![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Does anyone know of any Experimental - Amateur Built gliders that have
operating limitations which allow cloud flying with a Turn and Bank? Does anyone know what many type certified designs (Schweizer 1-34 comes to mind) had to prove to be allowed to cloud fly with a Turn and Bank installed? I have a copy of the Basic Glider Criteria Handbook in the mail, perhaps that will provide some insight into this question. Shawn Knickerbocker will be presenting on cloud flying at the SSA convention on thursday. From visiting with Shawn, it should be a fantastic presentation and I hope to see you all there! |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My Nimbus 2C does. It's expressly stated in the POH and the certification
(Experimentat EX&R) Of course, getting the proper logbook signoffs for a "gyro panel" is somethng else. Bill Daniels wrote in message ups.com... Does anyone know of any Experimental - Amateur Built gliders that have operating limitations which allow cloud flying with a Turn and Bank? Does anyone know what many type certified designs (Schweizer 1-34 comes to mind) had to prove to be allowed to cloud fly with a Turn and Bank installed? I have a copy of the Basic Glider Criteria Handbook in the mail, perhaps that will provide some insight into this question. Shawn Knickerbocker will be presenting on cloud flying at the SSA convention on thursday. From visiting with Shawn, it should be a fantastic presentation and I hope to see you all there! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 5, 12:57 pm, "Bill Daniels" bildan@comcast-dot-net wrote:
My Nimbus 2C does. It's expressly stated in the POH and the certification (Experimentat EX&R) Of course, getting the proper logbook signoffs for a "gyro panel" is somethng else. Bill Daniels But the real question is would you want to fly a Nimbus 2 in those conditions? Mine was a handful in a spin, not sure I would want to try it in IMC. Tim |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hmm, Mine says "Spins prohibited". However, with the fixed stab, it's a
very stable, spin resistent platform so I don't see why not. Most of the airplanes I flew IMC were "Spin prohibited" too - never spun one IMC. Bill Daniels "Tim Taylor" wrote in message oups.com... On Feb 5, 12:57 pm, "Bill Daniels" bildan@comcast-dot-net wrote: My Nimbus 2C does. It's expressly stated in the POH and the certification (Experimentat EX&R) Of course, getting the proper logbook signoffs for a "gyro panel" is somethng else. Bill Daniels But the real question is would you want to fly a Nimbus 2 in those conditions? Mine was a handful in a spin, not sure I would want to try it in IMC. Tim |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 5, 4:22 pm, "Bill Daniels" bildan@comcast-dot-net wrote:
Hmm, Mine says "Spins prohibited". However, with the fixed stab, it's a very stable, spin resistent platform so I don't see why not. Most of the airplanes I flew IMC were "Spin prohibited" too - never spun one IMC. Bill Daniels "Tim Taylor" wrote in message oups.com... On Feb 5, 12:57 pm, "Bill Daniels" bildan@comcast-dot-net wrote: My Nimbus 2C does. It's expressly stated in the POH and the certification (Experimentat EX&R) Of course, getting the proper logbook signoffs for a "gyro panel" is somethng else. Bill Daniels But the real question is would you want to fly a Nimbus 2 in those conditions? Mine was a handful in a spin, not sure I would want to try it in IMC. Tim yea the experimental exhibition and racing is different as it has a POH which allows cloud flying. With amatuer built I must somehow prove that it is safe to take the glider into clouds. Finding the standards to prove it against has proven difficult, but I got my copy of the Basic Glider Criteria handbook and it is looking promising. Funny how pure glider pilots seem to think that any encounter with clouds must result in an immediate loss of control. Properly instrumented and most importantly, properly trained, it really is no problem. Twins, Airliners, and even many single engine planes that are not certified for spins fly in IMC every day with no problems. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The issue isn't spinning. In fact, holding the glider in a spin may well be
the best way of exiting a cloud after losing control. Even if the glider isn't cleared for spinning there's a good chance you won't have a problem if you carry out a proper spin recovery once you are well clear of the cloud. The real danger is the combination of over-speeding and simultaneously pulling excessive g in an attempt to recover control of the glider while there is no pitch reference. David Starer wrote in message ups.com... On Feb 5, 4:22 pm, "Bill Daniels" bildan@comcast-dot-net wrote: Hmm, Mine says "Spins prohibited". However, with the fixed stab, it's a very stable, spin resistent platform so I don't see why not. Most of the airplanes I flew IMC were "Spin prohibited" too - never spun one IMC. Bill Daniels "Tim Taylor" wrote in message oups.com... On Feb 5, 12:57 pm, "Bill Daniels" bildan@comcast-dot-net wrote: My Nimbus 2C does. It's expressly stated in the POH and the certification (Experimentat EX&R) Of course, getting the proper logbook signoffs for a "gyro panel" is somethng else. Bill Daniels But the real question is would you want to fly a Nimbus 2 in those conditions? Mine was a handful in a spin, not sure I would want to try it in IMC. Tim yea the experimental exhibition and racing is different as it has a POH which allows cloud flying. With amatuer built I must somehow prove that it is safe to take the glider into clouds. Finding the standards to prove it against has proven difficult, but I got my copy of the Basic Glider Criteria handbook and it is looking promising. Funny how pure glider pilots seem to think that any encounter with clouds must result in an immediate loss of control. Properly instrumented and most importantly, properly trained, it really is no problem. Twins, Airliners, and even many single engine planes that are not certified for spins fly in IMC every day with no problems. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The issue isn't spinning. In fact, holding the glider in a spin may well be
the best way of exiting a cloud after losing control. Even if the glider isn't cleared for spinning there's a good chance you won't have a problem if you carry out a proper spin recovery once you are well clear of the cloud. The real danger is the combination of over-speeding and simultaneously pulling excessive g in an attempt to recover control of the glider while there is no pitch reference. David Starer wrote in message ups.com... On Feb 5, 4:22 pm, "Bill Daniels" bildan@comcast-dot-net wrote: Hmm, Mine says "Spins prohibited". However, with the fixed stab, it's a very stable, spin resistent platform so I don't see why not. Most of the airplanes I flew IMC were "Spin prohibited" too - never spun one IMC. Bill Daniels "Tim Taylor" wrote in message oups.com... On Feb 5, 12:57 pm, "Bill Daniels" bildan@comcast-dot-net wrote: My Nimbus 2C does. It's expressly stated in the POH and the certification (Experimentat EX&R) Of course, getting the proper logbook signoffs for a "gyro panel" is somethng else. Bill Daniels But the real question is would you want to fly a Nimbus 2 in those conditions? Mine was a handful in a spin, not sure I would want to try it in IMC. Tim yea the experimental exhibition and racing is different as it has a POH which allows cloud flying. With amatuer built I must somehow prove that it is safe to take the glider into clouds. Finding the standards to prove it against has proven difficult, but I got my copy of the Basic Glider Criteria handbook and it is looking promising. Funny how pure glider pilots seem to think that any encounter with clouds must result in an immediate loss of control. Properly instrumented and most importantly, properly trained, it really is no problem. Twins, Airliners, and even many single engine planes that are not certified for spins fly in IMC every day with no problems. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Glider only" ratings, you mean? Usually, "pure" means no motor in the glider. yea sorry about that, you know what i meant. seem to think that any encounter with clouds must result in an immediate loss of control. Properly instrumented and most importantly, properly trained, Kind of begs the question, doesn't? "You won't have problems if you do everything right". Yep. it really is no problem. Turbulence, icing, lightning, hypoxia, other gliders and airplanes - no problem? Well this is where cloud flying has gotten its bad rap. Turbulence is a given, its going to be there in almost any type of soaring you do. Icing is avoidable, Lightning is avoidable. Im not talking about using a Tstorm to get diamond altitude a la Piggot. Ive got a stronger self preservation gene than that. Hypoxia is avoidable. There is a way to be smart about this type of operation. Unfortunately it seems that the ones who perhaps havent been quite so much have spoiled it for the rest of us. Twins, Airliners, and even many single engine planes that are not certified for spins fly in IMC every day with no problems. How much thermalling near stall do they do ;) ? And isn't flight into IMC where lots of those single engine planes have the most problems? haha very clever. This goes back to being smart about the operation. typical flying speeds in cloud are higher, in fact much higher than normal thermalling speeds. for one thing the lift is so much stronger that the low speed really isnt necessary. second, and most importantly it gives you a good cushion on stalling. And the power traffic regularly slows to within 1.3 times the stall speed on approach. Id say that most of the problems "those single engine planes" encounter during IMC are pilot problems, not airplane. I'm looking forward to Shawn's presentation at the convention. I've read many of the stories from the older Sailplane and Gliding magazines about cloud flight back before GPS, and it sounded like a quite an adventure. I particularly enjoyed the ones that had sentences like this: "As I exited the cloud at 14,000', I looked down to see nothing but water...". Usually meant the English Channel. Not a happy place in a 30:1 glider with iced up wings. Can't wait to meet you there. Tony 2000 miles from any water that a ice cube couldnt glide across |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 5, 10:50 pm, wrote:
"Glider only" ratings, you mean? Usually, "pure" means no motor in the glider. yea sorry about that, you know what i meant. seem to think that any encounter with clouds must result in an immediate loss of control. Properly instrumented and most importantly, properly trained, Kind of begs the question, doesn't? "You won't have problems if you do everything right". Yep. it really is no problem. Turbulence, icing, lightning, hypoxia, other gliders and airplanes - no problem? Well this is where cloud flying has gotten its bad rap. Turbulence is a given, its going to be there in almost any type of soaring you do. Icing is avoidable, Lightning is avoidable. Im not talking about using a Tstorm to get diamond altitude a la Piggot. Ive got a stronger self preservation gene than that. Hypoxia is avoidable. There is a way to be smart about this type of operation. Unfortunately it seems that the ones who perhaps havent been quite so much have spoiled it for the rest of us. You have to remember that Eric is to soaring what the little old lady driving in the short 405themovie is when you are replying to him ![]() http://www.405themovie.com/Images/Ph...l/52Co0025.JPG http://www.405themovie.com/Images/Ph...ull/Sc0021.JPG Let the flame wars begin LOL Roll on summer... Cheers Al |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Some flying vids I made... | [email protected] | Piloting | 40 | January 31st 07 10:11 PM |
Cloud Flying | Shawn Knickerbocker | Soaring | 0 | August 26th 06 03:27 PM |
Most reliable homebuilt helicopter? | tom pettit | Home Built | 35 | September 29th 05 02:24 PM |
Mini-500 Accident Analysis | Dennis Fetters | Rotorcraft | 16 | September 3rd 05 11:35 AM |
the thrill of flying interview is here! | Dudley Henriques | Piloting | 0 | October 21st 03 07:41 PM |