![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Does anyone have a handy operation manual
to check out either Aeronca 7AC Champ or J3 Cub's V speed? Thank you very much. Shin |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Find TCDS for all FAA certified aircraft
http://www.airweb.faa.gov/Regulatory...e?OpenFrameSet -- James H. Macklin ATP,CFI,A&P -- The people think the Constitution protects their rights; But government sees it as an obstacle to be overcome. some support http://www.usdoj.gov/olc/secondamendment2.htm See http://www.fija.org/ more about your rights and duties. "Robert M. Gary" wrote in message oups.com... | My Aeronca 11AC cruised at about 90 mph. I only have about 10 hrs of | Champ PIC but I remeber it about 5 mph faster. In the J-3 I got about | 70 mph. The Aeronca is 100% better airplane in everyway other than the | name. The Champ allows you to fly from the front, your legs do not wrap | around your passengers, your brakes do not run cables that your feet | get stuck on, you can fly the Aeronca with regular shoes, the J-3 | requires slippers (because your feet have to wrap around the peddle to | access the brake), the Aeronca handles turb ok, the J-3 bobs up and | down on any slight bump, the Aeronca will fly straight if you let go, | the J-3 will wonder all over the place, etc, etc. Plus, in the Aeronca | you can see where you are going, in the J-3, you cruise around looking | straight down because you have almost no in-flight, forward vis. | Both planes stall at 0 mph IAS, I don't recall the TAS's but its | somewhere around 38 mph. | | | | -Robert | |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Robert M. Gary" wrote the J-3 will wonder all over the place, Jeez, I would think an airplane's life would be pretty simple. You know, go around and fly a bit, then land, repeat when asked to do so. I wonder what they are thinking about, when they wonder about things, all over the place. bfg (ducking, now! ;-)) -- Jim in NC |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Robert M. Gary wrote:
Both planes stall at 0 mph IAS, . . . Wow! Does that also mean that perpetual motion really exists and P really does equal nP? ![]() -- Chris W KE5GIX Gift Giving Made Easy Get the gifts you want & give the gifts they want One stop wish list for any gift, from anywhere, for any occasion! http://thewishzone.com |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This is exactly what I need. I found the Champ document at this
website. Thank you very much, Robert. Shin |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wow! Does that also mean that perpetual motion really exists and P
really does equal nP? ![]() No, it just means the installation error of the pitot tube exceeds the TAS at the stall. -Robert |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Morgans wrote: Jeez, I would think an airplane's life would be pretty simple. You know, go around and fly a bit, then land, repeat when asked to do so. I wonder what they are thinking about, when they wonder about things, all over the place. bfg (ducking, now! ;-)) Jim in NC My little brother used to say that when he grows up, he wants to be a firetruck. I'll ask him, since I think he's got some airplane friends. tom yabfg |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 30 May 2006 07:23:58 -0700, wrote:
Does anyone have a handy operation manual to check out either Aeronca 7AC Champ or J3 Cub's V speed? Thank you very much. Of course there is no operation manual for the J-3, but here are the figures given me in ground school: Cruise 73 mph Top 83 mph Stall 39 mph Best glide 50 mph Green arc 39-90 mph (of course, neither is there any green arc!) Yellow arc 90-122 mph Red line 122 mph That said, I would *never* fly a 60-year-old Cub at 122 mph! -- all the best, Dan Ford email: usenet AT danford DOT net Warbird's Forum: www.warbirdforum.com Piper Cub Forum: www.pipercubforum.com In Search of Lost Time: www.readingproust.com |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 30 May 2006 09:58:06 -0700, "Robert M. Gary"
wrote: The Aeronca is 100% better airplane in everyway other than the name. And looks, and resale value, and historical association ... -- all the best, Dan Ford email: usenet AT danford DOT net Warbird's Forum: www.warbirdforum.com Piper Cub Forum: www.pipercubforum.com In Search of Lost Time: www.readingproust.com |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
V Speeds | [email protected] | Piloting | 22 | March 16th 06 09:20 PM |
terminology questions: turtledeck? cantilever wing? | Ric | Home Built | 2 | September 13th 05 09:39 PM |
Landing and T/O distances (Was Cold War ALternate Basing) | Guy Alcala | Military Aviation | 3 | August 13th 04 12:18 PM |
Space Elevator | Big John | Home Built | 111 | July 21st 04 04:31 PM |
Va and turbulent air penetration speed. | Doug | Instrument Flight Rules | 70 | January 11th 04 08:35 PM |