![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4 Sep, 10:37, Andreas Maurer wrote:
Why not simply keep the left hand *very* close to the release handle as suggested by standard operating procedure? We used to have a system in the UK which ensured this: the pilot waved one finger for "take up slack" and two for "all out". Thus the launch didn't start until the signaller was assured that the pilot had a hand free. Now the launch starts when the signaller feels like it, and s/he just has to hope that the pilot has a hand near the release, and not scratching himself, adjusting the altimeter, twiddling with the GPS - or actually on the release, ready for an unwanted pull off when the wheel hits a bump. I'm sure it will change back in due course. Ian |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Ian,
Ian schrieb: We used to have a system in the UK which ensured this: the pilot waved one finger for "take up slack" and two for "all out". Thus the launch didn't start until the signaller was assured that the pilot had a hand free. Now the launch starts when the signaller feels like it, and s/he just has to hope that the pilot has a hand near the release, and not scratching himself, adjusting the altimeter, twiddling with the GPS - or actually on the release, ready for an unwanted pull off when the wheel hits a bump. I am sure that i would NOT want to signal a final "go" in a Discus or Mini-Nimbus. The release handle is down at the bottom of the stick. With long trousers you can have trouble grabbing it fast. I made it a habit to put two fingers over it before launching (both winch and aero-tow). That way i wont pull it inadvertendly (fingers are stretched out, not really gripping the handle) but i am still able to release fast without searching for the damn knob. CU and happy landings, Markus |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This is mostly an attempt to rename a thread which
now has NO connection whatsoever with 925's crash on Sunday. As I understand it, the British system was changed after accidents where pilots accepted a cable without being ready to go and were winched off as a result of, for example, scratching their noses. We can now drill into pupils that you don't accept a cable until you are ready to launch and your hand stays near the release until the end of the launch, which will proceed without any further pilot to launch marshal communication being required. It's a system which works well. If the pilot, for any reason, wants to abort the launch they can pull the release and shout 'stop'. The worst that can happen in that case is the launch marshal fails to notice and the cable has to be pulled back out. At 14:42 04 September 2007, Markus Gayda wrote: Hi Ian, Ian schrieb: We used to have a system in the UK which ensured this: the pilot waved one finger for 'take up slack' and two for 'all out'. Thus the launch didn't start until the signaller was assured that the pilot had a hand free. Now the launch starts when the signaller feels like it, and s/he just has to hope that the pilot has a hand near the release, and not scratching himself, adjusting the altimeter, twiddling with the GPS - or actually on the release, ready for an unwanted pull off when the wheel hits a bump. I am sure that i would NOT want to signal a final 'go' in a Discus or Mini-Nimbus. The release handle is down at the bottom of the stick. With long trousers you can have trouble grabbing it fast. I made it a habit to put two fingers over it before launching (both winch and aero-tow). That way i wont pull it inadvertendly (fingers are stretched out, not really gripping the handle) but i am still able to release fast without searching for the damn knob. CU and happy landings, Markus |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The system of winch launch signalling, in the UK, was
changed so that pilots had their fingers close to the release on take-off; not sticking two fingers up in the air. You are not meant to accept the cable until you are ready to launch, all fiddling complete; you accept the cable you are ready to go. At 14:00 04 September 2007, Ian wrote: We used to have a system in the UK which ensured this: the pilot waved one finger for 'take up slack' and two for 'all out'. Thus the launch didn't start until the signaller was assured that the pilot had a hand free. Now the launch starts when the signaller feels like it, and s/he just has to hope that the pilot has a hand near the release, and not scratching himself, adjusting the altimeter, twiddling with the GPS - or actually on the release, ready for an unwanted pull off when the wheel hits a bump. I'm sure it will change back in due course. Ian |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4 Sep, 15:59, Andrew Warbrick
