![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Monday I made a stop on a cross country flight to have lunch with my
daughter. Afterwards we dropped in to a used book store to browse. As usual I migrated to the aviation section. The gem I laid my eyes on this time was written in 1957 and titled, "Flying the Omnirange." It touts the advantages and incredible possibilities of the fantastic new VHF onmidirectional radio range (VOR) that was replacing the low-frequency rado ranges in the 1950's. Here are a few paragraphs that you may find interesting and mildly amusing. ![]() ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Here is the long-range program as visualized by the CAA and planned for completion in the 1960's: Before a pilot takes off on a flight a landing time will be reserved for him at his airport of destination. While he is enroute a dial will tell him continually, in minutes and seconds, whether he is ahead of or behind schedule, and he will slow his plane down or speed it up accordingly. On a screen in the cockpit the pilot will see a pictorial presentation of everything around him. This picture, probably televised from the ground, will show his own aircraft in relation to others in his vicinity, indicate obstructions or other hazards, and even show the location of storms and turbulent air. At the same time, radar will be continuously watching him from the ground. By means of a block system, something like that used on railroads, the pilot will be assured that he is in safe air space at all times. His aircraft will carry equipment which continuously transmits to the ground the readings of the cockpit instruments. Electronic brains on the ground will check these readings automatically against information derived from radar and other sources. If, for example, the altitude shown by ground radar differs from the altimeter reading in the cockpit, the pilot will be instantly and automatically notified. If the pilot wishes to change his altitude or his flight plan he will be able to communicate with the ground stations by pushing an appropriate button. Approval or disapproval will be flashed back to his cockpit in a fraction of a second, since the calculations will be made by automatic machines on the ground. This system may sound a bit fantastic in some respects, especially since it is due for realization within the next 6 or 7 years. Nevertheless, nearly all of the mechanisms and instruments upon which it is predicated already are in development and some of them are in actual use. The program will almost completely solve the weather problems which plague aviation today, and it will permit aircraft to fly their schedules with clocklike precision and absolute reliability. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -- Gene Seibel Hangar 131 - http://pad39a.com/gene/plane.html Because I fly, I envy no one. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Gene Seibel" wrote in message ups.com... Monday I made a stop on a cross country flight to have lunch with my daughter. Afterwards we dropped in to a used book store to browse. As usual I migrated to the aviation section. The gem I laid my eyes on this time was written in 1957 and titled, "Flying the Omnirange." It touts the advantages and incredible possibilities of the fantastic new VHF onmidirectional radio range (VOR) that was replacing the low-frequency rado ranges in the 1950's. Here are a few paragraphs that you may find interesting and mildly amusing. ![]() ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Here is the long-range program as visualized by the CAA and planned for completion in the 1960's: Before a pilot takes off on a flight a landing time will be reserved for him at his airport of destination. While he is enroute a dial will tell him continually, in minutes and seconds, whether he is ahead of or behind schedule, and he will slow his plane down or speed it up accordingly. On a screen in the cockpit the pilot will see a pictorial presentation of everything around him. This picture, probably televised from the ground, will show his own aircraft in relation to others in his vicinity, indicate obstructions or other hazards, and even show the location of storms and turbulent air. At the same time, radar will be continuously watching him from the ground. By means of a block system, something like that used on railroads, the pilot will be assured that he is in safe air space at all times. His aircraft will carry equipment which continuously transmits to the ground the readings of the cockpit instruments. Electronic brains on the ground will check these readings automatically against information derived from radar and other sources. If, for example, the altitude shown by ground radar differs from the altimeter reading in the cockpit, the pilot will be instantly and automatically notified. If the pilot wishes to change his altitude or his flight plan he will be able to communicate with the ground stations by pushing an appropriate button. Approval or disapproval will be flashed back to his cockpit in a fraction of a second, since the calculations will be made by automatic machines on the ground. This system may sound a bit fantastic in some respects, especially since it is due for realization within the next 6 or 7 years. Nevertheless, nearly all of the mechanisms and instruments upon which it is predicated already are in development and some of them are in actual use. The program will almost completely solve the weather problems which plague aviation today, and it will permit aircraft to fly their schedules with clocklike precision and absolute reliability. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I think I remember this one; and the first Omni we had in our airplane also. It was a Narco Superhomer. Cute little black box affair. Believe it or not, it was quite accurate and fun to use :-)))) Dudley Henriques |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sounds like the book is reffering more to a GPS than a VOR.
