![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jay Honeck" wrote I'm looking for a better solution, because I want absolute realism. Unfortunately, in the absence of "force-feedback" rudder pedals, I don't know what else to try. Without knowing exactly how they are constructed, I'll take a guess, but you will get the general idea, and be able to alter it to meet your needs. A narrow steel plate could be through bolted to the pedals with some small machine screws, or liquid nails and screwed to the pedals, so the steel extends to the sides of, and clear of the housing. Drill a hole in the outboard part of the steel, and attach a spring, and run it back to the back of the housing, or a plate on the backside of the housing, or to the Kiwi, if the unit is permanently attached. The springs will attempt to keep the pedals centered, if a moderate amount of force is applied to both, evenly. When the one side goes towards the floor, it's spring will go slack, and the other side's spring will try to pull it back to neutral. You will also get the advantage of keeping the pedals for the big ones, since the little ones can not reach the pedals, and the springs will keep the units neutral. -- Jim in NC |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm looking for a better solution, because I want absolute realism.
Get in Atlas. :-/ you can't have absolute realism in a simulation. I can do that almost anytime. But I want absolute realism for the kids at the Childrens Museum. If I could take 'em all flying, I would -- but, since that's not possible, I want to give them the best "taste" of aviation possible, in the sim. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Tony" wrote in message
oups.com... because with an IO 540 this thing should want to turn really badly -- in the M20J I used rudder mostly to keep it on centerline during the early part of the takeoff roll, figured my little left and right arrows would have to do the job here. The Bravo tracked straight down the centerline without any help from me! This is supposed to be an accurate simulation, with no P effects? Gimme a break. TIO 540 in FSX, probably in FS9 also. Maybe you paused to wonder about 35" MAP; maybe you didn't. Auto-rudder is on by default; think of it as a perfect yaw damper. For those of you who get pleasure from the MSFS, more power to you. It did not work for me. There is a possiblity my mind has been poisoned to the sim experience, but probably not, I hoped it might be fun ro do on late nights. Oh well, it was a $20 experiment. The good news is, Yup. I'd say you plumbed the full depths of the package. Next time, just put the $20 in an envelope and mail it to me. that was cheap. Most of my 'experiments' cost a lot more than that. Want to know how to burn some VC's couple million in a startup venture? Talk to me! Why, you're just one of a kind, bragging up two major accomplishemnts in one post. Just wondering here if your education helped you in anyway to reach your station in life. |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 21:21:05 -0500, "Morgans"
wrote: "Peter R." wrote in message m... On 2/28/2007 4:42:05 PM, "Morgans" wrote: and all it can possibly do is to attract more sim nuts and sim discussion, that most of us very strongly do NOT want HERE! Am I a sim nut for answering his post? Uh, oh. I had rather you not, and that's just me; one out of hundreds, but what the heck - so much of that is going on - who can tell! g I guess that is my point. I don't think that either of you are sim nuts, or have difficulty understanding the difference (and reality issues) between real flying and simming. That title is very secure in another's holding. We need (IMHO) to try and get away from the sim postings. This group is losing their identity - and fast. A long post entirely about simming belongs in the sim group. That's all. Simple concept. Hey! With the weather we've been having the Deb hasn't been out of the hangar in 6 weeks and I've been suffering withdrawal for 5 1/2. I have been working on the elevator for the G-III, but keep finding reasons (procrastinating) for not closing one side. Then I had to replace the HD in my wife's computer which was supposed to be simple. Just take the one out of the shop being replaced by the new one, but things are never as simple as they should be. Two weeks later, her's is working, and I've rebuilt the new one in the shop twice. Now I only have to repair the OS on this machine and the one beside it. The thing about working on the shop computer is its next to the G-III making the G-III difficult to ignore which is slowly, oh so slowly causing me to get some work done on the G-III. Of course there are the plugs that need cleaning on the Deb ...Maybe I'd better call the guy who cleans the ramp. We are supposed to have some warm weather coming and I gotta put some hours on the engine before the annual. I gotta put some hours on me! Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
MXSMANIC is STOOPID writes:
Yes, it is, unless you're only using it as a toy. Most users of MSFS don't use it as a toy. It's very poor as a video game. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
george writes:
It might be Jay but I was playing with a Bantam B22 (Microlight) back then and the MSFS lost out. Twenty years ago. There was no Web twenty years ago; do you deny the existence of the Web now? -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tony writes:
My limited experience with Mooneys (I have only logged time in a Ranger simulate that Joe bar landing gear retraction, boys and girls and an M20J) tells me its soul is a beautiful, intellegent, and responsive woman. I wouldn't want mine to know I was messing around with another Mooney. "It's only simulation, dear, with a younger and faster model" would make my next flight difficult :-). Aircraft as woman? That's an attitude I have not encountered up to now. To me, aircraft are machines. I am only a sample of 1, but was led to understand controlling a sim airplane from a primititive keyboard was difficult. It was not. It's difficult for things like aerobatics. But some types of flying are doable, albeit not necessarily very realistic from a control standpoint. Some things work well with the keyboard, such as trim adjustments. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay Honeck writes:
The basic trouble is this: The CH pedals are differential, meaning that they are linked together, When you push the left one down, the right one comes back, and vice versa. Thus, the only way to keep pressure feedback on the pedals is to "train" yourself to keep pressue on BOTH pedals, so that when you push one, the pressure of your other foot is keeping you from slamming it all the way to the floor. What type of pressure feedback do you need? Aren't real rudder pedals connected in the same way? (One goes forward when the other goes back.) -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay Honeck writes:
But I want absolute realism for the kids at the Childrens Museum. If I could take 'em all flying, I would -- but, since that's not possible, I want to give them the best "taste" of aviation possible, in the sim. For the Children's Museum, I think you'll need a way to dial the realism up and down. Absolute beginners aren't going to do well with realism set high and will become frustrated, whereas those with more experience are going to find low realism disappointing. I suppose you could divided kids into groups by experience level, and then set the realism before each group is accommodated. Zooming off the runway is frustrating if you're not used to rudder control, but not having the rudder control when you need it for something after gaining a bit of experience is just as disappointing. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 Mxsmanic wrote: george writes: It might be Jay but I was playing with a Bantam B22 (Microlight) back then and the MSFS lost out. Twenty years ago. There was no Web twenty years ago; do you deny the existence of the Web now? Don't assume Web = Internet. World Wide Web existed 15 years ago; The Internet has been around for nearly double, if not longer. BL. - -- Brad Littlejohn | Email: Unix Systems Administrator, | Web + NewsMaster, BOFH.. Smeghead! ![]() PGP: 1024D/E319F0BF 6980 AAD6 7329 E9E6 D569 F620 C819 199A E319 F0BF -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFF59FkyBkZmuMZ8L8RAhApAJ9WMZgbswXzNBD1XhT0+s M+Fr5BfgCgzFMT ORUs2h1gEdHlLs6kCCYFbc8= =RZ8J -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
real life use of general aviation for this newsgroup | Tony | Piloting | 29 | February 9th 07 01:38 AM |
Real Life (in IMC) IFR training | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 36 | November 29th 06 02:03 PM |
REAL NAVY LIFE | B.C. Mallam | Naval Aviation | 2 | February 10th 05 01:20 AM |
Any real-life advice on inflight refueling? | tscottme | Naval Aviation | 5 | November 17th 04 03:56 PM |
Real-life flight planning | Paul Folbrecht | Piloting | 34 | February 10th 04 06:08 PM |