![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Can anyone give me a rundown as to which air craft is the best and the
salient points for the reasons The Saab aircraft , I would assume cost much less to build than the Eurofighter but would that decrease its effectiveness in a dog fight T.I.A. ........................Leslie -- Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service -------http://www.NewsDemon.com------ Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 10:50:36 -0400, Therefore wrote
(in article ): Can anyone give me a rundown as to which air craft is the best and the salient points for the reasons The Eurofighter Typhoon is, probably, a better pure air superiority machine than the SAAB Grippen. However, the Grippen is by far a better overall fighter, especially as the lead the Typhoon has in air superiority isn't that great. Neither of the two are likely to dethrone the current king of fighter aircraft, the Su-27 and derivatives thereof, which is considerably better than the F-15 and at least as good as the F-22. The Saab aircraft , I would assume cost much less to build than the Eurofighter but would that decrease its effectiveness in a dog fight The main reason the Grippen won't sell to the people who will by the Typhoon is the same reason why those people bought Tornadoes when Viggens were demonstrably superior. (Especially the RAF, which bought Tornado ADVs which were _utterly useless_, as their radars had to be removed and replaced by concrete balast 'cause they didn't bloody work for _years_. The concrete's gone now, but the radars still don't work the way they were supposed to. A long-range interceptor which doesn't have a working radar is, basically, a large lawn dart. The IDS version of the Tornado worked quite well, despite a high loss rate in Desert Storm, so it wasn't a design problem.) Basically, it's politics. The Swedes aren't a member of the EuroClub, so they'll get frozen out. T.I.A. ........................Leslie -- Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service -------http://www.NewsDemon.com------ Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
hielan' laddie wrote:
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 10:50:36 -0400, Therefore wrote (in article ): Can anyone give me a rundown as to which air craft is the best and the salient points for the reasons The Eurofighter Typhoon is, probably, a better pure air superiority machine than the SAAB Grippen. However, the Grippen is by far a better overall fighter, especially as the lead the Typhoon has in air superiority isn't that great. Neither of the two are likely to dethrone the current king of fighter aircraft, the Su-27 and derivatives thereof, which is considerably better than the F-15 and at least as good as the F-22. The Saab aircraft , I would assume cost much less to build than the Eurofighter but would that decrease its effectiveness in a dog fight The main reason the Grippen won't sell to the people who will by the Typhoon is the same reason why those people bought Tornadoes when Viggens were demonstrably superior. (Especially the RAF, which bought Tornado ADVs which were _utterly useless_, as their radars had to be removed and replaced by concrete balast 'cause they didn't bloody work for _years_. The concrete's gone now, but the radars still don't work the way they were supposed to. A long-range interceptor which doesn't have a working radar is, basically, a large lawn dart. The IDS version of the Tornado worked quite well, despite a high loss rate in Desert Storm, so it wasn't a design problem.) Basically, it's politics. The Swedes aren't a member of the EuroClub, so they'll get frozen out. T.I.A. ........................Leslie -- Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service -------http://www.NewsDemon.com------ Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access Surely, another reason why the Viggen didn't do well in international sales was because of an American veto as they were powered by American engines. -- Moving things in still pictures! |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 14:25:50 -0400, ®i©ardo wrote
(in article ): hielan' laddie wrote: On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 10:50:36 -0400, Therefore wrote (in article ): Can anyone give me a rundown as to which air craft is the best and the salient points for the reasons The Eurofighter Typhoon is, probably, a better pure air superiority machine than the SAAB Grippen. However, the Grippen is by far a better overall fighter, especially as the lead the Typhoon has in air superiority isn't that great. Neither of the two are likely to dethrone the current king of fighter aircraft, the Su-27 and derivatives thereof, which is considerably better than the F-15 and at least as good as the F-22. The Saab aircraft , I would assume cost much less to build than the Eurofighter but would that decrease its effectiveness in a dog fight The main reason the Grippen won't sell to the people who will by the Typhoon is the same reason why those people bought Tornadoes when Viggens were demonstrably superior. (Especially the RAF, which bought Tornado ADVs which were _utterly useless_, as their radars had to be removed and replaced by concrete balast 'cause they didn't bloody work for _years_. The concrete's gone now, but the radars still don't work the way they were supposed to. A long-range interceptor which doesn't have a working radar is, basically, a large lawn dart. The IDS version of the Tornado worked quite well, despite a high loss rate in Desert Storm, so it wasn't a design problem.) Basically, it's politics. The Swedes aren't a member of the EuroClub, so they'll get frozen out. T.I.A. ........................Leslie -- Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service -------http://www.NewsDemon.com------ Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access Surely, another reason why the Viggen didn't do well in international sales was because of an American veto as they were powered by American engines. That didn't help, but AFIK there's only one verified instance of a sale being blocked due to that. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Saab Viggen, concluded - Saab Viggen 54.jpg (1/1) | Mitchell Holman | Aviation Photos | 2 | August 19th 08 10:50 PM |
Saab Viggen, concluded - Saab Viggen 50.jpg (1/1) | Mitchell Holman | Aviation Photos | 3 | August 18th 08 11:06 PM |
Saab Viggen, concluded - Saab Viggen 48.jpg (1/1) | Mitchell Holman | Aviation Photos | 0 | August 18th 08 01:10 PM |
Saab Viggen, concluded - Saab Viggen 47.jpg (1/1) | Mitchell Holman | Aviation Photos | 0 | August 18th 08 01:10 PM |
Saab Viggen, concluded - Saab Viggen 46.jpg (1/1) | Mitchell Holman | Aviation Photos | 0 | August 18th 08 01:10 PM |