![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Peter Dohm" wrote in message ... The enabling technology had just reached a level at which there were a number of contenders, some of whom were French, at the time of the Wrights' first flight--so that there was an element of luck in being first, in addition to the obvious hard work and dedication. However, from what I have heard, the Wrights and the US Patent Office were also the principal reason that aviation technology in the US was virtually frozen for the next decade. That allowed the French, who were and still are very strong contenders in engineering and medicine, to make most of the contibutions to aviation. Regrettably, there is reason to suppose that the same is now happening to us with regard to computer software--although the beneficiaries appear to be different. Peter Just repeating what I have heard Welcome to the down side of capitalism.... Luke |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Peter Dohm" wrote in
: "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message ... "Ray O'Hara" wrote in : "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message ... -- What started it all........... if you go to the smithsonian you can impress your friends by pointing out the "flyer" is hanging higher than it ever flew. Or that while the US invented the airplane, it was France that made all the major advances with it for the next decade. The enabling technology had just reached a level at which there were a number of contenders, some of whom were French, at the time of the Wrights' first flight--so that there was an element of luck in being first, in addition to the obvious hard work and dedication. However, from what I have heard, the Wrights and the US Patent Office were also the principal reason that aviation technology in the US was virtually frozen for the next decade. That allowed the French, who were and still are very strong contenders in engineering and medicine, to make most of the contibutions to aviation. Regrettably, there is reason to suppose that the same is now happening to us with regard to computer software--although the beneficiaries appear to be different. Peter Just repeating what I have heard True enough. While the Wrights were suing everyone using their "wing warping" technology the French were holding air races and inventing ailerons and rotary engines and the tractor configuration. When WWI broke out the allies turned to France to supply them with planes. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Peter Dohm" wrote in
: "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message ... "Ray O'Hara" wrote in : "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message ... -- What started it all........... if you go to the smithsonian you can impress your friends by pointing out the "flyer" is hanging higher than it ever flew. Or that while the US invented the airplane, it was France that made all the major advances with it for the next decade. The enabling technology had just reached a level at which there were a number of contenders, some of whom were French, at the time of the Wrights' first flight--so that there was an element of luck in being first, in addition to the obvious hard work and dedication. However, from what I have heard, the Wrights and the US Patent Office were also the principal reason that aviation technology in the US was virtually frozen for the next decade. That allowed the French, who were and still are very strong contenders in engineering and medicine, to make most of the contibutions to aviation. Regrettably, there is reason to suppose that the same is now happening to us with regard to computer software--although the beneficiaries appear to be different. Peter Just repeating what I have heard True enough. While the Wrights were suing everyone using their "wing warping" technology the French were holding air races and inventing ailerons and rotary engines and the tractor configuration. When WWI broke out the allies turned to France to supply them with planes. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Was Alberto Santos-Dumont
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alberto_Santos-Dumont "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message ... -- What started it all........... |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Was Alberto Santos-Dumont
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alberto_Santos-Dumont "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message ... -- What started it all........... |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Luke" skrev i en meddelelse ... "Peter Dohm" wrote in message ... The enabling technology had just reached a level at which there were a number of contenders, some of whom were French, at the time of the Wrights' first flight--so that there was an element of luck in being first, in addition to the obvious hard work and dedication. However, from what I have heard, the Wrights and the US Patent Office were also the principal reason that aviation technology in the US was virtually frozen for the next decade. That allowed the French, who were and still are very strong contenders in engineering and medicine, to make most of the contibutions to aviation. Regrettably, there is reason to suppose that the same is now happening to us with regard to computer software--although the beneficiaries appear to be different. Peter Just repeating what I have heard Welcome to the down side of capitalism.... There's only one? |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Luke" skrev i en meddelelse ... "Peter Dohm" wrote in message ... The enabling technology had just reached a level at which there were a number of contenders, some of whom were French, at the time of the Wrights' first flight--so that there was an element of luck in being first, in addition to the obvious hard work and dedication. However, from what I have heard, the Wrights and the US Patent Office were also the principal reason that aviation technology in the US was virtually frozen for the next decade. That allowed the French, who were and still are very strong contenders in engineering and medicine, to make most of the contibutions to aviation. Regrettably, there is reason to suppose that the same is now happening to us with regard to computer software--although the beneficiaries appear to be different. Peter Just repeating what I have heard Welcome to the down side of capitalism.... There's only one? |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
While capitalism is not perfect, it is the better than the alternative(s)
IMHO... "Blume, Alf" AlfBlume(a)hotmaildotcom wrote in message k... "Luke" skrev i en meddelelse ... "Peter Dohm" wrote in message ... The enabling technology had just reached a level at which there were a number of contenders, some of whom were French, at the time of the Wrights' first flight--so that there was an element of luck in being first, in addition to the obvious hard work and dedication. However, from what I have heard, the Wrights and the US Patent Office were also the principal reason that aviation technology in the US was virtually frozen for the next decade. That allowed the French, who were and still are very strong contenders in engineering and medicine, to make most of the contibutions to aviation. Regrettably, there is reason to suppose that the same is now happening to us with regard to computer software--although the beneficiaries appear to be different. Peter Just repeating what I have heard Welcome to the down side of capitalism.... There's only one? |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
While capitalism is not perfect, it is the better than the alternative(s)
IMHO... "Blume, Alf" AlfBlume(a)hotmaildotcom wrote in message k... "Luke" skrev i en meddelelse ... "Peter Dohm" wrote in message ... The enabling technology had just reached a level at which there were a number of contenders, some of whom were French, at the time of the Wrights' first flight--so that there was an element of luck in being first, in addition to the obvious hard work and dedication. However, from what I have heard, the Wrights and the US Patent Office were also the principal reason that aviation technology in the US was virtually frozen for the next decade. That allowed the French, who were and still are very strong contenders in engineering and medicine, to make most of the contibutions to aviation. Regrettably, there is reason to suppose that the same is now happening to us with regard to computer software--although the beneficiaries appear to be different. Peter Just repeating what I have heard Welcome to the down side of capitalism.... There's only one? |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
And the alternative is? What? Having to live on what you produce?
"Skyway" wrote in message . .. While capitalism is not perfect, it is the better than the alternative(s) IMHO... "Blume, Alf" AlfBlume(a)hotmaildotcom wrote in message k... "Luke" skrev i en meddelelse ... "Peter Dohm" wrote in message ... The enabling technology had just reached a level at which there were a number of contenders, some of whom were French, at the time of the Wrights' first flight--so that there was an element of luck in being first, in addition to the obvious hard work and dedication. However, from what I have heard, the Wrights and the US Patent Office were also the principal reason that aviation technology in the US was virtually frozen for the next decade. That allowed the French, who were and still are very strong contenders in engineering and medicine, to make most of the contibutions to aviation. Regrettably, there is reason to suppose that the same is now happening to us with regard to computer software--although the beneficiaries appear to be different. Peter Just repeating what I have heard Welcome to the down side of capitalism.... There's only one? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Over Sydney - 001index.jpg (0/1) | Mitchell Holman | Aviation Photos | 0 | December 15th 06 02:24 PM |
Over Sydney - 001index.jpg (1/1) | Mitchell Holman | Aviation Photos | 0 | December 15th 06 02:24 PM |
Fly Argentina - 001index.jpg (1/1) | Mitchell Holman | Aviation Photos | 0 | December 9th 06 02:24 AM |