![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Looking at the worldwide surface analysis chart, it looks like land
areas have far more pressure variations than oceans. However, I am not sure if this is a real effect or simply an artifact of the fact that there aren't many observation stations on the oceans. Any thoughts? Here is an example: http://www.opc.ncep.noaa.gov/UA.shtml |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Andrew Sarangan" wrote in message ... Looking at the worldwide surface analysis chart, it looks like land areas have far more pressure variations than oceans. However, I am not sure if this is a real effect or simply an artifact of the fact that there aren't many observation stations on the oceans. Any thoughts? Here is an example: http://www.opc.ncep.noaa.gov/UA.shtml Lifting action? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bottom line is heating of the surface, Andrew. "Insolation" is the buzzword.
Over land, the amount of heat absorbed/reflected determines the amount and rate of rising air parcels...over water, the absorption rate is pretty constant. I'm not saying that there are no differences over water, only that the differences are small...the jet stream plays a part in moving pressure systems around on the face of the earth with little attention paid to the composition of the surface. Bob Gardner "Andrew Sarangan" wrote in message ... Looking at the worldwide surface analysis chart, it looks like land areas have far more pressure variations than oceans. However, I am not sure if this is a real effect or simply an artifact of the fact that there aren't many observation stations on the oceans. Any thoughts? Here is an example: http://www.opc.ncep.noaa.gov/UA.shtml |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 29, 8:39*pm, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
Andrew Sarangan wrote in news:50f64be0-71fb-47d0- : Looking at the worldwide surface analysis chart, it looks like land areas have far more pressure variations than oceans. However, I am not sure if this is a real effect or simply an artifact of the fact that there aren't many observation stations on the oceans. Any thoughts? Both land masses and oceans spawn pressure systems. The north atlantic is a good case in point, where the convergence of cold and warm air masses spun into a giant mess by coriolis produces wicked lows that can range as far down as 27.5 ( I've seen it this low *in western europe) Land masses are better at cooking up highs and I've seen it off the opposite end of the scale in the eastern US at well over 31 inches. You can also get this anywhere within spitting distance of Russia from one of the famous "siberian highs" BTW, when it gets that low or high at a teminal, ATC will only give you estimates of the pressure, particularly with highs. Their equipment doesn't go that far. Bertie Nope, wrong again. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
System Operation of Aircraft System | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 1 | October 12th 07 06:50 AM |
S-Tec System 20/30 Versus System 40/50 | Marco Leon | Piloting | 3 | November 9th 04 04:15 PM |
High Oil Pressure (was: Low oil pressure, high oil temp?) | Thomas Ploch | Owning | 4 | October 5th 04 04:34 AM |
Oil Pressure | Justin H | Home Built | 2 | September 23rd 04 04:35 AM |
Oh, the pressure! | Andrew Gideon | Piloting | 10 | April 20th 04 05:54 PM |