Excellent TV Piece on GA

BDS writes:

You couldn't be more wrong if you tried.

People who have the means don't generally fly airplanes like Learjets and
Barons for leisure because they are not particularly fun airplanes to fly if
what you're after is the sheer joy of flying.

Sure, they're all fun to fly initially when you're learning a new aircraft,
and larger, faster, and more complex is always a bonus. But after the
honeymoon is over all the pilots I know would chose the smaller, simpler
aircraft to fly for fun every time.

Perhaps that is what you would choose, but someone is buying Barons. If what
you say were true, everyone would be flying ultralights, as they are the
smallest and simplest of all.

"Mxsmanic" wrote

Perhaps that is what you would choose, but someone is buying Barons. If
what
you say were true, everyone would be flying ultralights, as they are the
smallest and simplest of all.

Every time when I forget that you are dumber than a post, you say something
like this to remind me.

Are you really that stupid?

No need to answer. It was a rhetorical question.
--
Jim in NC

Mxsmanic wrote in
:

BDS writes:

You couldn't be more wrong if you tried.

People who have the means don't generally fly airplanes like Learjets
and Barons for leisure because they are not particularly fun
airplanes to fly if what you're after is the sheer joy of flying.

Sure, they're all fun to fly initially when you're learning a new
aircraft, and larger, faster, and more complex is always a bonus.
But after the honeymoon is over all the pilots I know would chose the
smaller, simpler aircraft to fly for fun every time.

Perhaps that is what you would choose, but someone is buying Barons.
If what you say were true, everyone would be flying ultralights, as
they are the smallest and simplest of all.


You're an idiot.


Bertie

"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
...
BDS writes:

You couldn't be more wrong if you tried.

People who have the means don't generally fly airplanes like Learjets
and
Barons for leisure because they are not particularly fun airplanes to
fly if
what you're after is the sheer joy of flying.

Sure, they're all fun to fly initially when you're learning a new
aircraft,
and larger, faster, and more complex is always a bonus. But after the
honeymoon is over all the pilots I know would chose the smaller, simpler
aircraft to fly for fun every time.

Perhaps that is what you would choose, but someone is buying Barons. If
what
you say were true, everyone would be flying ultralights, as they are the
smallest and simplest of all.

Do you understand the difference between flying to get somewhere and flying
for leisure?

BDS

"BDS" wrote in
:


"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
...
BDS writes:

You couldn't be more wrong if you tried.

People who have the means don't generally fly airplanes like
Learjets
and
Barons for leisure because they are not particularly fun airplanes
to
fly if
what you're after is the sheer joy of flying.

Sure, they're all fun to fly initially when you're learning a new
aircraft,
and larger, faster, and more complex is always a bonus. But after
the honeymoon is over all the pilots I know would chose the
smaller, simpler aircraft to fly for fun every time.

Perhaps that is what you would choose, but someone is buying Barons.
If
what
you say were true, everyone would be flying ultralights, as they are
the smallest and simplest of all.

Do you understand the difference between flying to get somewhere and
flying for leisure?


He doesn't even understand the difference between sitting in a chair at
a desk and flying for chrissake!


Bertie

"BDS" wrote in message
...
Do you understand the difference between flying to get somewhere and
flying
for leisure?

You're asking someone who doesn't know the difference between flying and
playing with a toy. The same person who won't drive because it's too boring,
but has no problems simulating a cross continental flight on autopilot.

I don't think MX understands much of anything.

"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
...
BDS writes:
But after the honeymoon is over

Perhaps that is what you would choose, but someone is buying Barons. If
what
you say were true, everyone would be flying ultralights, as they are the
smallest and simplest of all.

Looks like you ignored the sentence about the honeymoon being over.

Mxsmanic wrote in
:

Jay Honeck writes:

He's sarcastically referring to our moratorium on visiting Chicago
since King Daley ripped up Meigs Field. We haven't been back since
-- we won't go back till Daley is out of office.

Does he have an heir to inherit his office?




Waht's it to you, fjukktard?



Al you have to do is get an older copy of MSFS/



Bertie

BDS writes:

Do you understand the difference between flying to get somewhere and flying
for leisure?

Yes.

Does he have an heir to inherit his office?

Sadly, yes. This from Wikipedia:

"Daley is married to Margaret Daley, who was diagnosed with breast
cancer in 2002 and is still undergoing treatment. They have four
children: Nora, Patrick, Elizabeth and Kevin. Patrick Daley enlisted
in the 82nd Airborne after not being able to handle West Point and
attending other schools but strangely has not been deployed to Iraq
while the rest of Fort Bragg has."

So, I suppose we'll have a King Patrick Daley ruling Chicago in a few
years...

:-(

Oh, well. We've really learned to enjoy Kansas City, St Louis, and
Minneapolis.
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"