![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cessna is working on a LSA to be unveiled at Oshkosh this year. It
kinda sounds like a modern 152. If this enters production it would help legitimize the LSA segment (not that it needed it). Between this plane and the "Cirrus Killer" and a new jet sized below the Mustang, the Cessna product planning crew must be working overtime these days... Here's a link to the company press release: http://www.cessna.com/news/article.c...5rb0IwV1R6VtDK |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cessna is working on a LSA to be unveiled at Oshkosh this year. It
kinda sounds like a modern 152. If this enters production it would help legitimize the LSA segment Cool. But if you've flown the "CT", you know that the "modern 152" is already on the market, brand new, for less than $90K. http://www.flightdesignusa.com/ I flew it a couple of weeks ago, and am now counting the days until my kids are grown and I can justify buying a 2-seater. It is a really fun plane to fly -- and, being made entirely from carbon-fiber -- it feels like a "real" plane, not a glorified ultra-light like so many current LSAs. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Kingfish" wrote in news:1149702942.302087.9400
@h76g2000cwa.googlegroups.com: Jay Honeck wrote: Cool. But if you've flown the "CT", you know that the "modern 152" is already on the market, brand new, for less than $90K. http://www.flightdesignusa.com/ I suspect Cessna's plane will look a lot less like something Dr. Seuss would have designed than the CT : ) Yup, ever since I first saw/flew the CT, I've said it should have a smiley clown face painted on it's nose big grin -- -- ET :-) "A common mistake people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools."---- Douglas Adams |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jay Honeck" wrote Cool. But if you've flown the "CT", you know that the "modern 152" is already on the market, brand new, for less than $90K. http://www.flightdesignusa.com/ Nah. Bad mistake. It still uses a Rotax, which "I" will avoid like the plague. I flew it a couple of weeks ago, and am now counting the days until my kids are grown and I can justify buying a 2-seater. It is a really fun plane to fly -- and, being made entirely from carbon-fiber -- it feels like a "real" plane, not a glorified ultra-light like so many current LSAs. Put a O-200 in it, and you might have something. -- Jim in NC |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Kingfish wrote: Cessna is working on a LSA to be unveiled at Oshkosh this year. It kinda sounds like a modern 152. If this enters production it would help legitimize the LSA segment (not that it needed it). Between this plane and the "Cirrus Killer" and a new jet sized below the Mustang, the Cessna product planning crew must be working overtime these days... Cirrus killer? Nobody needs to build one of those. Just stand back and try not to get hit with the Cirrii that are currently raining down. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Kingfish" wrote in message ...
I suspect Cessna's plane will look a lot less like something Dr. Seuss would have designed than the CT : ) Now that was the funniest description I have ever heard. You are 100% correct on that one. David |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay Honeck wrote:
Cessna is working on a LSA to be unveiled at Oshkosh this year. It kinda sounds like a modern 152. If this enters production it would help legitimize the LSA segment Cool. But if you've flown the "CT", you know that the "modern 152" is already on the market, brand new, for less than $90K. http://www.flightdesignusa.com/ I flew it a couple of weeks ago, and am now counting the days until my kids are grown and I can justify buying a 2-seater. It is a really fun plane to fly -- and, being made entirely from carbon-fiber -- it feels like a "real" plane, not a glorified ultra-light like so many current LSAs. Unfortunately, I can't see myself flying something so ugly :-) And Cessna, assuming they produce a decent design, have a support network that is pretty well unparalleled in the industry. They are likely to still be around in 20 years when I need spare parts. Assuming I live 20 more years! :-) Matt |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article W5Dhg.21385$No1.1745@attbi_s71,
"Jay Honeck" wrote: I flew it a couple of weeks ago, and am now counting the days until my kids are grown and I can justify buying a 2-seater. And you can still attend OSH and SNF. I have flown the Champ to both. You learn to pack only the essentials. If you aren't going to use it more than once, you don't pack it. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Morgans" wrote in
: "Jay Honeck" wrote Cool. But if you've flown the "CT", you know that the "modern 152" is already on the market, brand new, for less than $90K. http://www.flightdesignusa.com/ Nah. Bad mistake. It still uses a Rotax, which "I" will avoid like the plague. I flew it a couple of weeks ago, and am now counting the days until my kids are grown and I can justify buying a 2-seater. It is a really fun plane to fly -- and, being made entirely from carbon-fiber -- it feels like a "real" plane, not a glorified ultra-light like so many current LSAs. Put a O-200 in it, and you might have something. There is nothing wrong with the Rotax, but you CAN get an LSA with an 0-200; the 601XL from AMD. -- -- ET :-) "A common mistake people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools."---- Douglas Adams |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "ET" wrote in message ... "Morgans" wrote in : "Jay Honeck" wrote Cool. But if you've flown the "CT", you know that the "modern 152" is already on the market, brand new, for less than $90K. http://www.flightdesignusa.com/ Nah. Bad mistake. It still uses a Rotax, which "I" will avoid like the plague. I flew it a couple of weeks ago, and am now counting the days until my kids are grown and I can justify buying a 2-seater. It is a really fun plane to fly -- and, being made entirely from carbon-fiber -- it feels like a "real" plane, not a glorified ultra-light like so many current LSAs. Put a O-200 in it, and you might have something. There is nothing wrong with the Rotax, but you CAN get an LSA with an 0-200; the 601XL from AMD. -- And the Champ from Americam Champion. The unugly alternative. -- ET :-) "A common mistake people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools."---- Douglas Adams |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1/72 Cessna 300, 400 series scale models | Ale | Owning | 3 | October 22nd 13 03:40 PM |
Air Force One Had to Intercept Some Inadvertent Flyers / How? | Rick Umali | Piloting | 29 | February 15th 06 04:40 AM |
Nearly had my life terminated today | Michelle P | Piloting | 11 | September 3rd 05 02:37 AM |
Wow - heard on the air... (long) | Nathan Young | Piloting | 68 | July 25th 05 06:51 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |