![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2007-06-13, Thomas Borchert wrote:
Gwengler, a) parachute equipped airplane pilots tend to assume greater risk ("all I have to do is to pull the handle") Any kind of factual support for that statement? Even a hint would surprise me. Actually, percieved risk homeostatis is a well established psychological phenomena - i.e. given safety improvements, a person generally will take more risks until they are back at their normal level of risk comfort. So people with ABS brakes and airbags tend to drive faster (and possibly more recklessly) compared to when they didn't have ABS and airbags. It's been cited in many road safety studies. There's no reason why it wouldn't apply to aircraft. -- Yes, the Reply-To email address is valid. Oolite-Linux: an Elite tribute: http://oolite-linux.berlios.de |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2007-06-15, Thomas Borchert wrote:
Uhm, accident rates DO plummet - with ABS and all the other safety enhancements we have in modern cars. Now what does that do for the theories of psychology experts? If you look at the bigger picture, it's less clear. For example, when seatbelts were made mandatory in Britain, although the injury rate went down amongst occupants of cars, the injury rate went up for cyclists and pedestrians. Cars were crashing more often, but causing less harm to their occupants (but causing more risk, nonetheless, to those outside the vehicle). -- Yes, the Reply-To email address is valid. Oolite-Linux: an Elite tribute: http://oolite-linux.berlios.de |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dylan,
Actually, percieved risk homeostatis is a well established psychological phenomena Well, if you read the rest of the thread (and the literature), it is less than established, I'd say. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Food for thought, and the thing I think of when the subject of Cirrus
come up is the insurance costs. If you are comparing an older 182 with a brand new Cirrus, won't the hull-value part of your insurance eat you alive...? That's been one of the factors that gives me pause when considering one of the local groups that has shares of an SR22 for sale. (but it's not the only one). I guess it all really depends on your "mission" that you need an airplane for. -Ryan in Madison |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dylan Smith" wrote in message ... On 2007-06-15, Thomas Borchert wrote: Uhm, accident rates DO plummet - with ABS and all the other safety enhancements we have in modern cars. Now what does that do for the theories of psychology experts? If you look at the bigger picture, it's less clear. For example, when seatbelts were made mandatory in Britain, although the injury rate went down amongst occupants of cars, the injury rate went up for cyclists and pedestrians. Cars were crashing more often, but causing less harm to their occupants (but causing more risk, nonetheless, to those outside the vehicle). This is exactly the sort of behavior that I have observed on the street, without benefit of the statistics to back it up. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Should I upgrade from Skylane to Cirrus SR20? | Marc CYBW[_2_] | Piloting | 26 | June 19th 07 03:58 PM |
Comparison between Cirrus SR20/22 and Columbia(Lancair) 350/400 | Drakkar | Piloting | 20 | November 4th 06 06:20 AM |
Airplane in NYC is a Cirrus SR20 | A. Sinan Unur | Piloting | 82 | October 14th 06 12:11 AM |
Insurance for Cirrus SR20 and SR22 | Doodybutch | Owning | 15 | April 1st 05 01:47 AM |
Cirrus SR20 Fatal Crash in SC | Richard Kaplan | Piloting | 24 | April 22nd 04 10:47 AM |