to safety. Dan, U. S. Air Force, retired Dan, Which version of E did you work on? I worked for a year at Hill AFB on the Slat Mod line. Did you ever put the INS Can in the RO's console? Bill Higdon |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dan,
Which version of E did you work on? I worked for a year at Hill AFB on the Slat Mod line. Did you ever put the INS Can in the RO's console? Bill Higdon Geeze, that's back in 1978 - 1980, Hahn AB, 50 FW. We had TISEO and non TISEO. I don't recall what blocks they were. The INS platform was no thrill, but having to change the battery was worse. My theory is they hung 4 ropes from a ceiling, suspended an engine from each of the first two, the CADC from the third and battery from the fourth. Then they built the aircraft around them. Dan, U. S. Air Force, retired |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
B2431 wrote:
Dan, Which version of E did you work on? I worked for a year at Hill AFB on the Slat Mod line. Did you ever put the INS Can in the RO's console? Bill Higdon Geeze, that's back in 1978 - 1980, Hahn AB, 50 FW. We had TISEO and non TISEO. I don't recall what blocks they were. The INS platform was no thrill, but having to change the battery was worse. My theory is they hung 4 ropes from a ceiling, suspended an engine from each of the first two, the CADC from the third and battery from the fourth. Then they built the aircraft around them. Dan, U. S. Air Force, retired Sounds about right for Old McDonnells pig farm :), I hated to work on them. Bill Higdon |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
I Wanna Build an Aeroplane | Badwater Bill | Home Built | 71 | August 19th 03 02:24 PM |