![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Let's hope others in power oppose Bush's TFRs: http://correntewire.com/bush_to_ca_burn_baybee_burn CA Did Not Cave To Standard Bush Security Demands Thanks in large measure to LtGov (Democrat) John Garamendi’s pounding on the issue, agreement was reached with Secret Service etc to let Bush have his meaningless photo op so long as all the firefighting effort continued uninterrupted. From FAA flight restriction notification: [Warning! Site triggered a “Certification Error” caution flag but I opened it and am still OK, your consequence may vary.] “7/1542 - PART 2 OF 6 CA.. FLIGHT RESTRICTIONS, SAN DIEGO….” “A. ALL AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS WITHIN A 10 NMR AREA LISTED ABOVE ARE PROHIBITED EXCEPT FOR: 1. ALL EMERGENCY/LIFE SAVING FLIGHT (MEDICAL/LAW ENFORCEMENT/FIREFIGHTING) OPERATIONS DIRECTLY SUPPORTING THE CURRENT FIRE EMERGENCY, APPROVED LAW ENFORCEMENT, MILITARY AIRCRAFT DIRECTLY SUPPORTING THE UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE (USSS) AND THE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, APPROVED EMERGENCY MEDICAL FLIGHTS,” All approved flights are required to maintain continuous voice contact or squawking their beacon but that would be a requirement in such a crowded environment anyway. Bush gets his moment but without any negative impact, what a nice change of pace! ------------------ http://tfr.faa.gov/save_pages/detail_7_1542.html NOTAM Number : FDC 7/1542 Issue Date : October 24, 2007 at 1929 UTC Location : San Diego, California Beginning Date and Time : October 25, 2007 at 1605 UTC Ending Date and Time : October 25, 2007 at 2050 UTC Reason for NOTAM : Temporary flight restrictions for VIP (Very Important Person) Movement Affected Area(s) Top Area A Airspace Definition: Center: 13.2 nautical miles from MISSION BAY VORTAC(MZB) on the 029 radial (Latitude: 32ş56'32"N, Longitude: 117ş02'40"W) Radius: 30 nautical miles Altitude: From the surface up to but not including FL(180) Effective Date(s): From October 25, 2007 at 1605 UTC (October 25, 2007 at 0905 PDT) To October 25, 2007 at 2050 UTC (October 25, 2007 at 1350 PDT) Area B Airspace Definition: Center: 8.3 nautical miles from MISSION BAY VORTAC(MZB) on the 034 radial (Latitude: 32ş52'24"N, Longitude: 117ş06'06"W) Radius: 10 nautical miles Altitude: From the surface up to but not including FL(180) Effective Date(s): From October 25, 2007 at 1605 UTC (October 25, 2007 at 0905 PDT) To October 25, 2007 at 1715 UTC (October 25, 2007 at 1015 PDT) Area C Airspace Definition: Center: 19.3 nautical miles from MISSION BAY VORTAC(MZB) on the 010 radial (Latitude: 33ş04'30"N, Longitude: 117ş03'56"W) Radius: 10 nautical miles Altitude: From the surface up to but not including FL(180) Effective Date(s): From October 25, 2007 at 1645 UTC (October 25, 2007 at 0945 PDT) To October 25, 2007 at 2030 UTC (October 25, 2007 at 1330 PDT) Area D Airspace Definition: Center: 8.3 nautical miles from MISSION BAY VORTAC(MZB) on the 034 radial (Latitude: 32ş52'24"N, Longitude: 117ş06'06"W) Radius: 10 nautical miles Altitude: From the surface up to but not including FL(180) Effective Date(s): From October 25, 2007 at 1945 UTC (October 25, 2007 at 1245 PDT) To October 25, 2007 at 2050 UTC (October 25, 2007 at 1350 PDT) Operating Restrictions and Requirements No pilots may operate an aircraft in the areas covered by this NOTAM (except as described). EXCEPT AS SPECIFIED BELOW EXCLUDING MEXICAN AIRSPACE AND/OR UNLESS AUTHORIZED BY THE AIR TRAFFIC SECURITY COORDINATOR VIA THE DOMESTIC EVENTS NETWORK (DEN): A. All aircraft operations within a 10 NMR area listed above are prohibited except for: ALL EMERGENCY/LIFE SAVING FLIGHT (MEDICAL/LAW ENFORCEMENT/FIREFIGHTING) OPERATIONS DIRECTLY SUPPORTING THE CURRENT FIRE EMERGENCY, APPROVED LAW