![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Maxwell" wrote in
: "James Sleeman" wrote in message oups.com... On Oct 27, 6:33 pm, Bertie the Bunyip wrote: don't make a dent in the nation's air traffic. Nobody is landing 737s on grass strips. Yes, they are. I've done it. Do tell. It'd have to be a pretty hard packed grass strip I'd have thought? Many years ago, the AP ran a story on a 737 dead stick landing in the south. Perhaps Mississippi, Louisiana? It think the pilot put it down on a levee or something if I recall. The photo showed the main gear buried to the top of the tires, without folding the gear. That pilot was both very lucky, and very good. It think all souls walked away. I still can't imagine it. We do it in the sim farily frequently, though at the time that happened deadstick landings weren't usually on the list of things to do. If the ground is anyway soft, they will sink, and badly. Quite a few pilots have made a corner too sloppily and put a gear leg off the taxiway and got stuck. not surprising with tire pressures as high as 270 psi (the 737's is considerbly, less, though I can't remember the number) Hard packed earth will support one though. Bertie |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
Intersting site, but the screens inside the wheel well were on all -200s of the period. They aren't for gravel protection, they are to protect the hydraulics in the event of a tire burst. If they are badly disturbed, there's a warning in the office to say so. Later ones didn't, but on those, most of the hydraulics and the aileron actuator were forward of the wheel well bulkhead. the gravel deflector on the nosewheel is huge compred to the one we had. Our's retracted inside the wheel well, unless i'm remember ing it wrong. I have a pic of the airplanes somewhere. It doesn't show the vortx killers under the nacelles. They looked like long pitot tubes that stuck out a couple of feet in front of the intakes and used bleed air in some mystical way to keep dust from coming into the engines. They may have workedm but you could shave with a fan blade after six months of operaton in fine dust and sand. Alaska Airlines used to operate some combis fitted out with all that gear. I've been a passenger on them in the past in some of their smaller stations. Here's a photo of one showing the vortex killers as well as the nosewheel deflector: http://www.jetphotos.net/viewphoto.php?id=459024 |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rich Ahrens wrote in
. net: Bertie the Bunyip wrote: Intersting site, but the screens inside the wheel well were on all -200s of the period. They aren't for gravel protection, they are to protect the hydraulics in the event of a tire burst. If they are badly disturbed, there's a warning in the office to say so. Later ones didn't, but on those, most of the hydraulics and the aileron actuator were forward of the wheel well bulkhead. the gravel deflector on the nosewheel is huge compred to the one we had. Our's retracted inside the wheel well, unless i'm remember ing it wrong. I have a pic of the airplanes somewhere. It doesn't show the vortx killers under the nacelles. They looked like long pitot tubes that stuck out a couple of feet in front of the intakes and used bleed air in some mystical way to keep dust from coming into the engines. They may have workedm but you could shave with a fan blade after six months of operaton in fine dust and sand. Alaska Airlines used to operate some combis fitted out with all that gear. I've been a passenger on them in the past in some of their smaller stations. Here's a photo of one showing the vortex killers as well as the nosewheel deflector: http://www.jetphotos.net/viewphoto.php?id=459024 Yeah, that one also has the large nosewhel gravel deflector. I'm almost positive our's didn't, but I could be mistaken. Been years since I've seen them. Al the same, our gear extension speed was quite low, 210 knots, IIRC as opposed to 250 or 270 normally. One of our guys, who was fond of putting it out at a reltively high altitude for a steeper initial approach, took to using th emergency extension onthe mains only until he was on final. This one doesn't seem to have the elephant ears posted previously. the kits must have been ala carte.. Bertie |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
James Sleeman writes:
Do tell. It'd have to be a pretty hard packed grass strip I'd have thought? There's a kit for unpaved strips, but I rather doubt that most grassy surfaces would be hard enough to resist the weight of the aircraft. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote in
: James Sleeman writes: Do tell. It'd have to be a pretty hard packed grass strip I'd have thought? There's a kit for unpaved strips, but I rather doubt that most grassy surfaces would be hard enough to resist the weight of the aircraft. We'll you'll never find out, because you'll nev er fly. Ever I, OTOH, have done it. Bertie |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 28, 8:10 am, Richard Riley wrote:
Now that's not fair, Bertie. I'm sure he's flown. Bought a ticket and everything. ROTFL |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Riley wrote in
: On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 19:02:25 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the Bunyip wrote: Mxsmanic wrote in m: James Sleeman writes: Do tell. It'd have to be a pretty hard packed grass strip I'd have thought? There's a kit for unpaved strips, but I rather doubt that most grassy surfaces would be hard enough to resist the weight of the aircraft. We'll you'll never find out, because you'll nev er fly. Ever I, OTOH, have done it. Now that's not fair, Bertie. I'm sure he's flown. Bought a ticket and everything. Wouldn't he have to leave his bedroom for that? Bertie |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Riley wrote in
: On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 19:51:44 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the Bunyip wrote: Wouldn't he have to leave his bedroom for that? Yeah, but didn't he move from the US to France? I doubt he went over on a tramp steamer. True. I forgot about that.He has more nerve than I gave him credit for. Maybe they put a computer and some Backstreet Boys posters inside a container and shipped him. Bertie |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Riley wrote in
: On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 20:57:19 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the Bunyip wrote: Richard Riley wrote in m: On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 19:51:44 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the Bunyip wrote: Wouldn't he have to leave his bedroom for that? Yeah, but didn't he move from the US to France? I doubt he went over on a tramp steamer. True. I forgot about that.He has more nerve than I gave him credit for. Maybe they put a computer and some Backstreet Boys posters inside a container and shipped him. That's possible. I was figuring a thorazine at the boarding gate. For th eflight attendants and the poor ******* next to him, of course. Bertie |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 28, 10:17 am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
For th eflight attendants and the poor ******* next to him, of course. The eflight attendants huh... I believe I believe |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Special North 40 party feature | Montblack | Home Built | 9 | October 6th 05 04:07 PM |
Best new feature at OSH | Jim Smith | Piloting | 6 | August 10th 05 04:22 PM |
GPS Nearest Airport feature | Chris W | Piloting | 25 | March 7th 05 12:41 AM |
Undock Window Feature doesn't work | Dave Schwartz | Simulators | 2 | January 18th 04 08:51 PM |
TV-feature - "Rodeo in the Sky" | Rene Heise | Soaring | 0 | October 2nd 03 11:28 AM |