Is it too much to hope for?

On Sep 14, 1:26 am, Tman x@x wrote:
Bertie appears to be gone.

Probably working

Viperdoc wrote:
Ignoring either or both has not been effective

It's never been tried.

Ignoring either or both has not been effective

It's never been tried.

Amen!

Good observation!

And accurate, too.
--
Jim in NC

Viperdoc wrote:

Ignoring either or both has not been effective- someone always answers


Answering them is not ignoring them, actually ignoring them would have
worked.

Stella Starr wrote:
Viperdoc wrote:

Ignoring either or both has not been effective


It's never been tried.


I tried it and found it to be quite effective. Once I filtered them I never
saw their messages. I did see others responding to their messages, of
course. Had those people filtered them instead of biting the trolls would
have gone to another lake and this would still be a useful forum.

Tman x@x wrote in :

Bertie appears to be gone.


Appears being the operative word


Bertie

Jay Maynard wrote in
:

On 2008-09-13, Viperdoc wrote:
I would rather get rid of Anthony.

How about both?



Tch tch, censorship is a nasty trait in a superhero.



www.tronguy.com



Bertie

"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in
m:

Jay Maynard wrote:
On 2008-09-13, Viperdoc wrote:

I would rather get rid of Anthony.


How about both?


Had they simply been ignored they'd both be gone and this would still
be a useful forum.


Actually, no on both counts.


I actually like being ignored. it's one of my many gifts.


Bertie

"Morgans" wrote in :


"Tman" x@x wrote in message
. ..
Bertie appears to be gone.

Nope.

Still here; just changed names. That is his M.O., according to him.

Really?


Where did I say that you lying sack of ****?


Bertie

george wrote in news:9193773d-ba19-4b98-bb74-076c5da215e8
@x16g2000prn.googlegroups.com:

On Sep 14, 1:26 am, Tman x@x wrote:
Bertie appears to be gone.

Probably working


Yeah, every now and again....


But I'nm often on from various venues. This hotel had a fuxored wi-fi,
though..



Bertie