![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wrong!
Lean of peak horsepower =14.9 x fuel flow Lean of peak ONLY and it's not % but straight hp Karl "Curator" N185KG |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "karl gruber" wrote in message oups.com... Wrong! Lean of peak horsepower =14.9 x fuel flow Lean of peak ONLY and it's not % but straight hp What Temp LOP? There's a wide berth. And what's you calculation? |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
How did you find the 3 bladed prop to perform. Many in the Mooney
community seem to believe the 3 blade prop reduces cruise speed by about 5 knots. I believe that's only for the four cylinder models. The six cylinder ones (as is Vince's 231) do not suffer any loss of cruise speed. --- Ken Reed N9124X |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Doug" wrote in message oups.com... You genearlly need 300 horse to see an improvement in performance with a 3 blade prop. Really? |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ken Reed" wrote in message news ![]() How did you find the 3 bladed prop to perform. Many in the Mooney community seem to believe the 3 blade prop reduces cruise speed by about 5 knots. I believe that's only for the four cylinder models. The six cylinder ones (as is Vince's 231) do not suffer any loss of cruise speed. AIUI, the earlier three blade props were not optimal for higher HP/displacement engines...not like he current stable. Also, you could run higher RPMs with a three blade that, with a two blade prop, would could unsuitable noise and vibration. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dan Luke" wrote in message ... "Matt Barrow" wrote: How did you find the 3 bladed prop to perform. Many in the Mooney community seem to believe the 3 blade prop reduces cruise speed by about 5 knots. Supposedly a myth. Members of Cardinal Flyers have reported cruise speed losses after conversion to 3-blades. Some have reported ROC improvements and less noise. The consensus runs against the conversion being worth it. Since "consensus" is a political term, rather than a scientific term, I'd be more impressed by real test data rather than subjective opinions :~) |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If you're too ashamed to post asking price and location, don't even
bother posting. Vince wrote: I have a 1984 Mooney M20K 231 for sale. 2483 TTSN, 1415 SFRM. Dual Garmin 430s. Please see http://www.madness.net/n57568 for specifications and tons of pictures, and email me directly with any questions. Thanks for looking! Vince |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
One main advantage of more blades is that you can use more power for
the same prop diameter and construction. Each blade handles a portion of the total thrust-power. In a two blade there is about 0.5/0.333 - 1 == 50% more stress per blade due to thrust - for same engine power. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]() -----Original Message----- From: abripl ] Posted At: Friday, February 24, 2006 6:09 PM Posted To: rec.aviation.owning Conversation: 1984 Mooney M20K 231 for sale Subject: 1984 Mooney M20K 231 for sale One main advantage of more blades is that you can use more power for the same prop diameter and construction. Each blade handles a portion of the total thrust-power. In a two blade there is about 0.5/0.333 - 1 == 50% more stress per blade due to thrust - for same engine power. [Jim Carter] Isn't one feature of the 3 blade prop a smaller diameter that provides better ground clearance? And are you really using more power? Isn't number of blades related to torque applied to the crankshaft? The engine doesn't change power output based on the number of blades its swinging does it? I know that smaller diameters tend to mean lower tip velocity and less noise for the same amount of torque, but I've never heard more blades means more power used before. But then, I could be wrong...it wouldn't be the first time and it probably won't be the last. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Asking price is $149k, located at ISP, NY. Offers of course are welcome.
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Landing a Mooney | Jon Kraus | Owning | 42 | November 16th 04 07:00 PM |
Landing a Mooney | Jon Kraus | Piloting | 42 | November 9th 04 07:53 PM |
Landing a Mooney | iain_hutchison | Piloting | 0 | November 4th 04 02:38 PM |
Mooney M20 K on Grass ? | Andrew Boyd | Owning | 0 | August 13th 04 03:00 PM |
Loading luggage in other than Mooney | Robert M. Gary | Piloting | 21 | June 28th 04 06:23 PM |