ENFORCEMENT, MILITARY AIRCRAFT DIRECTLY SUPPORTING THE UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE (USSS) AND THE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, APPROVED EMERGENCY MEDICAL FLIGHTS, AND REGULARLY SCHEDULED COMMERCIAL PASSENGER AND ALL-CARGO CARRIERS OPERATING UNDER ONE OF THE FOLLOWING TSA-APPROVED STANDARD SECURITY PROGRAMS/PROCEDURES: AIRCRAFT OPERATOR STANDARD SECURITY PROGRAM (AOSSP), DOMESTIC SECURITY INTEGRATION PROGRAM (DSIP), TWELVE FIVE STANDARD SECURITY PROGRAM (TFSSP) ALL CARGO, OR ALL-CARGO INTERNATIONAL SECURITY PROCEDURE (ACISP) AND ARE ARRIVING INTO AND/OR DEPARTING FROM 14 CFR PART 139 AIRPORTS. FOR OPERATIONS WITHIN THE TFR, ALL EMERGENCY/LIFE SAVING FLIGHT (MEDICAL/LAW ENFORCEMENT/FIREFIGHTING) OPERATIONS NOT SPECIFICALLY IN SUPPORT OF THE CURRENT FIRE EMERGENCY MUST COORDINATE IN ADVANCE WITH THE USSS AT 858-537-5900 TO AVOID POTENTIAL DELAYS. B. Within the airspace between 10 NMR and 30 NMR listed above: All aircraft entering or exiting the 30 NM radius TFR must be on an active IFR or VFR flight plan with a discrete code assigned by an Air Traffic Control (ATC) facility. Aircraft must be squawking the discrete code prior to departure and at all times while in the TFR. All aircraft entering or exiting the 30 NM radius TFR must remain in two-way radio communications with ATC. All aircraft operating within the 10 to 30 NM radius TFR and operating at altitudes of up to but not including FL180 are limited to aircraft arriving or departing local airfields and ATC may authorize transit operations. Aircraft may not loiter. FLIGHT TRAINING, PRACTICE INSTRUMENT APPROACHES, AEROBATIC FLIGHT, GLIDER OPERATIONS, PARACHUTE OPERATIONS, ULTRALIGHT, HANG GLIDING, BALLOON OPERATIONS, AGRICULTURE/CROP DUSTING, ANIMAL POPULATION CONTROL FLIGHT OPERATIONS, BANNER TOWING OPERATIONS, MODEL AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS, MODEL ROCKETRY, AND UNMANNED AERIAL SYSTEMS (UAS) ARE NOT AUTHORIZED. All USSS cleared aircraft operators based in the area should notify the USSS prior to their departure. FOR OPERATIONS WITHIN THE 10 TO 30 NM RADIUS TFR, ALL EMERGENCY/LIFE SAVING FLIGHT (MEDICAL/LAW ENFORCEMENT/FIREFIGHTING/DOD) OPERATIONS IN SUPPORT OF THE CURRENT FIRE EMERGENCY WITHIN THE TFR ARE EXEMPT FROM THE ABOVE RESTRICTIONS. THESE OPERATIONS NOT DIRECTLY SUPPORTING THE CURRENT FIRE EMERGENCY MUST COORDINATE FLIGHTS IN ADVANCE WITH THE USSS AT 858-537-5900 TO AVOID POTENTIAL DELAYS. C. WITHIN THE ENTIRE TFR AREA ALL EMERGENCY/LIFE SAVING FLIGHT (MEDICAL/LAW ENFORCEMENT/FIREFIGHTING/DOD) OPERATIONS IN SUPPORT OF THE CURRENT FIRE EMERGENCY MUST BE EITHER REMAIN IN TWO-WAY RADIO COMMUNICATIONS WITH ATC OR BE SQUAWKING AN ASSIGNED BEACON CODE. D. FAA RECOMMENDS THAT ALL AIRCRAFT OPERATORS CHECK NOTAMS FREQUENTLY FOR POSSIBLE CHANGES TO THIS TFR PRIOR TO OPERATIONS WITHIN THIS REGION. Other Information: Top ARTCC: ZLA - Los Angeles Center Authority: Title 14 CFR section 91.141 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Larry Dighera writes:
Let's hope others in power oppose Bush's TFRs: Perhaps that is over-optimistic. Thanks in large measure to LtGov (Democrat) John Garamendi’s pounding on the issue, agreement was reached with Secret Service etc to let Bush have his meaningless photo op so long as all the firefighting effort continued uninterrupted. From FAA flight restriction notification: [Warning! Site triggered a “Certification Error” caution flag but I opened it and am still OK, your consequence may vary.] “7/1542 - PART 2 OF 6 CA.. FLIGHT RESTRICTIONS, SAN DIEGO….” “A. ALL AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS WITHIN A 10 NMR AREA LISTED ABOVE ARE PROHIBITED EXCEPT FOR: 1. ALL EMERGENCY/LIFE SAVING FLIGHT (MEDICAL/LAW ENFORCEMENT/FIREFIGHTING) OPERATIONS DIRECTLY SUPPORTING THE CURRENT FIRE EMERGENCY, APPROVED LAW ENFORCEMENT, MILITARY AIRCRAFT DIRECTLY SUPPORTING THE UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE (USSS) AND THE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, APPROVED EMERGENCY MEDICAL FLIGHTS,” All approved flights are required to maintain continuous voice contact or squawking their beacon but that would be a requirement in such a crowded environment anyway. Bush gets his moment but without any negative impact, what a nice change of pace! Good news, for a change. Someone refused to salute the hat on the pole. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote in
: Larry Dighera writes: Let's hope others in power oppose Bush's TFRs: Perhaps that is over-optimistic. What, like your view that you have a life? Bertie |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2007-10-27 11:14:01 -0700, Larry Dighera said:
Let's hope others in power oppose Bush's TFRs: http://correntewire.com/bush_to_ca_burn_baybee_burn CA Did Not Cave To Standard Bush Security Demands Thanks in large measure to LtGov (Democrat) John Garamendi’s pounding on the issue, agreement was reached with Secret Service etc to let Bush have his meaningless photo op so long as all the firefighting effort continued uninterrupted. From FAA flight restriction notification: [Warning! Site triggered a “Certification Error” caution flag but I opened it and am still OK, your consequence may vary.] “7/1542 - PART 2 OF 6 CA.. FLIGHT RESTRICTIONS, SAN DIEGO….” “A. ALL AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS WITHIN A 10 NMR AREA LISTED ABOVE ARE PROHIBITED EXCEPT FOR: 1. ALL EMERGENCY/LIFE SAVING FLIGHT (MEDICAL/LAW ENFORCEMENT/FIREFIGHTING) OPERATIONS DIRECTLY SUPPORTING THE CURRENT FIRE EMERGENCY, APPROVED LAW ENFORCEMENT, MILITARY AIRCRAFT DIRECTLY SUPPORTING THE UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE (USSS) AND THE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, APPROVED EMERGENCY MEDICAL FLIGHTS,” All approved flights are required to maintain continuous voice contact or squawking their beacon but that would be a requirement in such a crowded environment anyway. Bush gets his moment but without any negative impact, what a nice change of pace! All Presidential TFRs have standard language like that allowing law enforcement, emergency, and firefighting aircraft into the TFR. California had nothing to do with it. Garamendis is taking credit for doing nothing. -- Waddling Eagle World Famous Flight Instructor |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
C J Campbell wrote:
On 2007-10-27 11:14:01 -0700, Larry Dighera said: Let's hope others in power oppose Bush's TFRs: http://correntewire.com/bush_to_ca_burn_baybee_burn CA Did Not Cave To Standard Bush Security Demands Thanks in large measure to LtGov (Democrat) John Garamendi’s pounding on the issue, agreement was reached with Secret Service etc to let Bush have his meaningless photo op so long as all the firefighting effort continued uninterrupted. From FAA flight restriction notification: [Warning! Site triggered a “Certification Error” caution flag but I opened it and am still OK, your consequence may vary.] “7/1542 - PART 2 OF 6 CA.. FLIGHT RESTRICTIONS, SAN DIEGO….” “A. ALL AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS WITHIN A 10 NMR AREA LISTED ABOVE ARE PROHIBITED EXCEPT FOR: 1. ALL EMERGENCY/LIFE SAVING FLIGHT (MEDICAL/LAW ENFORCEMENT/FIREFIGHTING) OPERATIONS DIRECTLY SUPPORTING THE CURRENT FIRE EMERGENCY, APPROVED LAW ENFORCEMENT, MILITARY AIRCRAFT DIRECTLY SUPPORTING THE UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE (USSS) AND THE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, APPROVED EMERGENCY MEDICAL FLIGHTS,” All approved flights are required to maintain continuous voice contact or squawking their beacon but that would be a requirement in such a crowded environment anyway. Bush gets his moment but without any negative impact, what a nice change of pace! All Presidential TFRs have standard language like that allowing law enforcement, emergency, and firefighting aircraft into the TFR. California had nothing to do with it. Garamendis is taking credit for doing nothing. Then why was all the aerial rescue work stopped within the TFR when he ingratiated himself to New Orleans, or was the wording something that changed after all the criticism? