![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just in the news during the last few days: The Dutch minister of Defence
has announced (yet another) cutback. The Air Force will loose 29 F-16s, leaving 108 in service. Twente air base, which is one of three Dutch F-16 bases will be closed. Six out of 30 virtually brand-new AH-64Ds are to be sold (to whom?). The Bo-105 light observation helicopters will be retired without replacement. All helicopter operations will be consolidated on Gilze-Rijen airbase allowing the closure of Soesterberg (formerly known as Camp New Amsterdam with the USAFE) The HAWK missile system will be retired and replaced by ex-German PATRIOTs. Entry of PATRIOT PAC-III into Dutch service will be delayed by two years. The Dutch navy will loose two minesweepers and four frigates (leaving ten of each in service) and (aviation related) will have to retire all remaining P-3s, leaving no MARPAT aircraft in Dutch service. They (obviously) will also not undergo an upgrade that was already underway on some aircraft. Their base, NAS Valkenburg will be closed and a previously planned relocation to De Kooy/Den Helder is obviously cancelled. The only remaining naval aviation assets will be a few dozen Lynx helicopters at De Kooy. In addition to retiring its MLRS rocket artillery and a number of howitzers the army will have to retire their 'Pantserrups tegen luchtdoelen' (PRTL), which is a mechanized anti-aircraft system based on the Leopard I. Personnel levels will be reduced by 9000. Now, for those of you who are laughing about the small numbers, I have to remind you that the Netherlands is a rather small country with 16 million inhabitants who (obviously) realise that they're not likely to be considered a superpower. As for the cut-backs: I realise that in light of government cut-backs on just about anything right now and the public's perceived lack of importance of military spending compared with spending on things like health care, education and law enforcement some of these decisions are inevitable. I generally think that a little reform wouldn't hurt, since equipment wise especially the army still seems to be stuck in the Cold War. They've invested some in lighter vehicles and (together with the Air Force) have formed an air mobile brigade, but they still have lots of heavy mechanized stuff (tanks, APCs and artillery). I can also understand retiring some of the F-16s, but retiring the P-3s and selling recently bought AH-64s really doesn't seem to make a whole lot of sense. The P-3s have seen a lot of useful service in recent years and the Apaches were bought specifically to support the air mobile brigade, which was formed specifically to deal with post cold war situations. Regards, Ralph Savelsberg |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ralph Savelsberg" wrote in message ... Just in the news during the last few days: The Dutch minister of Defence has announced (yet another) cutback. The Air Force will loose 29 F-16s, leaving 108 in service. Twente air base, which is one of three Dutch F-16 bases will be closed. Six out of 30 virtually brand-new AH-64Ds are to be sold (to whom?). The Bo-105 light observation helicopters will be retired without replacement. All helicopter operations will be consolidated on Gilze-Rijen airbase allowing the closure of Soesterberg (formerly known as Camp New Amsterdam with the USAFE) The HAWK missile system will be retired and replaced by ex-German PATRIOTs. Entry of PATRIOT PAC-III into Dutch service will be delayed by two years. The Dutch navy will loose two minesweepers and four frigates (leaving ten of each in service) and (aviation related) will have to retire all remaining P-3s, leaving no MARPAT aircraft in Dutch service. They (obviously) will also not undergo an upgrade that was already underway on some aircraft. Their base, NAS Valkenburg will be closed and a previously planned relocation to De Kooy/Den Helder is obviously cancelled. The only remaining naval aviation assets will be a few dozen Lynx helicopters at De Kooy. In addition to retiring its MLRS rocket artillery and a number of howitzers the army will have to retire their 'Pantserrups tegen luchtdoelen' (PRTL), which is a mechanized anti-aircraft system based on the Leopard I. Personnel levels will be reduced by 9000. Now, for those of you who are laughing about the small numbers, I have to remind you that the Netherlands is a rather small country with 16 million inhabitants who (obviously) realise that they're not likely to be considered a superpower. As for the cut-backs: I realise that in light of government cut-backs on just about anything right now and the public's perceived lack of importance of military spending compared with spending on things like health care, education and law enforcement some of these decisions are inevitable. I generally think that a little reform wouldn't hurt, since equipment wise especially the army still seems to be stuck in the Cold War. They've invested some in lighter vehicles and (together with the Air Force) have formed an air mobile brigade, but they still have lots of heavy mechanized stuff (tanks, APCs and artillery). I can also understand retiring some of the F-16s, but retiring the P-3s and selling recently bought AH-64s really doesn't seem to make a whole lot of sense. The P-3s have seen a lot of useful service in recent years and the Apaches were bought specifically to support the air mobile brigade, which was formed specifically to deal with post cold war situations. Regards, Ralph Savelsberg They need the money so that they can distribute free heroin to their drug-addicted population, and then support half of them with their welfare system. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
