"socialist" when describing Hillary Clinton

Jay Honeck wrote:
As opposed to the discreet and unnoticeable gangs following Romney or
Huckabee, I'm sure. Way to keep on topic and follow the charter your
buddy Larry posted just recently, particularly:

"Chit-chat and hangar-flying articles unrelated to piloting should be
posted in rec.aviation.miscellaneous."

That's where Larry and I part ways. I think this is basically a hangar
flying session, where conversations among pilots range widely across the
board.

Oh, so you only want to enforce the parts of the charter that are
convenient to you. Not surprised.

That's where Larry and I part ways. I think this is basically a hangar
flying session, where conversations among pilots range widely across the
board.

Oh, so you only want to enforce the parts of the charter that are
convenient to you. Not surprised.

I never said anything about enforcing any "charter". I am, however, opposed
to personal attacks on other posters -- as your post so nicely illustrates.

Your obsession with this topic seems odd. I suggest flying as an elixir to
cheer your tortured soul... It works for me!
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"

"John Mazor" wrote

The first few primaries are all about money - convincing contributors to
put their money on you and not the other candidates. Only later is it
about winning enough delegates for the nominating convention.

Yes, but if a candidate does not do well in the early showings, he/she will
not get enough money, and usually have to drop out, all together.

That is what I object to, in the big picture. They are not around to get my
state's vote (and my vote) to be a possible choice.

I resent that. BIG time. I'll bet in the last 30 years, half of the early
primaries have eliminated my top choice in the presidential primary. Some
few states have been allowed to make choices for the country, that should be
made by the WHOLE country.

Simply, it sucks.
--
Jim in NC

"Jay Honeck" wrote

Two ideas:

1. Hold all state primaries on the same day, by law no more than six
months in advance of the presidential election. (This never-ending
electioneering must end...)

2. Make Election Day a national holiday, as is done in many democracies.
(Before you think I've gone soft, though, in order to do this Congress
must eliminate one other national holiday...)

I think #1 would go a long ways toward leveling the playing field, and #2
would help address our absurdly low election day turnout.

Possible ideas, not bad.

One improvement to 1.

There really needs to be two primaries, where the dozen or so candidates for
each party are trimmed down to perhaps 5 choices after the first primary, to
2 choices after the second primary, for each party. Again, all on the same
day, and not too far ahead of election day.

If that is not done, I see a few cohesive minority groups getting their
candidates on the ticket, and the moderate, majority voters, split their
votes among dozens of non descript candidates.

Perhaps not a very good correlation, but I see this type of thing happen all
the time in elections in high school for things like student council, and
prom/homecoming queens and court.
--
Jim in NC

On Jan 3, 2:27*pm, WolfRat wrote:
The Democrats in Iowa get to choose between an

OREO(Who denies he is half white)
FEMI-NAZI
AMBULANCE CHASER
HALF BREED

Oh Boy- Hide quoted text -

Well, that tells us all we need to know about you and your republican
ilk.

"Jay Honeck" wrote in
news:nqdfj.284140$Fc.251926@attbi_s21:

As opposed to the discreet and unnoticeable gangs following Romney or
Huckabee, I'm sure. Way to keep on topic and follow the charter your
buddy Larry posted just recently, particularly:

"Chit-chat and hangar-flying articles unrelated to piloting should be
posted in rec.aviation.miscellaneous."

That's where Larry and I part ways. I think this is basically a
hangar flying session, where conversations among pilots range widely
across the board. I have no problem with that,


So, you get to make up the rules, do you fukkkwit?





Bertie

"Jay Honeck" wrote in
news:Tfffj.284269$Fc.282352@attbi_s21:

That's where Larry and I part ways. I think this is basically a
hangar flying session, where conversations among pilots range widely
across the board.

Oh, so you only want to enforce the parts of the charter that are
convenient to you. Not surprised.

I never said anything about enforcing any "charter".

Oh, you just want everyone to abide by your rules.



Bertie

"Jay Honeck" wrote in
news:l4efj.19953$Ux2.17252@attbi_s22:

How do the 250,000 caucus goers earn the right to be national judges
of candidates ??

Stupid, ain't it? I have no idea why all states don't hold their
primaries on the same day.



You don't know much of anything, do you?


How's that killfiel working for you fjukkwit?



Bertie

One could say the same about you then since you see a kook's posting and
automatically decide what party he supports and what that party thinks
about.
"skym" wrote in message
...
On Jan 3, 2:27 pm, WolfRat wrote:
The Democrats in Iowa get to choose between an

OREO(Who denies he is half white)
FEMI-NAZI
AMBULANCE CHASER
HALF BREED

Oh Boy- Hide quoted text -

Well, that tells us all we need to know about you and your republican
ilk.

"news.verizon.net" wrote in newsSpfj.4468
$nN5.3569@trndny04:

One could say the same about you then since you see a kook's posting and
automatically decide what party he supports and what that party thinks
about.


Funny, jay does that too.


Bertie