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 27, 1:14 pm, Larry Dighera wrote:
Let's hope others in power oppose Bush's TFRs: http://correntewire.com/bush_to_ca_burn_baybee_burn CA Did Not Cave To Standard Bush Security Demands Thanks in large measure to LtGov (Democrat) John Garamendi's pounding on the issue, agreement was reached with Secret Service etc to let Bush have his meaningless photo op so long as all the firefighting effort continued uninterrupted. However, dozens of firefighters were pulled off the lines to stand behind Drunkya for his photo-op, many choose not to smile for the cameras and were turned away chatting. The phoney FEMA "news" conference was classic Cheney staging, laughable...JG |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Larry Dighera wrote:
Let's hope others in power oppose Bush's TFRs: I was in McCall, ID in the summer of 2000, when the airport and surrounding airspace was shut down for several hours while Clinton did a forest fire photo op. The tanker pilots had a few choice comments on the radio (for AF1 and Marine1) , while they circled outside the area. It's not just a Bush thing. The problem is an executive branch that puts their priorities above those that they are supposedly concerned about. No one in McCall was fooled that summer. John Galban=====N4BQ (PA28-180) -- Message posted via http://www.aviationkb.com |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 16:18:18 GMT, "flynrider via AviationKB.com"
u32749@uwe wrote in 7a6c183288532@uwe: It's not just a Bush thing. The problem is an executive branch that puts their priorities above those that they are supposedly concerned about. These VIP TFRs are typical of the ineffectiveness of the DHS. If the appearance of Clinton or Bush at the scene of the fires were able to actually effect some benefit in fighting the fires, these self-promoting photo-ops might be excusable. It makes one wonder what it would take for the FAA to exclude VIPs from the Fire TFRs as well as pilots. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Larry Dighera wrote:
On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 16:18:18 GMT, "flynrider via AviationKB.com" u32749@uwe wrote in 7a6c183288532@uwe: It's not just a Bush thing. The problem is an executive branch that puts their priorities above those that they are supposedly concerned about. These VIP TFRs are typical of the ineffectiveness of the DHS. If the appearance of Clinton or Bush at the scene of the fires were able to actually effect some benefit in fighting the fires, these self-promoting photo-ops might be excusable. The problem is if the Prez just does a fly-by like he did right after New Orleans flooded he took crap for not being there. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 13:48:49 -0500, "Gig 601XL Builder"
wrDOTgiaconaATsuddenlink.net wrote in : The problem is if the Prez just does a fly-by like he did right after New Orleans flooded he took crap for not being there. The problem is, that the TSA/DHS doesn't understand how their VIP TFRs hamper emergency responders' efforts. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New demands for more GA security | C J Campbell | Piloting | 56 | March 3rd 06 12:37 AM |
TSA Demands More Air Passenger Data | Martin Hotze | Piloting | 3 | September 29th 04 12:31 AM |