Physics Professor's Peer Reviewed Paper on WTC CONTROLLED DEMOLITIONS on 9/11

TRUTH wrote:
Tenured Physics Professor Steven E Jones gave two seminars to hundreds of
people on WTC controlled demolitions and how the government's version of
events "defies physics". The Feb 1st seminar can be viewed on Google
Video, or downloaded to your computer.


The following is a excerpt from Jones' PEER REVIEWED paper:

Yes. And the peers laughed hysterically. Jones is the laughing stock of
academe right now.

So, your argument boils down to this:

1) It is too difficult for people on board the plane to fly it into a
building, so the CIA must have done it by remote control. sorry, but I
am having trouble typing while laughing hysterically and slapping my
knees

2) Nevertheless, it was not airplanes that destroyed the WTC but
controlled demolitions. It must have been difficult drilling all those
holes in the building and installing demolitions and wires and such for
months preparing for all this without a single solitary soul noticing
it.

3) And all this as a pretext to invade Afghanistan (whatever for? to
control the non-existent oil pipeline there?) and Iraq (from which not
a solitary drop of oil has flowed into the coffers of anyone in the
US). Never mind that the reasons for invading Iraq had almost nothing
to do with 9/11. Most on both sides of the aisle at the time believed
that Iraq had or was developing WMDs, notwithstanding that this belief
was partially based on faulty intelligence and mitigated by the fact
that Iraq's own military establishment seems to have also believed it.
Indeed, the "yellow cake" affair from which the Plame scandal grew
appears now to have been completely vindicated; Iraq really was trying
to buy yellow cake uranium. It turned out that Wilson simply dismissed
the allegation without investigating it all -- which, as a government
agent, you would think he would have been high on the list of people
trying to start the war.

Frankly, "TRUTH," you need to change your handle: to LIAR.