When exactly did Holland become part of Canada, it's sounds like it's a
Canadian plan... Ralph Savelsberg ) writes: Just in the news during the last few days: The Dutch minister of Defence has announced (yet another) cutback. The Air Force will loose 29 F-16s, leaving 108 in service. Twente air base, which is one of three Dutch F-16 bases will be closed. Six out of 30 virtually brand-new AH-64Ds are to be sold (to whom?). The Bo-105 light observation helicopters will be retired without replacement. All helicopter operations will be consolidated on Gilze-Rijen airbase allowing the closure of Soesterberg (formerly known as Camp New Amsterdam with the USAFE) The HAWK missile system will be retired and replaced by ex-German PATRIOTs. Entry of PATRIOT PAC-III into Dutch service will be delayed by two years. The Dutch navy will loose two minesweepers and four frigates (leaving ten of each in service) and (aviation related) will have to retire all remaining P-3s, leaving no MARPAT aircraft in Dutch service. They (obviously) will also not undergo an upgrade that was already underway on some aircraft. Their base, NAS Valkenburg will be closed and a previously planned relocation to De Kooy/Den Helder is obviously cancelled. The only remaining naval aviation assets will be a few dozen Lynx helicopters at De Kooy. In addition to retiring its MLRS rocket artillery and a number of howitzers the army will have to retire their 'Pantserrups tegen luchtdoelen' (PRTL), which is a mechanized anti-aircraft system based on the Leopard I. Personnel levels will be reduced by 9000. Now, for those of you who are laughing about the small numbers, I have to remind you that the Netherlands is a rather small country with 16 million inhabitants who (obviously) realise that they're not likely to be considered a superpower. As for the cut-backs: I realise that in light of government cut-backs on just about anything right now and the public's perceived lack of importance of military spending compared with spending on things like health care, education and law enforcement some of these decisions are inevitable. I generally think that a little reform wouldn't hurt, since equipment wise especially the army still seems to be stuck in the Cold War. They've invested some in lighter vehicles and (together with the Air Force) have formed an air mobile brigade, but they still have lots of heavy mechanized stuff (tanks, APCs and artillery). I can also understand retiring some of the F-16s, but retiring the P-3s and selling recently bought AH-64s really doesn't seem to make a whole lot of sense. The P-3s have seen a lot of useful service in recent years and the Apaches were bought specifically to support the air mobile brigade, which was formed specifically to deal with post cold war situations. Regards, Ralph Savelsberg |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Thomas J. Paladino Jr." wrote in message ...
They need the money so that they can distribute free heroin to their drug-addicted population, and then support half of them with their welfare system. Spoken like a true inbred, grossly overweigth, redneck with an IQ less than his shoe size and a shotgun to compensate for all that. Can we please lose the brainless stereotyping now? Rob |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Rob van Riel wrote: Ralph Savelsberg wrote in message ... mechanized stuff (tanks, APCs and artillery). I can also understand retiring some of the F-16s, but retiring the P-3s and selling recently bought AH-64s really doesn't seem to make a whole lot of sense. The P-3s have seen a lot of useful service in recent years and the Apaches were I have to agree with you on this. The P-3s especially are among the few military assets that are actually doing something usefull most of the time (no criticism of the other parts, I'm glad we're not involved in shooting wars on a regular basis). With these gone, we'll have everyone and his kid sister dumping oil and other waste off our coastline. At least I didn't vote for any of these clowns. Rob Neither did I, although I'm not so sure what would have happened if a coalition government of CDA (Christian Democrats) and PvdA (Social Democrats), whom I voted for, would have done all that differently. They too would have cut back on defence spending, although they might have made different choices. Actually the VVD (liberal party, although unlike 'liberals' in the American sense, they're actually conservative), which is a part of the current coalition governemnt made campaign promises about spending more on defence. Typical. Regards, Ralph Savelsberg |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: 1988 "Aces High" (Military Airplanes) Hardcover Edition Book | J.R. Sinclair | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | August 23rd 04 05:18 AM |
AOPA Sells-Out California Pilots in Military Airspace Grab? | Larry Dighera | Instrument Flight Rules | 12 | April 26th 04 06:12 PM |
FA: 7 Vintage Polish Military Airplane Toy Model Kits - Ends Tomorrow | Disgo | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | February 21st 04 02:38 PM |
NEW STO Military and Aircraft Scale Models | Michael Knab | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | December 16th 03 01:12 PM |
S.A. Military Aviation Pioneer Dies | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | June 30th 03 10:52 PM |