![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
60-day trial, $10 registration fee, free database updates
http://www.razorsedgesoft.com/airplan.htm Call it SPAM if you want... thought you might be interested... as close to free as I can make it. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote)
60-day trial, $10 registration fee, free database updates http://www.razorsedgesoft.com/airplan.htm Call it SPAM if you want... thought you might be interested... as close to free as I can make it. For new lurkers to r.a.p., how about you introduce yourself and your product? For folks who have been around a while, what's up? You went away, now you're back. Is it the same software? What's changed? Will you be at OSH? Good to hear from you again. Montblack |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 15, 11:15 pm, "Montblack" Y4_NOT!...
wrote: wrote) 60-day trial, $10 registration fee, free database updates http://www.razorsedgesoft.com/airplan.htm Call it SPAM if you want... thought you might be interested... as close to free as I can make it. For new lurkers to r.a.p., how about you introduce yourself and your product? For folks who have been around a while, what's up? You went away, now you're back. Is it the same software? What's changed? Will you be at OSH? Good to hear from you again. Montblack Hi Montblack. Yes its the same software. I wanted a way to be able to keep providing at least USA data to my long-time customers, so I managed to find a lower cost website where I could post the data. I am subsidizing the site by selling $10 licenses for the software, but the database will always be free to update. The flight planning software market is so saturated with both free and $100+ products that I really couldn't afford to sink too much time or money into promoting my product. By making it a shareware low cost for registration planner, I expect that I can at least keep it out in the world and allow those who bought it over the past 10 years to keep using it with current nav data. Unfortunately, folks outside the USA won't get new data because the DAFIF is not available anymore... I may be at Osh this year, but not to promote this software. I can't afford a booth for that purpose. I am doing some other things aviation related that I may go to Osh this year to help promote. I also have been doing some avionics design under contract for a company that makes an EFIS system, which has been keeping me busy. If I go to Osh this year, I'll see if I can make your party. Its a long way from the main campground out to where you guys hang out, and I usually like to take in the Theater in the Woods or aviation movies at night. Dean Wilkinson |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 16, 10:25 am, wrote:
The flight planning software market is so saturated with both free and $100+ products that I really couldn't afford to sink too much time or money into promoting my product. By making it a shareware low cost for registration planner, I expect that I can at least keep it out in the world and allow those who bought it over the past 10 years to keep using it with current nav data. Unfortunately, folks outside the USA won't get new data because the DAFIF is not available anymore... That's nice of you not to abandon your old customers. Voyager on the other hand has a different point of view. After old customers spent $150 and $75/year for updates, they now require these same customers to pay another $100 for the new version. Then again, maybe that's what they need to do to stay above water in such a saturated market. I also have been doing some avionics design under contract for a company that makes an EFIS system, which has been keeping me busy. Being in the software development in order to support my aviation habit, I secretly dream about working for an avionics company working on EFIS or MFD systems. Unfortunately, Long Island has very few cutting-edge aviation companies despite its rich heritage in aviation. It must be nice to have money actually going IN to your wallet while doing something related to aviation. Marco |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 16, 1:36 pm, "Marco Leon" wrote:
On Feb 16, 10:25 am, wrote: The flight planning software market is so saturated with both free and $100+ products that I really couldn't afford to sink too much time or money into promoting my product. By making it a shareware low cost for registration planner, I expect that I can at least keep it out in the world and allow those who bought it over the past 10 years to keep using it with current nav data. Unfortunately, folks outside the USA won't get new data because the DAFIF is not available anymore... That's nice of you not to abandon your old customers. Voyager on the other hand has a different point of view. After old customers spent $150 and $75/year for updates, they now require these same customers to pay another $100 for the new version. Then again, maybe that's what they need to do to stay above water in such a saturated market. I also have been doing some avionics design under contract for a company that makes an EFIS system, which has been keeping me busy. Being