![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dallas wrote:
On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 19:50:42 GMT, ArtP wrote: I entered them on my WingX E6B software on my Axim and got PA=995 and DA=1925 Chart: PA: 1000 DA: 2000 Tom L's Sporty's E6B: PA: 998 DA: 1910 Dallas' Sporty's E6B: PA: 985 DA: 1894 ArtP's WingX E6B: PA: 995 DA: 1925 Excuse me, I need to take a couple of aspirin and lay down. Why? The reality is that these small variations really don't matter much anyway. Matt |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 29, 4:16 pm, Blanche wrote:
On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 17:59:35 GMT, Tom L. wrote: I entered the same numbers in my Sporty's E6B and got PA: 998 DA: 1910 Field Elev : 1165 Pressure Alt: 1000 Temp : 21 C DSSCalc - DA = 1931 CoPilot 1931 Garmin GPS 1930 If you want me to dig out the software I wrote based on "Flight Theory for Pilots", it's around here someplace... Blanche, my flight planning software AirPlan comes up with 1931 as well... Dean |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Blanche wrote in
: On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 17:59:35 GMT, Tom L. wrote: I entered the same numbers in my Sporty's E6B and got PA: 998 DA: 1910 Field Elev : 1165 Pressure Alt: 1000 Temp : 21 C DSSCalc - DA = 1931 CoPilot 1931 Garmin GPS 1930 If you want me to dig out the software I wrote based on "Flight Theory for Pilots", it's around here someplace... FWIW - My 13 year old Jeppesen TechStar for PA = 1000 and Temp = 21C also gives DA of 1931'. Worked just fine on my instrument written. -- Marty Shapiro Silicon Rallye Inc. (remove SPAMNOT to email me) |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi,
ArtP, which version of WingX do you have? I just ran it on the latest 2.0.4.3 and WingX came up with PA=1000' and DA=1931'. Interestingly with a dew point of 18C, WingX shows the DA going up to 2,213', that about a 300' difference not that much - would be interesting to see how it affects the performance numbers though. Keep well, Hilton "ArtP" wrote in message ... On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 17:20:43 GMT, "Dallas" wrote: Here's a sample problem: Field Elevation: 1165 Altimeter Setting: 30.10 Temperatu 21°C ___________________ I entered them on my WingX E6B software on my Axim and got PA=995 and DA=1925 |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 03:39:14 GMT, "Hilton" wrote:
Hi, ArtP, which version of WingX do you have? I just ran it on the latest 2.0.4.3 and WingX came up with PA=1000' and DA=1931'. My mistake. I had field elevation at 1160. At 1165, I get PA=1000' and DA=1932'. (2.0.4.3). |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 16:23:19 GMT, ArtP
wrote: On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 03:39:14 GMT, "Hilton" wrote: Hi, ArtP, which version of WingX do you have? I just ran it on the latest 2.0.4.3 and WingX came up with PA=1000' and DA=1931'. My mistake. I had field elevation at 1160. At 1165, I get PA=1000' and DA=1932'. (2.0.4.3). And I can't type either. It should read: PA=1000' and DA=1931'. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 22:22:56 GMT, Tom L. wrote:
Feel free to use the picture if you decide to call Sporty's. Here is the image I sent to Sporty's asking for an explanation: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v1...SportysE6B.jpg -- Dallas |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 29, 10:59 am, Tom L. wrote:
I entered the same numbers in my Sporty's E6B and got PA: 998 DA: 1910 Which is about the same as on the chart. Your reading of 2000 DA for 1000 PA is slightly off. You need at least 22 deg C for that. - Tom On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 17:20:43 GMT, "Dallas" wrote: My trusty Sporty's Electronic E6B does not agree with the Density Altitude Chart. My instructor is at a loss to explain the difference. Can anybody tell me what's going on? Here's a sample problem: Field Elevation: 1165 Altimeter Setting: 30.10 Temperatu 21°C ___________________ Using the standard chart: http://pacificrimprinting.com/densalt.pdf 30.1 in. Hg Pressure Altitude Conversion Factor: -165 Pressure Altitude: 1000 Density Altitude: 2000 ___________________ Sporty's E6B calculation: Pressure Altitude: 985 Density Altitude: 1894 The Sporty's pressure altitude is off by -15 feet and the density altitude is off by -106 feet. I can't imagine Sporty's marketing a flawed E6B, which one is inaccurate?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I got exactly the same... Jay Beckman PP-ASEL Lurking Chandler, AZ |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 30 Apr 2007 14:44:24 -0700, Jay B wrote:
I got exactly the same... I assume you got the same as mine? As I look at the photo of the 2 Sporty's that disagree I can see that the 3 year old one on the left doesn't have some of the menu items like Timer, °C, Reqclimb, etc. It's pretty clear that they have created a new version. http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v1...SportysE6B.jpg -- Dallas |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 1, 11:12 am, Dallas wrote:
On 30 Apr 2007 14:44:24 -0700, Jay B wrote: I got exactly the same... I assume you got the same as mine? As I look at the photo of the 2 Sporty's that disagree I can see that the 3 year old one on the left doesn't have some of the menu items like Timer, °C, Reqclimb, etc. It's pretty clear that they have created a new version. http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v1...BothSportysE6B... -- Dallas No, I got exactly the same as Tom, to whom I was replying... DA = 1910... Can't resolve your claim about new/old by the photos...too blurry. Jay B |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Air density question?? Pilot's Handbook ofAeronautical knowledge | karl gruber | Piloting | 9 | June 29th 06 08:28 PM |
VOR disparity | Rich S. | Home Built | 7 | January 4th 06 08:31 PM |
atmospheric density effects on airfoils | Stubby | General Aviation | 5 | June 24th 05 02:43 AM |
Student needs assistance density altitude calcs | hellothere.adelphia.net | Rotorcraft | 4 | August 19th 04 07:25 AM |
Pressure Altitude or Density Altitude | john smith | Piloting | 3 | July 22nd 04 10:48 AM |