wrote: This is mostly an attempt to rename a thread which now has NO connection whatsoever with 925's crash on Sunday. As I understand it, the British system was changed after accidents where pilots accepted a cable without being ready to go and were winched off as a result of, for example, scratching their noses. That was the claim. In reality, I think it was changed because Lasham had a new CFI who wanted to make an impact on the gliding scene. I'm all in favour of changing systems from time to time. When people have to think about what they are doing they are less likely to make accidents from unwarranted assumptions. I still don't like losing that degree of control of the launch, though. Ian |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4 Sep, 16:02, Mark Dickson
wrote: The system of winch launch signalling, in the UK, was changed so that pilots had their fingers close to the release on take-off; not sticking two fingers up in the air. You are not meant to accept the cable until you are ready to launch, all fiddling complete; you accept the cable you are ready to go. Not meant to, no. However, I think there is another side: the cable should not be offered to the glider unless the launch can proceed immediately. All too often the cable is attached, then there is a short delay, then the deay gets longer, then the pilot gets distracted, then ... The old system ensured that when the launch started, the pilot had a had free. It may not have been in the right place, but at least it was guaranteed not to be reprogramming a GPS ... Ian |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 4, 2:56 pm, Ian wrote:
On 4 Sep, 10:37, Andreas Maurer wrote: Why not simply keep the left hand *very* close to the release handle as suggested by standard operating procedure? We used to have a system in the UK which ensured this: the pilot waved one finger for "take up slack" and two for "all out". Thus the launch didn't start until the signaller was assured that the pilot had a hand free. Now the launch starts when the signaller feels like it, and s/he just has to hope that the pilot has a hand near the release, and not scratching himself, adjusting the altimeter, twiddling with the GPS - or actually on the release, ready for an unwanted pull off when the wheel hits a bump. We now have a system in which the pilot decides when to hand control over to the launch point, by asking for the cable to be attached. He/ she shouldn't do that until the are absolutely ready to launch. When launching I don't have a free hand, as one is on the stick and the other is holding or touching the yellow knob. I wouldn't want to take my hand off that yellow knob (especially in the Discus) as if I need it in a hurry I can be sure I'll have trouble finding it. The one time I've had to pull off I was glad all I had to do was do it, rather than struggle to find the knob in a new type of glider. So, personally, I hope we stick with the current system. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I learnt to glide after the new system was introduced. I have two hands and at the start of a winch launch I want one hand on the = release and the other on the joystick, so I have no free hand for signallin= g (at the all out stage) =20 I am happy either for someone external to signal, or as at happened when I = winched recently in France, to use the radio. I can also understand the use= of a wings level signal (for up slack), but this does not work when you ha= ve a glider full of water, which needs level wings prior to the start. Rory Newsgroup: rec.aviation.soaringSubject: Winch launch procedure and acci= dentsAuthor: Ian Date/Time: 15:20 04 September 2= 007 As I understand it, the British system was changed after accidents wher= e pilots accepted a cable without being ready to go and were winched off a= s a result of, for example, scratching their noses. __________________________________________________ _______________ The next generation of MSN Hotmail has arrived - Windows Live Hotmail http://www.newhotmail.co.uk= |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4 Sep, 17:31, Rory O'Conor
wrote: I learnt to glide after the new system was introduced. I have two hands and at the start of a winch launch I want one hand on the = release and the other on the joystick, "On" the release? Eeek. People have had nasty accidents that way! Ian |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Depends on your definition of 'on'. I have my fingers
'on' the release at the start of a winch lauch. By that I mean that I rest two straight fingers on the top of the release knob, either side of the cable. What I don't do is curl my fingers round it unless I need to pull it. At 19:01 04 September 2007, Ian wrote: On 4 Sep, 17:31, Rory O'Conor wrote: I learnt to glide after the new system was introduced. I have two hands and at the start of a winch launch I want one hand on the = release and the other on the joystick, 'On' the release? Eeek. People have had nasty accidents that way! Ian |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Another fatal accident | Mike the Strike | Soaring | 0 | September 20th 06 11:50 PM |
Fatal accident in Italy | 2cernauta2 | Soaring | 1 | April 4th 06 05:50 PM |
Fatal accident near Wenatchee, WA | [email protected] | Soaring | 2 | June 27th 05 01:54 AM |
Pilot's 2nd Fatal Accident | Aardvark | Piloting | 44 | May 21st 04 02:34 PM |
Hawaii Fatal Accident | Rocky | Rotorcraft | 0 | July 25th 03 03:01 PM |