![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Neil Gould wrote: Well, *all* restrictions go away in an emergency Yes, but irrelavant to the discussion. , so that doesn't really address the root of the problem. You missed the root of the problem completely. The reason why you can't file such an alternate is that you don't have the minimum information required to safely fly that approach. No, that's not why. As a matter of fact you do have all the information. The reg is there to provide redundancy. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Recently, Newps posted:
Neil Gould wrote: The reason why you can't file such an alternate is that you don't have the minimum information required to safely fly that approach. No, that's not why. As a matter of fact you do have all the information. The reg is there to provide redundancy. Oh? The question Robert asked was whether he could legally fly VORDME approaches if he removed his DME after installing the 430. I thought Thomas Borchert gave a very good reply, which seemed clear to me. I'm sure that my IFR training, which is not very deep, may lack some practical point about this, as I don't see how a reg that requires you to specify the equipment on board could allow one to file an alternate that requires equipment that you don't have. If I have that wrong, I would appreciate your clearing it up for me. Neil |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Robert M. Gary wrote:
That was my fear. I don't plan on keep the DB up to date all the time and I still need to be able to fly VORDME approaches. I guess I'll need to keep my King DME. I assume I can slave it off the 430's nav. Probably can. I have a 480 and it is driving my King DME. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jose wrote:
...then you can't legally use the alternate Not quite. You can't file that airport as an alternate if you need the GPS to get in there. However, once you actually =need= an alternate, that restriction goes away. It's a restriction on filing, not on flying. Jose An "alternate" only exists for filing purposes. After that you're just changing your destination. The minimums, equipment requirements, etc... are the same. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Neil Gould wrote:
Recently, Jose posted: ...then you can't legally use the alternate Not quite. You can't file that airport as an alternate if you need the GPS to get in there. However, once you actually =need= an alternate, that restriction goes away. It's a restriction on filing, not on flying. Well, *all* restrictions go away in an emergency, Going to an alternate isn't an emergency. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Lyc. O-360 cylinder question | JB | Owning | 13 | November 27th 04 09:32 PM |
Handheld battery question | RobsSanta | General Aviation | 8 | September 19th 04 03:07 PM |
A question on Airworthiness Inspection | Dave S | Home Built | 1 | August 10th 04 05:07 AM |
Question | Charles S | Home Built | 4 | April 5th 04 09:10 PM |
Partnership Question | Harry Gordon | Owning | 4 | August 16th 03 11:23 PM |