![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Anybody here use them? Care to share a PIREP?
Age and ignorance has caught up with me. I'm due for my next medical in April and I'm trying to decide between the BTE or ITE model. Oh, that's behind-the-ear or in-the-ear. I'm in a trial period and can choose between them. Both models have a switch position that allows electromagnetic pickup from the headsets to prevent feedback. In either case, they effectively block out more sound in that mode -- like the stall warning indicator. That's no big deal, I haven't been able to hear that for the last couple years anyway with the headset on. The ITE seems more convenient since I don't snag the little plastic tube that loops over the top of the ear and into the ear canal, but it feels like I'm walking around with a banana in each ear most of the time. The BTE, like I said, gets snagged now and then but they aren't affected as much by wind noise when walking in the open. They are only a little more comfortable, but slightly harder to maintain. Which ones do you use? Pros? Cons? The ignorance part in the first paragraph was not knowing about hearing protection when I was on competitive rifle and pistol teams in the USMC -- and working in the 3rd Marine Air Wing. All prior to 1964. Don't ask my age. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't use them, but do consider getting them for both ears. I've
found that stereo hearing makes a huge difference in intellegibility. When I get an ear infection and lose partial hearing in just one ear, it is surprising how much is lost overall. Jose -- Money: what you need when you run out of brains. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Casey: I use the "in the canal" type. I understand it is less
effective at high frequencies, etc but it works well with a headset, no feedback problems. Your audiologist should have some input in the decision. You will get used to the "banana in the ear" feeling. Leo. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
As an added comment. I have a friend who tried the ITE hearing aids and
found they bothered him too much to wear them. He recently got BTE aids and really likes them. Also he still has lots of hair and it covers the external aid behind his ear and looks great. In my case (being bald) I wouldn't like to wear those since they would really show up. I'm naturally almost completely bald and my chemotherapy took the rest. Since my Non-Hodgkins Lymphoma of the bone marrow (Agent Orange/Vietnam) is in remission some has returned but I just keep it all shaved. -- Darrell R. Schmidt B-58 Hustler History: http://members.cox.net/dschmidt1/ - "Casey Wilson" N2310D @ gmail.com wrote in message news:YHIJf.899$0z.533@trnddc01... Anybody here use them? Care to share a PIREP? Age and ignorance has caught up with me. I'm due for my next medical in April and I'm trying to decide between the BTE or ITE model. Oh, that's behind-the-ear or in-the-ear. I'm in a trial period and can choose between them. Both models have a switch position that allows electromagnetic pickup from the headsets to prevent feedback. In either case, they effectively block out more sound in that mode -- like the stall warning indicator. That's no big deal, I haven't been able to hear that for the last couple years anyway with the headset on. The ITE seems more convenient since I don't snag the little plastic tube that loops over the top of the ear and into the ear canal, but it feels like I'm walking around with a banana in each ear most of the time. The BTE, like I said, gets snagged now and then but they aren't affected as much by wind noise when walking in the open. They are only a little more comfortable, but slightly harder to maintain. Which ones do you use? Pros? Cons? The ignorance part in the first paragraph was not knowing about hearing protection when I was on competitive rifle and pistol teams in the USMC -- and working in the 3rd Marine Air Wing. All prior to 1964. Don't ask my age. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've had ITE hearing aids for years. In my case it was initially just a
volume problem. Later it was also a problem distinguishing words even though I could hear the sound OK. My first 2 sets were the teensy ones that are almost invisible since they fit deeply in the ear. I recently got larger ones from the VA that, although they are ITE type, they are much larger than my first 2 and are more visible from the side view. The doctor said the larger one was necessary to enclose more devices to allow me to distinguish words. But as for flying, I remove them. With a headset I am able to control the volume quite well and have no problem flying without my hearing aids. I also remove them when using my iPod since they block insertion of the ear buds. -- Darrell R. Schmidt B-58 Hustler History: http://members.cox.net/dschmidt1/ - "Casey Wilson" N2310D @ gmail.com wrote in message news:YHIJf.899$0z.533@trnddc01... Anybody here use them? Care to share a PIREP? Age and ignorance has caught up with me. I'm due for my next medical in April and I'm trying to decide between the BTE or ITE model. Oh, that's behind-the-ear or in-the-ear. I'm in a trial period and can choose between them. Both models have a switch position that allows electromagnetic pickup from the headsets to prevent feedback. In either case, they effectively block out more sound in that mode -- like the stall warning indicator. That's no big deal, I haven't been able to hear that for the last couple years anyway with the headset on. The ITE seems more convenient since I don't snag the little plastic tube that loops over the top of the ear and into the ear canal, but it feels like I'm walking around with a banana in each ear most of the time. The BTE, like I said, gets snagged now and then but they aren't affected as much by wind noise when walking in the open. They are only a little more comfortable, but slightly harder to maintain. Which ones do you use? Pros? Cons? The ignorance part in the first paragraph was not knowing about hearing protection when I was on competitive rifle and pistol teams in the USMC -- and working in the 3rd Marine Air Wing. All prior to 1964. Don't ask my age. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 18 Feb 2006 17:20:56 GMT, "Casey Wilson" N2310D @ gmail.com
