![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dickless David Tholen whined and tholed:
One particular message board that I visit uses HTML, or HTML-like tags, for messages. If I type plain text, then multiple spaces get compressed into just one, which makes column alignment of tables next to impossible. By using the pre tag, however, multiple spaces are preserved. IE will display such a message as expected, but Firefox will display it triple spaced (vertically). If I replace the usual CR-LF record separators with br, then Firefox will display the message as expected, but then IE will refuse to display blank lines. Why is it that Firefox and IE display such HTML so differently? Which one is doing it right? Is there a simple tag that will make the message look the same way in both browsers? It sounds more like its crappy 0S/2, Dickless. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Completely anal retentive kookdancing queen, Dickless Davie Tholen the
"irrelevaant" Ignoranus whined and tholed like the antagonistic arsehole that he is: wrote: One particular message board that I visit uses HTML, or HTML-like tags, for messages. If I type plain text, then multiple spaces get compressed into just one, which makes column alignment of tables next to impossible. By using the pre tag, however, multiple spaces are preserved. IE will display such a message as expected, but Firefox will display it triple spaced (vertically). If I replace the usual CR-LF record separators with br, then Firefox will display the message as expected, but then IE will refuse to display blank lines. Why is it that Firefox and IE display such HTML so differently? Which one is doing it right? Is there a simple tag that will make the message look the same way in both browsers? It sounds more like its crappy 0S/2, Still hallucinating, mbbr? Given that the difference is seen with Firefox for Windows and IE, with Firefox for OS/2 behaving the same way as Firefox for Windows, it obviously has nothing to do with OS/2, so there is no such sound for you to hear. What sound would that be, The one you claimed to have heard, mbbr. Having memory problems, mbbr? A "lassic" hallucination on your part, Dickless. Dickless? Who is "Dickless", mbbr? Also having attribution problems, mbbr? Who is "mbbr", Dickless? Having atrribution problems again, Dickless? A "lassical" one? What does your question have to do with Firefox and IE not displaying tagged text the same way, mbbr? What does your "lassic" hallucination have to do with classical music, Dickless? You must really enjoy making a fool of yourself in three more newsgroups than necessary, mbbr. Note: no response. I note that you chose to make a fool of yourself in only one more newsgroup this time, mbbr, one in which you're already known to be a fool. Who is "mbbr", Dickless? Having atrribution problems again, Dickless? Dickless. Also having attribution problems, mbbr? Who is mbbr, Also having trouble remembering which handle you're using, mbbr? Who is "mbbr", Dickless? Having atrribution problems again, Dickless? Dickless? Who is "Dickless", mbbr? Still having attribution problems, mbbr? Who is "mbbr", Dickless? Having atrribution problems again, Dickless? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In a frenzy of back-pedalling too fast for the eye to follow,
exuded: [quantity of feeble rejoinders removed] Well, mbbr, David Tholen sure whipped your sorry hide. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() William wrote: In a frenzy of back-pedalling too fast for the eye to follow, exuded: [quantity of feeble rejoinders removed] Well, mbbr, David Tholen sure whipped your sorry hide. No surprise there - Bruce will never get the better of Tholen, although he keeps trying. Please keep this out of rec.music.classical. Thanks. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
William wrote:
In a frenzy of back-pedalling too fast for the eye to follow, exuded: [quantity of feeble rejoinders removed] Well, mbbr, David Tholen sure whipped your sorry hide. On what basis do you make that k'lame, Billy boy? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
William wrote:
Michael Baldwin, Bruce wrote: William wrote: In a frenzy of back-pedalling too fast for the eye to follow, exuded: [quantity of feeble rejoinders removed] Well, mbbr, David Tholen sure whipped your sorry hide. On what basis do you make that k'lame, Billy boy? On the basis of the available evidence, obviously. The only available evidence, Billy boy, is that Dickless is a kook with 7 kook awards. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mars wrote:
"Lora" . wrote in message reenews.net... Michael Baldwin, Bruce wrote: Mars wrote: Check out Nightingale's pathetic excuse for a blog - http://nightingale0.livejournal.com/ Lame isn't it? I bet it runs on 0S/2. You would lose. She devoted a journal entry to me. If the "artwork" is typical of what you handed in, you are going to fail your drawing course - will you still graduate this year? I'd fail her just for being a fat, ugly cow. But that's just the kinda guy I am. Fortunately, I only hand in my drawings, not my photo. They are pretty bad - worst in the class I'm sure, but I don't think the prof will fail anyone. Lucky you. Are you going to get the same easy prof next term? Easy prof? Usually, its fat chicks who are easy. Is the prof fat too? "Mars" wrote in message reenews.net... "Lora Crighton" wrote in message ... Mars wrote: this didn't make it for some reason - resending I ended up seeing it three times, which was three times too many. I love you too, tweetie. As for your comment in the other thread about my biggest wish never happening, unfortunately you may be right - my biggest wish is for the trolls to leave my favourite newsgroup alone, but you keep coming back. Hahahaha. Still single? Happy with it, or just resigned to the fact that nobody wants you? Shouldn't you be studying for your exams? I'm doing well. How about you? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mars wrote:
"Michael Baldwin, Bruce" wrote in message oups.com... Mars wrote: "Lora" . wrote in message reenews.net... Michael Baldwin, Bruce wrote: Mars wrote: Check out Nightingale's pathetic excuse for a blog - http://nightingale0.livejournal.com/ Lame isn't it? I bet it runs on 0S/2. You would lose. She devoted a journal entry to me. If the "artwork" is typical of what you handed in, you are going to fail your drawing course - will you still graduate this year? I'd fail her just for being a fat, ugly cow. But that's just the kinda guy I am. Fortunately, I only hand in my drawings, not my photo. They are pretty bad - worst in the class I'm sure, but I don't think the prof will fail anyone. Lucky you. Are you going to get the same easy prof next term? Easy prof? Usually, its fat chicks who are easy. Is the prof fat too? Don't know the prof., but she said that he wasn't going to fail anyone, so he must be easy. Or fat. Or both. "Mars" wrote in message reenews.net... "Lora Crighton" wrote in message ... Mars wrote: this didn't make it for some reason - resending I ended up seeing it three times, which was three times too many. I love you too, tweetie. As for your comment in the other thread about my biggest wish never happening, unfortunately you may be right - my biggest wish is for the trolls to leave my favourite newsgroup alone, but you keep coming back. Hahahaha. Still single? Happy with it, or just resigned to the fact that nobody wants you? Shouldn't you be studying for your exams? I'm doing well. How about you? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
OLC? | Mike | Soaring | 25 | November 11th 06 06:02 AM |
A/FD is online | Gary Drescher | Piloting | 46 | October 28th 06 06:13 PM |
First there was Firefox..... | Steve | Military Aviation | 16 | July 16th 04 01:35 AM |
Firefox? | Christopher | Military Aviation | 18 | December 3rd 03 07:19 PM |