![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The foolish buyer trick I've seen more often than others is the "It comes
with a fresh annual, I don't need a pre-purchase inspection." approach to airplane buying. Aargh. We had an estate auction in this area recently where 4 vintage aircraft were sold. Unfortunately (for the buyers), the rules of the auction prevented anything more than a logbook review and a cursory look at the aircraft. All 4 aircraft sold during the auction at reasonable prices considering these aircraft had sat for a couple of years and the logbooks *probably* were not in the best of shape. Although each of the aircraft came with a fresh annual. ;-) It is 3 weeks later and three of the four aircraft have not left the nest. The fourth aircraft did go home with the new owner after a blown crankshaft seal was replaced. I can't understand how the annual didn't turn up a blown crankshaft seal. One of the aircraft still on the field had 50+ squawks when the new owner gave it the once-over. Now, this was an ongoing restoration project and a few squawks should have been expected but over 50? With a new annual? Not acceptable. Another of the aircraft still on the field wouldn't pass a run-up. Why? It had been filled with autofuel some time back, not flown or run for a while, and the fuel system was badly gummed up. Oh, by the way, there is no autofuel STC for this airplane. Again, this airplane had a fresh annual. The other airplane still on the field hasn't had maintenance related problems, so I guess the owner is probably happy with that. He's probably not happy that he ground looped it on his first landing. It is undergoing some minor repairs at this time. Another foolish buyer trick is buying a fixer-upper. Generally, an airplane's value is LESS than the sum of its parts. Take a $30k C-172 or Cherokee, add new paint @ $8k, a new interior @ $5k, a new panel @ $15k, an engine overhaul @ $15k and you still have an airplane worth $50k or less despite the $70k+ you've invested. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The foolish buyer trick I've seen more often than others is the "It comes
with a fresh annual, I don't need a pre-purchase inspection." approach to airplane buying. Anyone who accepts this is crazy. Another of the aircraft still on the field wouldn't pass a run-up. Why? It had been filled with autofuel some time back, not flown or run for a while, and the fuel system was badly gummed up. Oh, by the way, there is no autofuel STC for this airplane. Again, this airplane had a fresh annual. How long was "a while"? Unleaded mogas won't "gum up" anything for years -- unless, of course, the mogas had ethanol in it. Then it will supposedly start attacking rubber seals. How does an A&P sign off an annual inspection on a plane that won't pass a run-up test? -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
We had an estate auction in this area recently where 4 vintage aircraft
were sold. Unfortunately (for the buyers), the rules of the auction prevented anything more than a logbook review and a cursory look at the aircraft. Was someone holding them hostage and forcing them to bid on aircraft? They did not have to bid on them.. High Risk?? Bid Low.. BT |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'd think the local FSDO people would be interested in whoever signed
them off as airworthy. If nothing else, that's what the FSDO should be for. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
agreed...
"nrp" wrote in message ups.com... I'd think the local FSDO people would be interested in whoever signed them off as airworthy. If nothing else, that's what the FSDO should be for. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
So does that mean the new owners
can hold the log book signers liable and responsible for any and all missed problems? Lou |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jay Honeck" wrote in message ups.com... The foolish buyer trick I've seen more often than others is the "It comes with a fresh annual, I don't need a pre-purchase inspection." approach to airplane buying. Anyone who accepts this is crazy. Another of the aircraft still on the field wouldn't pass a run-up. Why? It had been filled with autofuel some time back, not flown or run for a while, and the fuel system was badly gummed up. Oh, by the way, there is no autofuel STC for this airplane. Again, this airplane had a fresh annual. How long was "a while"? Unleaded mogas won't "gum up" anything for years -- unless, of course, the mogas had ethanol in it. Then it will supposedly start attacking rubber seals. Auto gas (and maybe avgas too) leaves behind a laquer like residue if it is allowed to evaporate. That's one of the reasons people encourage draining gas tanks when vehicles are stored for a long time. How does an A&P sign off an annual inspection on a plane that won't pass a run-up test? Same question for the airplane with a blown crankshaft seal. A suspicious person might be inclined to believe the AI never turned a wrench on the aircraft. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 13, 12:31 am, nrp wrote:
I'd think the local FSDO people would be interested in whoever signed them off as airworthy. If nothing else, that's what the FSDO should be for. The FSDO/FAA generally refuses to get involved in business disputes between mechanics and disgruntled airplane purchasers... Though the facts in this case are rather interesting... denny btw, for us old farts, that is known as a "P51 Annual"... |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 09/12/07 19:53, Jay Honeck wrote:
The foolish buyer trick I've seen more often than others is the "It comes with a fresh annual, I don't need a pre-purchase inspection." approach to airplane buying. Anyone who accepts this is crazy. Another of the aircraft still on the field wouldn't pass a run-up. Why? It had been filled with autofuel some time back, not flown or run for a while, and the fuel system was badly gummed up. Oh, by the way, there is no autofuel STC for this airplane. Again, this airplane had a fresh annual. How long was "a while"? Unleaded mogas won't "gum up" anything for years -- unless, of course, the mogas had ethanol in it. Then it will supposedly start attacking rubber seals. How does an A&P sign off an annual inspection on a plane that won't pass a run-up test? Do you know the airplane couldn't pass the run-up at the time of the annual inspection? All we know is that it didn't pass the run-up *now*. -- Mark Hansen, PP-ASEL, Instrument Airplane, USUA Ultralight Pilot Cal Aggie Flying Farmers Sacramento, CA |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
btw, for us old farts, that is known as a "P51 Annual"...
'Splain, please? -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Airport buyer may have been murdered. | George Patterson | Piloting | 16 | June 23rd 05 01:57 AM |
Containerize plane to international buyer | tbm700 | Owning | 9 | February 22nd 05 05:50 PM |
Containerize plane to international buyer | tbm700 | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | February 19th 05 05:07 PM |
First Time Buyer. Help! | KayInPA | Owning | 82 | April 15th 04 04:31 AM |
NEW BUYER PLEASE HELP | Tony | Owning | 9 | July 24th 03 03:07 PM |