![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If I buy a used homebuilt, is it possible for me to make big
modifications, such as installing a larger engine, adding long range fuel tanks, floats, etc., assuming there was an A/P to sign-off on it? Any FAA approvals required? Is it likely an A/P would be willing to make major changes like this or is the liability too great? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A&P concerns about liability really depend on the individual.
And if **you're** the A&P ... |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
ups.com... If I buy a used homebuilt, is it possible for me to make big modifications, such as installing a larger engine, adding long range fuel tanks, floats, etc., assuming there was an A/P to sign-off on it? Any FAA approvals required? Is it likely an A/P would be willing to make major changes like this or is the liability too great? This issue comes around from time to time, and I am sorry to admit that I don't recall the citations. However, IIFR, there is a considerable risk in this, iven when you are a certificated mechanic. Basically, the amateur build experimental (in the US) does not have a type certificate, but does have an approved set of operating limitations which have a similar function. The beginning of a possible problem is that a significant change, which could even be change in the propeller pitch, could trigger an additional test period--and a larger or smaller engine almost certainly would do so. The problem that could start is that, once the test period is reopened, you may or may not be permitted to return to the earlier configuration in the event that the modification proves less than satisfactory. Again, as the story was related to me, all of the above are possible problems even when you are an A&P and/or the original builder. Some people also sell/purchase used amateur built aircraft as "parts" because of the liability issues. That could also have the beneficial effect of causing you to accomplish a much more thorough inspection of your "new" aircraft before taking flight. Presuming that you make sufficient repairs, modifications, and/or new construction; that could reasonably make you the new "original" builder of the aircraft as most recently constructed. Again, I don't recall the citations and cannot swear to their accuracy. I would suggest that you start by talking to your local EAA tech counselor/inspector, and then possibly the EAA home office. Ultimately, if you procede with a project of this magnetude, you will end up talking to someone in an FAA engineering office your local FSDO will have a phone number and department name if you can't find it anywhere else. Peter |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Looking for a Shop to work Modify A magneto | Dick Kurtz | Home Built | 0 | August 25th 05 04:59 AM |
How to License Your Homebuilt Aircraft | [email protected] | Home Built | 0 | January 26th 05 04:11 PM |
FS2002 modify cfg files, or.... | rottenberg | Simulators | 1 | June 29th 04 12:25 PM |
I'm STILL trying to ID a homebuilt aircraft | Phillip Rhodes | Restoration | 1 | November 27th 03 06:59 AM |
I'm still trying to ID a homebuilt aircraft | Phillip Rhodes | Home Built | 1 | November 26th 03 08:43 PM |