![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I just read a description of the limitations imposed on light sport
pilots, including the following: no flights into Class A airspace, which is at or over 18,000' MSL; no flights into Class B, C, or D airspace unless you receive training and a logbook endorsement; and no flights above 10,000' MSL. It looks like taxiing is the only safe bet. If someone was to ask, "Well, what can the sport pilot do," what would be the answer? AJ |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Almost anything in day/VFR with one passenger. The Class
BCD airspace endorsement is not too hard to do, a student pilot may also do those areas solo. Most light aircraft do not fly above 10,000 feet. You can learn and do aerobatics, fly cross-country,fly land and seaplanes or skis, airplanes, helicopters. -- James H. Macklin ATP,CFI,A&P -- The people think the Constitution protects their rights; But government sees it as an obstacle to be overcome. some support http://www.usdoj.gov/olc/secondamendment2.htm See http://www.fija.org/ more about your rights and duties. "AJ" wrote in message oups.com... |I just read a description of the limitations imposed on light sport | pilots, including the following: no flights into Class A airspace, | which is at or over 18,000' MSL; no flights into Class B, C, or D | airspace unless you receive training and a logbook endorsement; and no | flights above 10,000' MSL. It looks like taxiing is the only safe | bet. | | If someone was to ask, "Well, what can the sport pilot do," what | would be the answer? | | AJ | |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks to Jim and Morgans for the replies. I'm not a troll (physical
appearances aside), and the question was an honest one. Thanks for the honest answers -- they helped a great deal. AJ |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "AJ" wrote in message oups.com... I just read a description of the limitations imposed on light sport pilots, including the following: no flights into Class A airspace, which is at or over 18,000' MSL; no flights into Class B, C, or D airspace unless you receive training and a logbook endorsement; and no flights above 10,000' MSL. It looks like taxiing is the only safe bet. If someone was to ask, "Well, what can the sport pilot do," what would be the answer? This sounds all too much like a troll, but I'll play. Fly anywhere you want to, with relatively simple signoffs, as long as you don't go really high, like most single engine piston pilots don't do, anyway. Fly in VFR conditions, like most single engine piston pilots prefer, anyway. Fly smaller sized aircraft, with speeds limited to what many single engine piston planes will never go faster than, anyway. Fly around with a buddy, which around 50% or more pilots of single engine piston airplanes don't exceed, anyway. Fly in a new single engine piston aircraft, with many models costing from 50 to 85 thousand dollars. Try buying a new non-sport airplane for anywhere near that cost. Fly in the daytime only, which 75% or more single engine piston flights are, anyway. So, in a paraphrase of a very old Wendy's add, "Where's the beef?" You can do most of what the majority of pilots of single engine piston airplanes do. Less cost, newer equipment possible, less training. If you don't like the limitations and can pass a medical, go for the full ticket. Sport pilot is still a great thing for a great many people , who due to a technicality, can not pass a medical, or don't want to spend the money to pass a medical. -- Jim in NC |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"AJ" wrote in message
oups.com... If someone was to ask, "Well, what can the sport pilot do," what would be the answer? The "no flights into Class B, C, or D" restriction is not much of a restriction at all since, as you already noted, it can be removed with some training. Basically, a Sport Pilot can do practically all of the kinds of flying that many people who never stray far from home and just enjoy local sightseeing and $100 hamburger flights. I used to use airplanes for lots of long-distance traveling, but frankly in the last few years very little of my flights could not have been done under a Sport Pilot certificate. I know lots of pilots who are similar. Beyond that, it provides a much more effective stepping stone to the Private Pilot certificate than the Recreational certificate did. Dan Ford notwithstanding, few pilots found the Recreational certificate to be a useful route to take, given how little they trimmed from the Private in terms of training requirements for it. Pete |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Macklin wrote:
You can learn and do aerobatics, fly cross-country,fly land and seaplanes or skis, airplanes, helicopters. if I am not mistaken you can fly rotorcraft, but not helicopters, i.e., you are limited to the gyroplane class in this category. But then may be I misunderstood the new FARs (quite a different style from the rest of the regulations); anyone? --Sylvain |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "AJ" wrote in message oups.com... Thanks to Jim and Morgans for the replies. I'm not a troll (physical appearances aside), and the question was an honest one. Thanks for the honest answers -- they helped a great deal. Great. Honestly, there are some compromises that you give up, with SP. To me, wanting to go cross country, not being able to fly at night is a problem. Other than that, the limitation is with the plane. One of the biggest limitations with the plane, as I see it, is the limitation of the powerplant. There are not a lot of choices out there, to keep the airframe at a reasonable weight, and give it a reasonable useful load. If only they had given us a couple hundred pounds more! Of course, you could play the "if only" game, about many of the limitations, but "it is what it is." What it really comes down to is, it give a lot of people a chance to get their feet off of the ground, that might have not been able to, any other way. All of the trade-offs seem very reasonable, at that point! -- Jim in NC |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You may be correct, I said helicopter but
rotorcraft/gyroplane sounds right. Thanks for the correction. -- James H. Macklin ATP,CFI,A&P -- The people think the Constitution protects their rights; But government sees it as an obstacle to be overcome. some support http://www.usdoj.gov/olc/secondamendment2.htm See http://www.fija.org/ more about your rights and duties. "Sylvain" wrote in message ... | Jim Macklin wrote: | You can learn and do aerobatics, fly cross-country,fly land | and seaplanes or skis, airplanes, helicopters. | | | if I am not mistaken you can fly rotorcraft, but not helicopters, | i.e., you are limited to the gyroplane class in this category. But | then may be I misunderstood the new FARs (quite a different style | from the rest of the regulations); anyone? | | --Sylvain |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 19 Mar 2006 16:02:16 -0800, "AJ" wrote:
If someone was to ask, "Well, what can the sport pilot do," what would be the answer? Just about anything he wanted to, tailoring the training to his needs, and a whole lot more than I as a recreational pilot used to be able to do. When the Sport Pilot ticket was approved, I got together with my flight instructor (former instructor, now friend) and we talked about airspace for a while. He grabbed my logbook, wrote some words, and now I can fly in B/C/D airspace at will (my will and that of the controller ![]() -- all the best, Dan Ford email: usenet AT danford DOT net Warbird's Forum: www.warbirdforum.com Piper Cub Forum: www.pipercubforum.com In Search of Lost Time: www.readingproust.com |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 19 Mar 2006 18:24:29 -0800, "Peter Duniho"
wrote: Dan Ford notwithstanding, few pilots found the Recreational certificate to be a useful route to take, given how little they trimmed from the Private in terms of training requirements for it. I would be the first to say that I am a special case. Call me the exception that proves (tests) the rule. I had no intention of flying at night, I didn't like the Cessnas that I would have had to transition into (nothing against the airplane, only the iterations available at that particular airport), and I only wanted to fly the Cub, which became an obsession with me almost from the first day I flew one. Plus I was 66 at the time, and the fewer things I had to master, the better. I don't know which I would do today, recreational cert or Sport Pilot. I'm happy with the former now that it has been expanded to include controlled airspace. -- all the best, Dan Ford email: usenet AT danford DOT net Warbird's Forum: www.warbirdforum.com Piper Cub Forum: www.pipercubforum.com In Search of Lost Time: www.readingproust.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Most reliable homebuilt helicopter? | tom pettit | Home Built | 35 | September 29th 05 02:24 PM |
LSA instructor? | [email protected] | Piloting | 43 | August 12th 05 03:17 PM |
FAA has temporarily withdrawn the proposed Sport Pilot rule | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 2 | March 27th 04 06:23 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |