![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I bought a box of old negatives at an estate sale and found several aircraft
images in the lot. Here are some samples. Is this a recon aircraft? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Don Pyeatt" wrote in message ... I bought a box of old negatives at an estate sale and found several aircraft images in the lot. Here are some samples. Is this a recon aircraft? E-50 Twin Bonanza ? Tony P. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Don Pyeatt" wrote in message ... I bought a box of old negatives at an estate sale and found several aircraft images in the lot. Here are some samples. Is this a recon aircraft? My best guess would be a Beech L.23 Seminole. -- Andrew B (Cheshire, England) "Heavier-than-air flying machines are impossible." (Lord Kelvin, president, Royal Society, 1895.) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Andrew B" wrote in message om... "Don Pyeatt" wrote in message ... I bought a box of old negatives at an estate sale and found several aircraft images in the lot. Here are some samples. Is this a recon aircraft? My best guess would be a Beech L.23 Seminole. -- Andrew B (Cheshire, England) "Heavier-than-air flying machines are impossible." (Lord Kelvin, president, Royal Society, 1895.) Yep, according to "Wiki" it's a L-23D, and specifically mentions s/n 57-3101. Later redesignated U-8D. If that trapezoidal feature on it's belly is a radar then it is a RL-23D. Or it could have been redesignated U-8D after 1962 and then converted to RU-8D. All that, of course according to Wikipedia. :-) TP |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
muff528 wrote:
"Andrew B" wrote in message om... "Don Pyeatt" wrote in message ... I bought a box of old negatives at an estate sale and found several aircraft images in the lot. Here are some samples. Is this a recon aircraft? My best guess would be a Beech L.23 Seminole. -- Andrew B (Cheshire, England) "Heavier-than-air flying machines are impossible." (Lord Kelvin, president, Royal Society, 1895.) Yep, according to "Wiki" it's a L-23D, and specifically mentions s/n 57-3101. Later redesignated U-8D. If that trapezoidal feature on it's belly is a radar then it is a RL-23D. Or it could have been redesignated U-8D after 1962 and then converted to RU-8D. All that, of course according to Wikipedia. :-) TP WINEBOTTLE, CEFISH PERSON, and CHECKMATE http://www.nsa.gov/vigilance/vigil00005.cfm Cheers, Dave |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Don Pyeatt" wrote in message ... I bought a box of old negatives at an estate sale and found several aircraft images in the lot. Here are some samples. Is this a recon aircraft? Yes AND No. It's a U-8 (also known as an RU-8.) The civialian version is the Beechcraft Queenair. For more info and pictures go to: www.globalsecurity.org/.../aircraft/u-8-pics.htm |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "CWO4 Dave Mann" wrote in message ... muff528 wrote: "Andrew B" wrote in message om... "Don Pyeatt" wrote in message ... I bought a box of old negatives at an estate sale and found several aircraft images in the lot. Here are some samples. Is this a recon aircraft? My best guess would be a Beech L.23 Seminole. -- Andrew B (Cheshire, England) "Heavier-than-air flying machines are impossible." (Lord Kelvin, president, Royal Society, 1895.) Yep, according to "Wiki" it's a L-23D, and specifically mentions s/n 57-3101. Later redesignated U-8D. If that trapezoidal feature on it's belly is a radar then it is a RL-23D. Or it could have been redesignated U-8D after 1962 and then converted to RU-8D. All that, of course according to Wikipedia. :-) TP WINEBOTTLE, CEFISH PERSON, and CHECKMATE http://www.nsa.gov/vigilance/vigil00005.cfm Cheers, Dave ......It's almost like you're typing out some sort of code or something! :-) BTW - Very interesting, and enlightening, article. Thanks, TP |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "muff528" wrote in message news:a4Kyj.3215$dB.1444@trnddc01... "CWO4 Dave Mann" wrote in message ... muff528 wrote: "Andrew B" wrote in message om... "Don Pyeatt" wrote in message ... I bought a box of old negatives at an estate sale and found several aircraft images in the lot. Here are some samples. Is this a recon aircraft? My best guess would be a Beech L.23 Seminole. -- Andrew B (Cheshire, England) "Heavier-than-air flying machines are impossible." (Lord Kelvin, president, Royal Society, 1895.) Yep, according to "Wiki" it's a L-23D, and specifically mentions s/n 57-3101. Later redesignated U-8D. If that trapezoidal feature on it's belly is a radar then it is a RL-23D. Or it could have been redesignated U-8D after 1962 and then converted to RU-8D. All that, of course according to Wikipedia. :-) TP WINEBOTTLE, CEFISH PERSON, and CHECKMATE http://www.nsa.gov/vigilance/vigil00005.cfm Cheers, Dave .....It's almost like you're typing out some sort of code or something! :-) BTW - Very interesting, and enlightening, article. Thanks, TP He's probably just checking to see if the Epsilon surveillance satellite is intercepting his mails. I used to have a list of trigger words that it was supposed to pick up on, but never had men in dark suits knocking at my ........ excuse me , there's someone at the door !! phew !! only the postman this time. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
muff528 wrote:
"CWO4 Dave Mann" wrote in message ... muff528 wrote: "Andrew B" wrote in message om... "Don Pyeatt" wrote in message ... I bought a box of old negatives at an estate sale and found several aircraft images in the lot. Here are some samples. Is this a recon aircraft? My best guess would be a Beech L.23 Seminole. -- Andrew B (Cheshire, England) "Heavier-than-air flying machines are impossible." (Lord Kelvin, president, Royal Society, 1895.) Yep, according to "Wiki" it's a L-23D, and specifically mentions s/n 57-3101. Later redesignated U-8D. If that trapezoidal feature on it's belly is a radar then it is a RL-23D. Or it could have been redesignated U-8D after 1962 and then converted to RU-8D. All that, of course according to Wikipedia. :-) TP WINEBOTTLE, CEFISH PERSON, and CHECKMATE http://www.nsa.gov/vigilance/vigil00005.cfm Cheers, Dave .....It's almost like you're typing out some sort of code or something! :-) BTW - Very interesting, and enlightening, article. Thanks, TP Sorry, TP ... my previous life took over (or was it the Special Controller Chip in my brain installed by NSA ---- Hummmm interesting choice of a phrase ... is that "the chip installed by NSA" OR "my brin installed by NSA"? Hang on a second, I've got to schratch my Anal Probe ..... ahhhhhhhh Anyway, if you Google for those Nicknames you'll fine various pointers to US Army Security Agency (ASA) flying platforms. The US uses Code Names, Nick Names and Project Names, according to a Joint Chiefs of Staff Manual. Code names are like this "JUMPSEAT" -- the unclassified codename for an atomic weapon test (and coincidentally for a type of National Imagery Asset). Nick Names are two words which are selected by a "Nick Name Assignment Schedule". For example, The US Army Intelligence and Security Command (USAINSCOM) might be assigned any first word beginning with the letters CE and any second word beginning with the letter L. So, we have CEFISH LADDER, CEFIRM LEADER, CEFIRM LANDER, and so on and so forth. Project names are unclassified names given to a particular project, for example, "ROUNDTABLE", the project name for something that I recall being read on for about 40 years ago but can't remember what it was (see NSA Brain, above). Lots of folks will use the word "GARDENPLOT" which is a US military domestic insurrection defense plan. However it is actually GARDEN PLOT. Now if you are at the CIA, you will use DI-GRAPH code names. MKULTRA, for instance. "MK" being the first part which designated the country or the entity to which the code name is applied. In this case, a CIA clandestine operation conducted within the USA's borders. ULTRA is simply a unique word thought up by someone in security. MKULTRA is also a very controversial and highly publicized CIA ****up. There is a rather ponderous book written by some investigative journalist (actually as I recall a quite unpatriotic, commie, pinko, fellow-travelers hippie wierdo destroyer of All that is Good, Mother, APple Pie and the American Way of Life (AWOL) and probable voter for Hillery) which I think has the word "Codenames" in the title. Seems to me that I read it some time ago and had to use a calculator to add up all the words I remembered. Anyway, hope this gives you a bit of a back ground. BTW, I also can give you a whole riff on the UK system, but shan't since when I worked with them on joint things they swore me to Utter Most Secrety whilst at the NAFI Cafeteria in Berlin over some most excellent Bangers and Bisquits and a Cuppa. Cheers, Dave PS attached is a GIF -- the mascot of an operation nicknamed "UNICYCLE FROG" |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dingo wrote:
"muff528" wrote in message news:a4Kyj.3215$dB.1444@trnddc01... "CWO4 Dave Mann" wrote in message ... muff528 wrote: "Andrew B" wrote in message om... "Don Pyeatt" wrote in message ... I bought a box of old negatives at an estate sale and found several aircraft images in the lot. Here are some samples. Is this a recon aircraft? My best guess would be a Beech L.23 Seminole. -- Andrew B (Cheshire, England) "Heavier-than-air flying machines are impossible." (Lord Kelvin, president, Royal Society, 1895.) Yep, according to "Wiki" it's a L-23D, and specifically mentions s/n 57-3101. Later redesignated U-8D. If that trapezoidal feature on it's belly is a radar then it is a RL-23D. Or it could have been redesignated U-8D after 1962 and then converted to RU-8D. All that, of course according to Wikipedia. :-) TP WINEBOTTLE, CEFISH PERSON, and CHECKMATE http://www.nsa.gov/vigilance/vigil00005.cfm Cheers, Dave .....It's almost like you're typing out some sort of code or something! :-) BTW - Very interesting, and enlightening, article. Thanks, TP He's probably just checking to see if the Epsilon surveillance satellite is intercepting his mails. I used to have a list of trigger words that it was supposed to pick up on, but never had men in dark suits knocking at my ....... excuse me , there's someone at the door !! phew !! only the postman this time. Hah! You must live in a country where the postman actually shows up? Here at my crib he or she sometimes arrives at noon, other times a 6 pm. Sometimes leaves mail in the mail box, sometimes tosses it onthe front porch. Oh, wait, there's a knock at My Door, I just go and answ........... |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PENTAGON CONSIDERING MILITARY BUILD UP AGAINST IRAN (Scroll down to comments section - see page 2 of the comments section as well): | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 19th 06 08:37 PM |
OSH '05 Comments | PPT33R | Piloting | 131 | August 29th 05 02:01 PM |
OSH '05 Comments | PPT33R | Owning | 119 | August 7th 05 02:32 AM |
Comments | Sniper@SDU/HKPF | Simulators | 2 | January 27th 04 12:09 PM |
comments? | Rosspilot | Piloting | 31 | January 1st 04 02:41 PM |