![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At 21:30 27 May 2006, Gary Evans wrote:I have culled
the collective wisdom in this threadto save any new followers time. Use of Trutrak T&B indicator for emergency cloudflying1) To fly in a cloud means certain death or worse.2) You should fly in clouds for practice.3) Special training is required to survive a cloudflight.4) You can train yourself.5) Special instruments are necessary for cloud flight.6) Instruments are worthless in a cloud.Gary, you missed out no. 77) Any attempt a levity will be rewarded with a lengthy and very serious lecture. You have been warned! |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At 21:30 27 May 2006, Gary Evans wrote:I have culled
the collective wisdom in this threadto save any new followers time. Use of Trutrak T&B indicator for emergency cloudflying1) To fly in a cloud means certain death or worse.2) You should fly in clouds for practice.3) Special training is required to survive a cloudflight.4) You can train yourself.5) Special instruments are necessary for cloud flight.6) Instruments are worthless in a cloud.Gary, you missed out no. 77) Any attempt a levity will be rewarded with a lengthy and very serious lecture. You have been warned! |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Chris Reed schrieb:
Many glider pilots can't practice because cloud flying is generally illegal in their countries. In most countries, it's prefectly legal. France is an exception, also Spain and Italy, if I recall correctly. It's just not too common in most countries. 4) You can train yourself. For each and every activity, there has always been at least one person who had to train himself. It's just the survival rate which was sometimes less than desired, though. An artificial horizon is clearly easier because it gives you bank and pitch simultaneously. However, as the earlier poster who actually uses one points out, you need a T&S as backup in case the horizon fails. The T&S is more than a backup. It's absolutely indispesable for cross reference. Each artificial horizon has some drift over time (even if it doesn't tumble). (Only for those multi thousand dollar high tech ring laser systems drift can be neglected.) And then, these (mechanical) horizons were typically built for straight and level flight, not for tight circling in a bumpy cloud. Stay 15 minutes in such a cloud, which is a reasonable time, and most horizons will show more or less wrong bank. Only the T&S will *always* show the correct data, due to the construction principle (as long as it's not broken, of course). Definitely no, if you mean horizon/T&S/horizon. Other instruments (except, I understand, a Bohli compass in the hands of an expert) are little or no use for maintaining control in cloud. Definitely no. Of course you can cloud fly with minimal instruments, but it's the redundancy of a full panel (and you being able to use this redundancy) which makes it safe. And of course you need a compass (plain old whisky works fine, if you know how to interpret it) to leave the cloud in the desired direction. Stefan |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In my powered aircraft I have full IFR panels (AI, HSI or DG, TC etc). In my
glider I have a TruTrac and Garmin 196 or 396 (XM weather is sure nice, but that sucker uses the power). Unlike Stefan, I love the TruTrac. It's simulated horizon tracks the real horizon nicely up to about a 45 degree bank or so. I ordered it with the glider recommended 1 minute turn rate. I find it easier to fly than the needle and ball I had in my previous glider. bumper "Mike Lindsay" wrote in message ... In article , bumper writes Not only no, but heck no! Instrument training is relatively intense, with lots to learn and practice, including "unusual attitude" recovery with only partial panel (artificial horizon or AI covered, with only Turn Coordinator). The TC is not as stable in turbulence as a needle and ball (or TruTrac), as the gyro is at an angle to give yaw info - - this is why many pilots prefer a needle and ball as to the TC as back up. Bottom line, without adequate training and practice and proper instruments, if you are planning to go IMC, please remember that pilots with much more experience than you and I have either died or had to save themselves by bailing out when their spars snapped like twigs. bumper So, what would you regard as 'proper instruments'? -- Mike Lindsay |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Does anyone have any experience with the MGL Attitude & Heading
Reference System? http://www.mglavionics.co.za/singles.html It looks interesting, Craggy Aero is selling this one along with the TruTrack system (http://www.craggyaero.com/solidstate.htm). Markus |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Glider vs. Power Pattern Bank Angle? | Jim Vincent | Soaring | 28 | June 15th 04 03:41 PM |
Puchaz Spinning thread that might be of interest in light of the recent accident. | Al | Soaring | 134 | February 9th 04 03:44 PM |
Angle of climb at Vx and glide angle when "overweight": five questions | Koopas Ly | Piloting | 16 | November 29th 03 10:01 PM |
Safety of winch launch vrs. aero tow? | Gary Boggs | Soaring | 172 | November 13th 03 06:59 PM |
Lift and Angle of Attack | Peter Duniho | Simulators | 9 | October 2nd 03 10:55 PM |