Video of THERMITE REACTION at WTC on 9/11

excerpt from Dr Jones paper:
http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html


Dramatic footage reveals yellow-to-white hot molten metal dripping from the
South WTC Tower shortly before its collapse:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...54740145858863
&q=cameraplanet+9%2F11. The yellow color implies a molten-metal
temperature of approximately 1000 oC, evidently above that which the dark-
smoke hydrocarbon fires in the Towers could produce. If aluminum (e.g.,
from the plane) had melted, it would melt and flow away from the heat
source at its melting point of about 650 oC and thus would not reach the
yellow color observed for this molten metal. Thus, molten aluminum is in
fact ruled out with high probability. But molten iron with the
characteristics seen in this video is consistent with a thermite-reaction
attacking the steel columns in the Tower, thus weakening the building just
prior to its collapse, since thermite produces molten iron at yellow-to-
white hot temperatures. (As some of the molten metal hits the side of the
building in the video clip above, note that the white-hot interior is
exposed.) The reader may wish to compare the dripping molten metal
observed on the corner of the South Tower just before its collapse with the
dripping molten metal from known thermite reactions:
http://www.checktheevidence.com/911/Thermite2.htm

"Wake UP!" wrote:

The yellow color implies a molten-metal
temperature of approximately 1000 oC, evidently above that which the dark-
smoke hydrocarbon fires in the Towers could produce. If aluminum (e.g.,
from the plane) had melted, it would melt and flow away from the heat
source at its melting point of about 650 oC and thus would not reach the
yellow color observed for this molten metal. Thus, molten aluminum is in
fact ruled out with high probability.

Bullcrap. Molten aluminum at about 1,100 to 1,200 F glows yellow
nicely, and if it was dribbling downward from where it was melting, you
would see much the same effect as in those photos.

"Scott M. Kozel" wrote in
:

"Wake UP!" wrote:

The yellow color implies a molten-metal
temperature of approximately 1000 oC, evidently above that which the
dark- smoke hydrocarbon fires in the Towers could produce. If
aluminum (e.g., from the plane) had melted, it would melt and flow
away from the heat source at its melting point of about 650 oC and
thus would not reach the yellow color observed for this molten metal.
Thus, molten aluminum is in fact ruled out with high probability.

Bullcrap. Molten aluminum at about 1,100 to 1,200 F glows yellow
nicely, and if it was dribbling downward from where it was melting,
you would see much the same effect as in those photos.



If what you say is true, then consider emailing Dr Jones with your evidence
and he will certainly update his paper

Occam's Razor. Look it up.


"Wake Up!" wrote in message
...
"khobar" wrote in news:kZBQf.392$PE.376@fed1read05:

"Keith W" wrote in message
...

"Wake UP!" wrote in message
...
Video of THERMITE REACTION at WTC on 9/11
http://www.checktheevidence.com/911/Thermite.htm


I've seen and used thermite and thats not it, by the way you are
aware that thermite isnt used to demolish buildings arent you ?

Yes he is, but that's the beauty of his conspiracy - since thermite
isn't used for demolition, no one would suspect it being used. Har har
har de har har.

Paul Nixon





As if that means anything, or has any bearing whatsoever. (I guess to a
reality denier it might.) Can thermite partially evaporate steel? Yes.
Could thermite cause the temperatures that existed in metal at the WTC?
Yes. Can thermite cause metal dripping like in the videos? Yes. Were
those three items present at the WTC? Yes. I love the way you deniers
aren't able to take everything into context, and instead give silly
reasons for each and every piece of information, so you can hold on to
your absurd government conspiracy theory. LOL!!

Wake Up! wrote:

If what you say is true, then consider emailing Dr Jones with your evidence
and he will certainly update his paper

LOL
It isn't too difficult for Dr Jones to actually research this himself

mrtravel wrote in
. com:

Wake Up! wrote:

If what you say is true, then consider emailing Dr Jones with your
evidence and he will certainly update his paper

LOL
It isn't too difficult for Dr Jones to actually research this himself




Obviously, he did.

Wake Up! wrote:

mrtravel wrote in
. com:


Wake Up! wrote:


If what you say is true, then consider emailing Dr Jones with your
evidence and he will certainly update his paper

LOL
It isn't too difficult for Dr Jones to actually research this himself


Obviously, he did.

And yet he still came to the wrong conclusions, as did you

In article ,
on Sun, 12 Mar 2006 01:17:53 GMT,
Wake Up! attempted to say .....



As if that means anything, or has any bearing whatsoever. (I guess to a
reality denier it might.) Can thermite partially evaporate steel? Yes.
Could thermite cause the temperatures that existed in metal at the WTC?
Yes. Can thermite cause metal dripping like in the videos? Yes. Were
those three items present at the WTC? Yes.

Really, so you have PROOF of it I guess ?

I love the way you deniers aren't able to take everything into context, and instead give silly
reasons for each and every piece of information, so you can hold on to
your absurd government conspiracy theory. LOL!!

It is called science.
Examine the facts and come to conclusions.

You might try it some time

--
When dealing with propaganda terminology one sometimes always speaks in
variable absolutes. This is not to be mistaken for an unbiased slant.

excerpt from Dr Jones' paper regarding experiment performed:
http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html


We also noted that while a steel pan holding the aluminum glowed red and
then yellow hot, the molten aluminum inside retained its silvery-gray
color, adding significantly to the evidence that the yellow-white molten
metal dripping from the South Tower shortly before its collapse was NOT
molten aluminum. (Recall also that the yellow color of the molten metal
(video clip above) implies a temperature of approximately 1100 oC -- too
high for the dark-smoke hydrocarbon fires burning in the building.) This
is point worth emphasizing: aluminum has low emissivity and high
reflectivity, so that in daylight conditions molten aluminum will appear
silvery-gray, while molten iron (with its characteristic high emissivity)
will appear yellow-white (at ~1100 oC) as observed in the molten metal
dirpping from the South Tower just before its collapse

Tank Fixer wrote in
k.net:

In article ,
on Sun, 12 Mar 2006 01:17:53 GMT,
Wake Up! attempted to say .....



As if that means anything, or has any bearing whatsoever. (I guess to
a reality denier it might.) Can thermite partially evaporate steel?
Yes. Could thermite cause the temperatures that existed in metal at
the WTC? Yes. Can thermite cause metal dripping like in the videos?
Yes. Were those three items present at the WTC? Yes.

Really, so you have PROOF of it I guess ?


Of course not. That's why 20 yr experienced Physics Professor Steven
Jones PhD calls his paper a hypothesis.





I love the way you deniers aren't able to take everything into
context, and instead give silly reasons for each and every piece of
information, so you can hold on to your absurd government conspiracy
theory. LOL!!

It is called science.
Examine the facts and come to conclusions.

You might try it some time


You obviously don't know the illogical/unrealistic steps the government
took to "prove" their absurd claims. You should consider looking into it
before commenting. Start by reading and understanding Jones' paper. Not
taking the time to do this demonstrates a predetermination to consider
controlled demolitions at the WTC implausible and not worth examining.
And if that's the case, I need not spend time responding further.

http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html