wrote: Anybody here use them? Care to share a PIREP? I only fly right seat with a couple of friends. I wear BTE. They are useless with the headset; the headset blocks the microphones ("transducers" in the hearing aid terminology). I use a Lightspeed Twenty 3G. With my loss and the level control on them, I do very well with my aids in my pocket. Age and ignorance has caught up with me. I'm due for my next medical in April and I'm trying to decide between the BTE or ITE model. With ANR headsets, I suspect, but don't know, that ITE will work. Remember that the ANR function uses time for sound to travel to cancel with phase shift (I think) and the eardrum is the sense point. Both models have a switch position that allows electromagnetic pickup from the headsets to prevent feedback. In either case, they effectively block out more sound in that mode -- like the stall warning indicator. That's no big deal, I haven't been able to hear that for the last couple years anyway with the headset on. I've found the EM pickup mode useless. YMMV. The BTE, like I said, gets snagged now and then but they aren't affected as much by wind noise when walking in the open. They are only a little more comfortable, but slightly harder to maintain. I liked the BTE for my needs because they are available with 3 transducers and better noise cancellation; I do much work in industrial plants and use them in lieu of hearing protection; they work, but are not OSHA legal. FWIV, the batteries (cells) are larger and last longer. I decided that the visibility of them did not bother me. I was talking to a hearing aid fitter who tole me about a new product you might like; it is far more open (minimal "occlusion" if I remember correctly is the term he used). It has 2 disadvantages; for MY wants, thereis no outside blocking, and it cannot handle as much gain as a traditional earmold BTE. Another BTE plus is that if your hearing gets worse, they can be set to higher gain than ITE, ITC, or CIC aids. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Casey,
Please post your decision as I was in USAF prior to 64 as a jet engine mech and as I remember (if correctly) we have what is known as a high noise impediment. Outside noise surrounding us decreases our ability to comprehend the spoken word at different times depending on the amount and volume of noise. "Casey Wilson" N2310D @ gmail.com wrote in message news:YHIJf.899$0z.533@trnddc01... Anybody here use them? Care to share a PIREP? Age and ignorance has caught up with me. I'm due for my next medical in April and I'm trying to decide between the BTE or ITE model. Oh, that's behind-the-ear or in-the-ear. I'm in a trial period and can choose between them. Both models have a switch position that allows electromagnetic pickup from the headsets to prevent feedback. In either case, they effectively block out more sound in that mode -- like the stall warning indicator. That's no big deal, I haven't been able to hear that for the last couple years anyway with the headset on. The ITE seems more convenient since I don't snag the little plastic tube that loops over the top of the ear and into the ear canal, but it feels like I'm walking around with a banana in each ear most of the time. The BTE, like I said, gets snagged now and then but they aren't affected as much by wind noise when walking in the open. They are only a little more comfortable, but slightly harder to maintain. Which ones do you use? Pros? Cons? The ignorance part in the first paragraph was not knowing about hearing protection when I was on competitive rifle and pistol teams in the USMC -- and working in the 3rd Marine Air Wing. All prior to 1964. Don't ask my age. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Have you tried them with a headset? a few years ago when I still wore a
hearing aid (I have cochlear implant now), I got feedback whenever a headphone was NEAR it. You'll get used to the feeling of them being in your ear, just like you'll get used to wearing shoes, for example (you do, dont you? ![]() John |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() " wrote in message ... Casey, Please post your decision as I was in USAF prior to 64 as a jet engine mech and as I remember (if correctly) we have what is known as a high noise impediment. Outside noise surrounding us decreases our ability to comprehend the spoken word at different times depending on the amount and volume of noise. Hi Paul, You put your finger on the mechanics of the hearing loss. Too bad we didn't know better, back then. In 1967, at a physical for my second job out of the USMC, the doctor said I should apply for a disability. Couldn't see the point of it -- and still don't. I owe a lot to the Corps. Since I've had an opportunity to do a good comparison between the BTE and ITE styles, I've decided on the BTE. The ITE, in my opinion for what that's worth, suffers from: (1) even a moderate breeze induces a ROARING wind noise; (2) I can't use my cell phone with them; (3) bone conduction noise while eating anything with more texture than mashed potatoes totally blocks out conversation at the dinner table [don't even think about potato chips!]; (4) battery usage is about double that of BTE [that is probably a battery size issue]; (5) after three weeks, I haven't gotten over the "banana-in-the-ear" syndrome. At an attempt at objectivity, I will say the BTE is not without problems: (1) getting the ear bud placed in the ear canal takes more effort [if placed wrong it can cause lots of feedback and/or press uncomfortabley on the eardrum]; (2) the transducer/amplifier unit is easier to dislodge [read snag the little tube]; the ear tubes require, believe it or not, more periodic cleaning; (3) moisture wicking "socks" on the headset interfere with a comfortable fit [not a big problem, but nonetheless...]. Thanks to the entire RAP community for your comments. By the way, I intend to leave the hearing aids off for the day before and day of my next physical and see if I can still hear the "normal conversation behind my back from six feet." Regards, Casey Wilson Freelance Writer and Professional Photographer |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Casey Wilson" N2310D @ gmail.com wrote in message news:YHIJf.899$0z.533@trnddc01... Anybody here use them? Care to share a PIREP? Age and ignorance has caught up with me. I'm due for my next medical in I am in the same position and I use ITE.I find they work well with my David Clarks but not with telephones. The bananna in the ear feeling goes away in a rather short time. There are no hearing aids that I have found that will ever match your natural hearing.If anyone finds one please let me know. Best of luck and let us know the outcome. Bob Barker N8749S |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Instructors With Hearing Impairment | Roy Bourgeois | Soaring | 0 | March 14th 04 08:27 PM |
Instructors With Hearing Impairment | Roy Bourgeois | Soaring | 1 | March 13th 04 11:34 PM |
Instructors With Hearing Impairment | Roy Bourgeois | Soaring | 0 | March 13th 04 11:00 PM |
AFMC pilot initiative aids test, operational worlds | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | February 19th 04 12:01 AM |
Science, technology highlighted at hearing | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | July 23rd 03 10:30 PM |