![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Not a "Which was the best fighter" but a discussion of the strengths -
weaknesses of each. Since the Hellcat had limited post WW II use, I would like to limit discussion to the WW II service of each type. I would be especially interested in any comments about the Fleet Air Arm (British) use of both types. I have access to all of the performance and technical specifications for each type by the way. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Jack G" wrote: Not a "Which was the best fighter" but a discussion of the strengths - weaknesses of each. Since the Hellcat had limited post WW II use, I would like to limit discussion to the WW II service of each type. I would be especially interested in any comments about the Fleet Air Arm (British) use of both types. I have access to all of the performance and technical specifications for each type by the way. I used to know a postwar US Navy pilot who flew both. He said that the Hellcat was a very stable gun platform and that the Corsair was more of a "pilot's airplane," in that it had far more sensitive controls and was easier to maneuver. He said that the Hellcat flew like a great, big Cub. He also told me that the Hellcat aces had excelled primarily in gunnery and that the Corsair aces had excelled in pilot training. -- Remove _'s from email address to talk to me. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jack G" wrote in message ... Not a "Which was the best fighter" but a discussion of the strengths - weaknesses of each. Since the Hellcat had limited post WW II use, I would like to limit discussion to the WW II service of each type. I would be especially interested in any comments about the Fleet Air Arm (British) use of both types. I have access to all of the performance and technical specifications for each type by the way. The criticism the FAA had about the Hellcat was that the Americans wouldnt supply enough of them ![]() The Corsair seems to have been a much more difficult aircraft to operate off carriers, especially the early models. The RN persisted with it after it failed its US carrier quals and found the extra performance it offered over the Hellcat worth the trouble. Both types operated with the RN during the air attacks on Tirpitz but the Luftwaffe was conspicuous by its absence and the Hellcats seem to have been operating as fighter bombers carrying 500lb AP bombs. In the Pacific both types were used as escorts for Avengers on strikes with the shorter range Seafires operating the CAP. A number of the British carriers had insufficient hangar headroom to operate either Hellcats or Corsairs which is why the Seafires were included in the British Pacific Fleet Keith |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Hellcat vs Corsair | JP[_3_] | Aviation Photos | 0 | September 25th 07 10:04 PM |
Hellcat | Pjmac35 | Aviation Photos | 10 | July 28th 07 09:38 PM |
Another Corsair pic for Russell - Another Corsair pic.jpg (1/1) | Just Plane Noise[_2_] | Aviation Photos | 2 | July 26th 07 12:36 PM |
Another Corsair pic for Russell - Another Corsair pic.jpg (0/1) | Just Plane Noise[_2_] | Aviation Photos | 1 | July 26th 07 03:28 AM |