![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Okay, neither my flight manual nor maintenance manual say what kind of
fuses I should be using between the batteries and instruments. The printing on one looks to be T500L250V, which I understand to mean 0.5 amps, slow-blow, 250 Volts. (It's 5x20mm.) I know that to protect my wiring I need something in the 2 to 3 amp range, but slow-blow or fast-blow? Does it matter? In choosing the fuse, do I consider only the wiring to the instrument, or do I consider the instrument itself? (If it draws 300 mA peak, I imagine the fuse must be at least 600 mA.) I need to replace the blown T500L250V and get some spares for the others -- I just don't know what to order. ~ted/2NO (software guy) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Borget B400 uses quick acting 0.5amp fuse type "M205" (meaning 5 x20mm)
5x20mm 250Vac Borgelt B500 uses the same type in 1 amp any fuse manufacturers 5x20mm fast acting fuse would be acceptable in the proper value these should be easy to find wil almost any electronics supplier tim Please visit the Wings & Wheels website at www.wingsandwheels.com "Tuno" wrote in message ... Okay, neither my flight manual nor maintenance manual say what kind of fuses I should be using between the batteries and instruments. The printing on one looks to be T500L250V, which I understand to mean 0.5 amps, slow-blow, 250 Volts. (It's 5x20mm.) I know that to protect my wiring I need something in the 2 to 3 amp range, but slow-blow or fast-blow? Does it matter? In choosing the fuse, do I consider only the wiring to the instrument, or do I consider the instrument itself? (If it draws 300 mA peak, I imagine the fuse must be at least 600 mA.) I need to replace the blown T500L250V and get some spares for the others -- I just don't know what to order. ~ted/2NO (software guy) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ted:
You've gotten a good answer from Tim about the proper fuse to use, but you asked another good question that went unanswered and that is all too often overlooked. That is, what does the fuse protect? The answer is, as you suggested, the wiring. AC43.13 has wiring size tables for common A/C wires and the size fuse needed to protect them. It is a table worth having available somewhere in your shop. By referring to that table you can know what size fuse will safely protect the wire (gauge and run) it is connected to. The other question you asked -- does the fuse protect the instrument -- is more problematic. Generally speaking it does not because the instrument has an internal fuse to protect it. Not all do, of course, and some fuses are so difficult to access and replace that you'll wonder if you're better off putting a low value fuse before the instrument. These are individual decisions based on the instrument you're installing. Fred Fred LaSor SoaringNV Minden, NV |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Fred had some really great thoughts. One thing to add.
Fast blow versus slow blow? Slow blow seems like the easy way to helping to prevent blown fuses. Slow blow (slo-blo) fuses were created to handle devices with high "inrush" currents. That is, when you turn on this type of device, there is a high initial current draw for a short period (maybe 1-2 seconds) which settles down to a lower level. Simplistic examples are motors and incadesent light bulbs. Do you have any devices in your glider that need a slo-blo? Highly doubtful. I don't know of any "modern" (last 10+ years) avionics/ instruments that need slo-blo. I don't use any. Check the manual on all your devices to be sure. Finally, as to using one fuse total or using one fuse per device...this is a question in which you will get equal proponents on each side. I prefer one fuse directly at the battery. I run two batteries. My $0.02. - John DeRosa |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 9, 12:11*pm, ContestID67 wrote:
Finally, as to using one fuse total or using one fuse per device...this is a question in which you will get equal proponents on each side. *I prefer one fuse directly at the battery. *I run two batteries. I don't there is a choice to either fuse at the battery or to fuse at the instruments. There must be a fuse at, or in, each battery or you risk an in flight fire. The battery fuse (or circuit breaker) should be large enough to support all equipment but no larger than required to do that. The advantage of also having separate fuses for each item, or groups, of avionics is that a short at the panel or an internal avionics short, will only blow the local fuse and leave other equipment still working. This of course requires all fuses to be properly rated. I've never blown a fuse in flight in nearly 30 years of flying gliders, but I have blown fuses when working on the glider on the ground. For that reason I chose not to give up any panel space for fuses. They are all behind the panel and can be reached by raising one side of the canopy (ASW 28). Andy |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Another consideration on fusing batteries is that some battery
connectors allow you to plug one battery into another when they are on the charging shelf. The results are VERY messy and occasionally dangerous. If your batteries are ndividually fused the fuse will go before the wires melt and swell the battery case. Well worth the small cost of installing a fuse on each battery. Fred LaSor SoaringNV Minden, NV |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This is a timely thread for me...
