Home Slamming Down Under; Drone Slamming in AZ

On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 12:51:23 -0600, Newps wrote
in :



Skylune wrote:

Your "fears" had nothing to do with house slamming.

Rather, they had to do with compatibility with GA.


Does anybody have any idea to whom or what he is responding to?


If you'll look at the 'References:' header contained in his article,
you'll find Loony was following up to:
Message-ID:

("Newps" wrote)
Does anybody have any idea to whom or what he is responding to?


With DeLoon DeLoon it's either this, or ...the other way.

Of the two, this is better.


Montblack

-----Original Message-----
From: Skylune ]
Posted At: Tuesday, August 08, 2006 8:53 AM
Posted To: rec.aviation.piloting
Conversation: Home Slamming Down Under; Drone Slamming in AZ
Subject: Home Slamming Down Under; Drone Slamming in AZ

I'll bet they are highly skilled drivers, then.

As you know, Steve, Massachusetts, one of the many nanny states, is
debating RESTRICTING licenses to young, inexperienced drivers.
FAA/AOPA
cabal on the other hand wants EVERYONE INTO THE AIR!!

Step right up, and get your LSA license!


I'll be first in line if I can find a pressurized LSA that will operate
at VLJ altitudes where I can take advantage of the winds...

-----Original Message-----
From: Skylune ]
Posted At: Tuesday, August 08, 2006 9:48 AM
Posted To: rec.aviation.piloting
Conversation: Home Slamming Down Under; Drone Slamming in AZ
Subject: Home Slamming Down Under; Drone Slamming in AZ

Yes it is. FAA's conflicting, dueling missions are to promote
aviation
(VLJs do just that, and airport grants to extend runways to accomodate
the
VLJs are evidience) and enhance safety.

Your premise is invalid. Promoting aviation and enhancing safety are not
conflicting missions.

-----Original Message-----
From: Skylune ]
Posted At: Tuesday, August 08, 2006 8:35 AM
Posted To: rec.aviation.piloting
Conversation: Home Slamming Down Under; Drone Slamming in AZ
Subject: Home Slamming Down Under; Drone Slamming in AZ

But, given your criticisms, I contacted an expert: Bill Mulcahy.

He agrees with me: slammings will become more frequent as more planes
flown by GA pilots are pushed into the air by the FAA.

I'm glad someone's gonna push...this damn avgas is getting way too
expensive.

-----Original Message-----
From: john smith ]
Posted At: Thursday, August 10, 2006 9:20 AM
Posted To: rec.aviation.piloting
Conversation: Home Slamming Down Under; Drone Slamming in AZ
Subject: UAVs A Threat to Public Safety? (Was: Home Slamming
Down
Un

The real test for UAV's will be the first lawsuit against the
manufacturer and the operator when one kills someone.

Haven't we already done that with one (or more) in Iraq?

Gotta love technology...

-----Original Message-----
From: Bob Fry ]
Posted At: Tuesday, August 08, 2006 8:22 PM
Posted To: rec.aviation.piloting
Conversation: Home Slamming Down Under; Drone Slamming in AZ
Subject: Home Slamming Down Under; Drone Slamming in AZ

"nitramwin" == nitramwin writes:

nitramwin im still new here but i think ur comment didnt quite
nitramwin make sense

nitramwin could u comment back and tell me what u meant?

nitramwin thanx

Lesson #1. Usenet is not IM. There is no need to use odd word
abbreviations that teeny-boppers like. Please spell out your words in
full. Bonus points for using a spell-checker before posting.

Extra bonus points if someone can find me a meaning checker...

"Larry Dighera" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 12:51:23 -0600, Newps wrote
in :



Skylune wrote:

Your "fears" had nothing to do with house slamming.

Rather, they had to do with compatibility with GA.


Does anybody have any idea to whom or what he is responding to?


If you'll look at the 'References:' header contained in his article,
you'll find Loony was following up to:
Message-ID:

So because the Lune can't properly reply to a message we should have to go
back and check headers? Jeez

On Fri, 11 Aug 2006 08:21:48 -0500, "Gig 601XL Builder"
wrDOTgiaconaATcox.net wrote in :


So because the Lune can't properly reply to a message we should have to go
back and check headers? Jeez

If you use a threaded news reader, it should be obvious from the
juxtaposition of the articles which are in response to which. I've
never used Microsoft Outlook Express, but I would expect it to be
capable of displaying article relationships.

To answer your question, I don't think Loony has anything to say worth
the effort to decipher his non-standard postings.

"Larry Dighera" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 11 Aug 2006 08:21:48 -0500, "Gig 601XL Builder"
wrDOTgiaconaATcox.net wrote in :


So because the Lune can't properly reply to a message we should have to go
back and check headers? Jeez

If you use a threaded news reader, it should be obvious from the
juxtaposition of the articles which are in response to which. I've
never used Microsoft Outlook Express, but I would expect it to be
capable of displaying article relationships.

To answer your question, I don't think Loony has anything to say worth
the effort to decipher his non-standard postings.


OE Express threads ok buy I hide messages that I have read and the threading
does seem to get messed up regularly anyway.