Overweight? Out of CG? Stalled? Too slow?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZWC2X...rplane%20pilot

Overweight? Out of CG? Stalled? Too slow? What do you all think?

Monk

Flyingmonk wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZWC2X...rplane%20pilot

Overweight? Out of CG? Stalled? Too slow? What do you all think?

Hard to tell from that. I don't understand Spanish and wasn't sure I
understood the video. The first part looked to be from after the crash
when they were treating the people, yet the airplane looked to be in too
good of condition to have survived the crash that was show later in the
video, especially given the fire. The airplane looked to be right wing
heavy and then it appeared that a lot of left rudder was applied to try
to raise the wing.

The airplane seemed to get off the ground reasonably quickly and it
climbed well out of ground effect so I wouldn't immediately suspect it
being overweight. I couldn't make out the position of the elevator
given the poor video quality. If it was an aft CG problem, one would
expect to see full down elevator to try to lower the nose, but I
couldn't tell if that was the case at all.

Do you have any further information as to what the cause was?

Matt

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZWC2X...rplane%20pilot

Overweight? Out of CG? Stalled? Too slow? What do you all think?

I do know Spanish but the site insists that I get the latest version of
Flash. I'm not about to get the latest version of something I consider
odious to begin with, so I'm not going to think anything.

Jose
--
The monkey turns the crank and thinks he's making the music.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.

In a previous article, Jose said:
I do know Spanish but the site insists that I get the latest version of
Flash. I'm not about to get the latest version of something I consider
odious to begin with, so I'm not going to think anything.

That's the second time today you've posted to boast about your aversion to
Flash. Why do you think anybody cares?


--
Paul Tomblin http://xcski.com/blogs/pt/
"This also tells they understand our language. They are just not willing to
speak to us using it." "Who knew they were French?" - Babylon 5

That's the second time today you've posted to boast about your aversion to
Flash. Why do you think anybody cares?

I suppose I'm making too much noise, but if nobody makes noise, the
assault will continue. I'll be happy to tell you why flash is so bad if
you like, but as you note, it's probably OT here.

Jose
--
The monkey turns the crank and thinks he's making the music.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.

"Paul Tomblin" wrote in message
...
That's the second time today you've posted to boast about your aversion to
Flash. Why do you think anybody cares?

The same reason they "care" about your aversion to Windows and other
Microsoft software.

Maybe people do and maybe people don't, but it seems a little out of line
for you to bother commenting on his anti-Flash posts, given you are of the
same habit for software you don't like.

Pete

Jose wrote in news:vFllg.119241$dW3.30429
@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com:

I suppose I'm making too much noise, but if nobody makes noise, the
assault will continue. I'll be happy to tell you why flash is so bad if
you like, but as you note, it's probably OT here.

But so was your original rant... Why hold back now?

In article ,
Matt Whiting wrote:

Flyingmonk wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZWC2X...rplane%20pilot

Overweight? Out of CG? Stalled? Too slow? What do you all think?

Overweight.

Hard to tell from that. I don't understand Spanish and wasn't sure I
understood the video. The first part looked to be from after the crash
when they were treating the people,

No, it was some kind of medevac mission. The video is in chronological
order. They had the plane stuffed completely full of people and heavy
equipment, including a pretty large gas cylinder of some kind.

yet the airplane looked to be in too
good of condition to have survived the crash that was show later in the
video, especially given the fire. The airplane looked to be right wing
heavy and then it appeared that a lot of left rudder was applied to try
to raise the wing.

The airplane seemed to get off the ground reasonably quickly

Not to me. It looked like it was behind the power curve the whole time.

and it climbed well out of ground effect

Only for a few seconds, which just proves it was overweight but not
stalled (yet). They were just barely flying, they traded the last bit
of extra airspeed they had for altitude when they ran out of runway, and
then they mushed it in.

rg

But so was your original rant... Why hold back now?

It's ok to go off topic every now and then. It's even ok if an entire
conversation drifts off topic. However I don't think it's appropriate
to continue off topic just for the purpose of expressing frustration at
something that has nothing to do with the forum...unless enough people
ask for it (and the subject line is changed appropriately).

Jose
--
The monkey turns the crank and thinks he's making the music.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.

Ron Garret wrote:
In article ,
Matt Whiting wrote:


Flyingmonk wrote:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZWC2X...rplane%20pilot

Overweight? Out of CG? Stalled? Too slow? What do you all think?


Overweight.


Hard to tell from that. I don't understand Spanish and wasn't sure I
understood the video. The first part looked to be from after the crash
when they were treating the people,


No, it was some kind of medevac mission. The video is in chronological
order. They had the plane stuffed completely full of people and heavy
equipment, including a pretty large gas cylinder of some kind.

OK, I wasn't clear on that. I saw what appeared to be someone holding a
bloody piece of bandage and the cylinder, so I thought maybe that was
the rescue part of the incident, but the condition of the fuselage
certainly wasn't consistent with a crash at that speed!


yet the airplane looked to be in too
good of condition to have survived the crash that was show later in the
video, especially given the fire. The airplane looked to be right wing
heavy and then it appeared that a lot of left rudder was applied to try
to raise the wing.

The airplane seemed to get off the ground reasonably quickly


Not to me. It looked like it was behind the power curve the whole time.

I guess that is a matter of opinion. I flew a C172 over gross (not a
lot) on a hot day before and it took off worse than what is on the video
and the initial climb was more sluggish than shown there. However, I
kept the nose down until I had 80 knots and then was able to climb like
a 150. :-) It did look like he was behind the power curve, but what
seemed strange to me was the large skid the airplane appeared to be in.
Maybe it was just the camera angle though.


and it climbed well out of ground effect


Only for a few seconds, which just proves it was overweight but not
stalled (yet). They were just barely flying, they traded the last bit
of extra airspeed they had for altitude when they ran out of runway, and
then they mushed it in.

I'm not as certain as you. Ground effect begins to be detectable at one
wing span of altitude above the grond, but just barely (see reference).
I was always taught that it really is only signficant at 1/2 the wing
span. However, I agree with you that the airplane appeared to get 50 -
75 feet high which is well out of ground effect. He should have been
able to fly away once getting to that height. I wonder if something got
into the controls or something like that. I just am not sure that what
we saw is completely explained by either overloading or out of balance.

Matt