I've been given the onerous task of maintaining the radios in our club's 6 gliders. This winter we are going to wire all 6 the same. The plan is to have a fuse at the battery, a main switch on the front panel that switches everything on and off and when off ties the battery to the charge connector. We also will move the charge connectors to the front of each ship. We are loosing a lot of batteries due to user stupidity or laziness. If they stay deeply discharged during the week, they lose most of their capacity. I am a proponent of a fuse at the battery. I am afraid that if the power wires got shorted somehow, they could either start a fire or create enough smoke to cause an accident. I have 2 ships that use a metal hose clamp to hold the battery down. I personally think that is a bad idea, as if the battery shifted, it would short to the hose clamp. Two questions: 1. What can I use instead of the hose clamps and where do I get it? 2. Any comments on our plan? Brian Bange At 19:11 09 December 2008, ContestID67 wrote: Fred had some really great thoughts. One thing to add. Fast blow versus slow blow? Slow blow seems like the easy way to helping to prevent blown fuses. Slow blow (slo-blo) fuses were created to handle devices with high "inrush" currents. That is, when you turn on this type of device, there is a high initial current draw for a short period (maybe 1-2 seconds) which settles down to a lower level. Simplistic examples are motors and incadesent light bulbs. Do you have any devices in your glider that need a slo-blo? Highly doubtful. I don't know of any "modern" (last 10+ years) avionics/ instruments that need slo-blo. I don't use any. Check the manual on all your devices to be sure. Finally, as to using one fuse total or using one fuse per device...this is a question in which you will get equal proponents on each side. I prefer one fuse directly at the battery. I run two batteries. My $0.02. - John DeRosa |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
First, a nit-pick; incandescent lamps are resistive and not inductive
and inrush isn't a common component. But low voltage lighting systems with a core and coil transformer is exactly what will pop a fast fuse. I would use Anderson Powerpole connectors and strap the batteries down with good-sized nylon ties, you can get quite large ones if needed. Or you could heat-shrink some parts of the hose clamp. Also, it sounds like the battery connectors you are using leave the connections exposed, if so an insulated connector is suggested. If using crimp connectors use Panduit brand or maybe AMP and NEVER use the cheap ones that you see everywhere. Anderson powerpoles will allow two batteries to be connected, but it will be + to + and - to - and that might be less entertaining. I guess if the batteries are at the same voltage nothing would happen. Anderson uses a small roll pin to join two connectors together, I really don't like the pins and let a little glue wick between them instead. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My opinion is that low current fuses on the panel (or behind it) are
more likely to cause problems than prevent them. I use just one fuse per battery circuit. I prefer a 10 amp automotive blade fuse mounted at the battery. If it might be of interest, I've prepared a short treatise on glider battery wiring and fusing including a picture which is accessed at this page: http://www.wingrigger.com/wingrigger5_005.htm Steve Koerner GW |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Brian:
Sounds like a good plan. I like the Anderson powerpole connectors mainly because they have enough friction during connection to wipe the surface clean of any oxidation, so give a good connection. I don't use the roll pin to hold the two terminals together -- just squirt a little hot melt into the matching indents. And yes, the automotive blade fuses are an excellent installation on one of the battery terminals. As for holding batteries down, I agree a metal hose clamp is an accident waiting to happen. What's wrong with a short piece of bungee cord? Fred LaSor SoaringNV Minden, NV |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
resettable fuses - US source? | Gary Emerson | Soaring | 12 | November 9th 07 10:09 PM |
fuses vs. circuit breakers | raulb | Soaring | 0 | November 8th 07 02:48 PM |
Bussman Fuses | kevmor | Piloting | 10 | May 25th 07 03:25 AM |
Bussman Fuses | kevmor | Piloting | 2 | May 22nd 07 09:28 PM |
Fuses versus Breakers | ContestID67 | Soaring | 14 | March 14th 05 01:47 PM |