in the software development in order to support my aviation habit, I secretly dream about working for an avionics company working on EFIS or MFD systems. Unfortunately, Long Island has very few cutting-edge aviation companies despite its rich heritage in aviation. It must be nice to have money actually going IN to your wallet while doing something related to aviation. Marco Be careful what you wish for... my experience is that many small GA avionics companies are low paying sweatshops. The one I am doing contract work for right now (can't say who it is) isn't like that, but another that I actually worked at was (Chelton Flight Systems). The contract work I am doing brings in only a fraction of my actual salary from my day job, but that is because I feel like it would be too risky to go to work for a small avionics company full-time, at least not until they have really established themselves in the marketplace like Garmin has. Doing it part time limits the amount I make. Dean |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Marco Leon" wrote in message ups.com... Being in the software development in order to support my aviation habit, I secretly dream about working for an avionics company working on EFIS or MFD systems. Unfortunately, Long Island has very few cutting-edge aviation companies despite its rich heritage in aviation. It must be nice to have money actually going IN to your wallet while doing something related to aviation. Marco It's not just nice to work in aviation, it's inconceivable that I could be happy working in any job outside aviation. It's worse than any addiction the medical community recognizes. I grew up around airports -- Dad was an A&P. I got a degree in Aero Eng and now have 30 years in the industry; 17 years USAF (Maj Ret.) and 13 years in avionics. The downside to this industry is that you have to go where the jobs are. Everyone has their priorities. For some it's family. Others just have to live in [insert town here]. I have to live where I can do the work I have to do. It's taken me back and forth across this country 4 times. Can't say I've lived any place I truly didn't like, though I did like some places better than others. Overall, I'll say I prefer to avoid big cities so I probably won't go back to LA or Long Island. If you're serious, I know where there are open positions doing just what you describe. Let me know. Gerry |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 16, 8:34 pm, "Gerry Caron" wrote:
"Marco Leon" wrote in message ups.com... Being in the software development in order to support my aviation habit, I secretly dream about working for an avionics company working on EFIS or MFD systems. Unfortunately, Long Island has very few cutting-edge aviation companies despite its rich heritage in aviation. It must be nice to have money actually going IN to your wallet while doing something related to aviation. Marco It's not just nice to work in aviation, it's inconceivable that I could be happy working in any job outside aviation. It's worse than any addiction the medical community recognizes. I grew up around airports -- Dad was an A&P. I got a degree in Aero Eng and now have 30 years in the industry; 17 years USAF (Maj Ret.) and 13 years in avionics. The downside to this industry is that you have to go where the jobs are. Everyone has their priorities. For some it's family. Others just have to live in [insert town here]. I have to live where I can do the work I have to do. It's taken me back and forth across this country 4 times. Can't say I've lived any place I truly didn't like, though I did like some places better than others. Overall, I'll say I prefer to avoid big cities so I probably won't go back to LA or Long Island. If you're serious, I know where there are open positions doing just what you describe. Let me know. Gerry I could have a job tommorrow at Collins, but I don't want to live in Cedar Rapids Iowa. Likewise, I passed on two job offers from Boeing to work on the 787 because I didn't want to move my family to Seattle. I worked there for 8 years on the 777 but that was when I was a younger man and single. The salary offer from Boeing wasn't enough to make up the cost of housing differential between where I live now and the Puget Sound area. I would have to trade my 3700 square foot home for a 2 bedroom shack for the same selling price! I enjoyed working for Boeing, and other companies I have worked for. I would advise everyone to steer clear of Chelton Flight Systems. It was absolutely the worst place I have ever worked, and that includes all the minimum wage jobs I had before college!!!! I have some real horror stories from that job... Dean |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 18, 12:14 am, boB wrote:
wrote: 60-day trial, $10 registration fee, free database updates http://www.razorsedgesoft.com/airplan.htm Call it SPAM if you want... thought you might be interested... as close to free as I can make it. Well. I don't call it spam after looking through it all evening. Most of my flying is/was VFR below 1000 feet agl with a sectional on my knee but I really like the features (some that I don't understand yet) included in your program. I'm reading through the manual and can't find out how to get sectionals in the Airplan chunk format for MSFS. My sectional files are all set up for MSFS calibrated for use in FSM MovingMap (by Rana Hossain) b y Matt Fox The file extensions for the sectional charts are JGW - PRJ and JPG Any help about re-formating these files would be appreciated or even better, a place to download sectionals already in Airmap Chunk Format. $10.00 and free updates --- that IS about as close to free as you can get. -- boB copter.six Bob, I have a software program that user's can use to carve up sectional charts into the chunks. I used to provide chart chunks to my customers, but without enough sales at a price point that was comparable to the other flight planners, I couldn't afford to keep putting them out. By making AirPlan shareware at a low price without chart chunks, it becomes a low maintenance shareware program that I can afford to keep online and give free updates for... Dean |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message oups.com... On Feb 16, 8:34 pm, "Gerry Caron" wrote: "Marco Leon" wrote in message ups.com... Being in the software development in order to support my aviation habit, I secretly dream about working for an avionics company working on EFIS or MFD systems. Unfortunately, Long Island has very few cutting-edge aviation companies despite its rich heritage in aviation. It must be nice to have money actually going IN to your wallet while doing something related to aviation. Marco It's not just nice to work in aviation, it's inconceivable that I could be happy working in any job outside aviation. It's worse than any addiction the medical community recognizes. I grew up around airports -- Dad was an A&P. I got a degree in Aero Eng and now have 30 years in the industry; 17 years USAF (Maj Ret.) and 13 years in avionics. The downside to this industry is that you have to go where the jobs are. Everyone has their priorities. For some it's family. Others just have to live in [insert town here]. I have to live where I can do the work I have to do. It's taken me back and forth across this country 4 times. Can't say I've lived any place I truly didn't like, though I did like some places better than others. Overall, I'll say I prefer to avoid big cities so I probably won't go back to LA or Long Island. If you're serious, I know where there are open positions doing just what you describe. Let me know. Gerry I could have a job tommorrow at Collins, but I don't want to live in Cedar Rapids Iowa. Likewise, I passed on two job offers from Boeing to work on the 787 because I didn't want to move my family to Seattle. I worked there for 8 years on the 777 but that was when I was a younger man and single. The salary offer from Boeing wasn't enough to make up the cost of housing differential between where I live now and the Puget Sound area. I would have to trade my 3700 square foot home for a 2 bedroom shack for the same selling price! I enjoyed working for Boeing, and other companies I have worked for. I would advise everyone to steer clear of Chelton Flight Systems. It was absolutely the worst place I have ever worked, and that includes all the minimum wage jobs I had before college!!!! I have some real horror stories from that job... Dean I understand. I work for Collins, but not in Cedar Rapids. I'm in Melbourne FL. It's not heaven, but it's preferable (to me) to Cedar Rapids. The disadvantage is that Melbourne is a smaller organization with fewer opportunities. The advantage is that Melbourne is small enough that you know almost everybody. I get most of the benefit of a large corporation with few of the drawbacks. For me, it is worth the trade-offs. In recent years, Collins has grown and about half the company is somewhere other than Cedar Rapids. I have worked for small avionics companies. One is no longer in business (it was bought by the other company.) The other still exists, but is no longer in avionics. I gained a lot of experience, but you are correct to watch out for the small avionics companies. They tend to be undercapitalized; so pay, benefits, and resources are often low. Personalities are always a big factor in a small company, and it often works to the detriment of employee satisfaction. My point was that if you truly want to work in aviation, it's quite possible to make a decent living doing so. You just have to realize that it can be cyclical and you may have to move around to stay in the industry. When I got laid off from my last job (because they shut down the operation), I could have found a job locally; but it wouldn't have been in aviation. So, I moved to Melbourne. Gerry |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Best Flight Planning Software for a jet? | CaptainCraig | Piloting | 2 | September 8th 06 02:50 AM |
Flight Planning Software | Chris G. | Piloting | 22 | July 4th 05 06:33 PM |
Flight planning software | Cetacea | Instrument Flight Rules | 2 | May 13th 05 11:13 PM |
flight planning software | Russ Bird | Piloting | 1 | November 22nd 04 02:08 AM |
Flight Planning Software | Joe Allbritten | Piloting | 2 | December 21st 03 02:29 PM |