It's almost as if the author of this book knew what lay ahead as far as computers and GPS with an MFD. David |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If you selected those quotes because they seemed the most amusing or
'far-fetched', then they're actually impressively close to reality. It seems to me the only really 'wrong' thing in his vision is the idea that the new technology will free us from the constraints of weather. The majority of flight delays today are still due to weather. I like the part about the data being beamed back to the ground for cross-check. I've often wondered why we still use flight data recorders, with short (30min) recording capacity, when the data could be compiled every minute or so, compressed and sent in packets to a ground station, where it would be easily recoverable. GF |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thats exactly what I was thinking.
-- John Huthmaker PPL-SEL P-28-161 http://www.cogentnetworking.com "FLAV8R" wrote in message ... Sounds like the book is reffering more to a GPS than a VOR. It's almost as if the author of this book knew what lay ahead as far as computers and GPS with an MFD. David |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 11 May 2006 08:46:24 +0200, Greg Farris
wrote: I like the part about the data being beamed back to the ground for cross-check. I've often wondered why we still use flight data recorders, with short (30min) recording capacity, when the data could be compiled every minute or so, compressed and sent in packets to a ground station, where it would be easily recoverable. Perhaps because the air transport pilots don't want it... We could store more than 30 minutes right now if we so desired and it wouldn't really cost any more... Hell, look at how much data gets put on an MP3 player... |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Greg Farris
wrote: I like the part about the data being beamed back to the ground for cross-check. I've often wondered why we still use flight data recorders, with short (30min) recording capacity, because those are the old FDR and CVRs. Newer ones record more data and longer periods. Eventually the old ones will be replaced. Note that instrumenting an aircraft, especially a non-digital aircraft is incredibly expensive. when the data could be compiled every minute or so, compressed and sent in packets to a ground station, where it would be easily recoverable. Consider how much spectrum would be required for this. Who would pay for the air time and the ground infrastructure? Consider how few crashes occur each year for larger aircraft. -- Bob Noel Looking for a sig the lawyers will hate |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The new VLJ Eclipse 500 will have data link and on-board
data storage for maintenance. "Bob Noel" wrote in message ... | In article , Greg Farris | wrote: | | I like the part about the data being beamed back to the ground for | cross-check. I've often wondered why we still use flight data recorders, | with short (30min) recording capacity, | | because those are the old FDR and CVRs. Newer ones record more data | and longer periods. Eventually the old ones will be replaced. | | Note that instrumenting an aircraft, especially a non-digital aircraft is | incredibly expensive. | | when the data could be compiled | every minute or so, compressed and sent in packets to a ground station, | where it would be easily recoverable. | | Consider how much spectrum would be required for this. Who would pay for | the air time and the ground infrastructure? | | Consider how few crashes occur each year for larger aircraft. | | -- | Bob Noel | Looking for a sig the | lawyers will hate | |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If you selected those quotes because they seemed the most amusing or
'far-fetched', then they're actually impressively close to reality. Well, maybe for the rarified elite who can afford to buy brand new planes equipped with G1000 glass panels. For the rest of us, that prediction is still far, far in the future. And, of course, weather is still the same deal-killer it was in the 50s. The author was only off by, say, 70 years? :-) -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"FLAV8R" wrote in message
... Sounds like the book is reffering more to a GPS than a VOR. It's almost as if the author of this book knew what lay ahead as far as computers and GPS with an MFD. It seems to me that, at the time, for pilots who were used to flying MUCH more primitively, with A-N radio courses, maybe NDBs, and no radar coverage most of the time, the advances that brought VORs and near-100% radar coverage were likely much like to them as GPS is to us. In another 50 years, when we have navigation that positions airplanes to the inch and tracks timing to the tenth of a second, we'll be reading descriptions of GPS and thinking, "gee, it's almost as if the author knew what lay ahead". Pete |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
The Future of Naval Aviation. | Mike | Naval Aviation | 0 | March 22nd 06 07:16 PM |
ATC User Fees | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 80 | May 12th 05 07:20 AM |
How safe is it, really? | June | Piloting | 227 | December 10th 04 05:01 AM |
General Aviation Legal Defense Fund | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | May 11th 04 10:43 PM |