![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi
I'm conducting a survey for my aeronautics course and I was hoping you all could help me out. I'm focusing on smaller single reciprocating, nonturbine engine aircrafts and I wanted to know what are the most important features/expectations when considering a STOL and/or Light Sport aircraft? Whether you are looking to buy, build, or just fly. Any and all opinions are appreciated. Thanks |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
aerojones wrote:
Hi I'm conducting a survey for my aeronautics course and I was hoping you all could help me out. I'm focusing on smaller single reciprocating, nonturbine engine aircrafts and I wanted to know what are the most important features/expectations when considering a STOL and/or Light Sport aircraft? Whether you are looking to buy, build, or just fly. I think you need to limit your survey more. What a bush pilot wants in a STOL is a lot different than what a SLSA pilot wants which is different than what an ultralight pilot wants. Focus on one of these groups. I fly an SLSA and the most important thing for me is an economical cruise as close to 120 knots as possible, along with comfort and reliability. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I'm actually trying to integrate the short take off and landing with a higher cruise speed. So I would like to understand the most important aspects of both categories. I appreciate your response. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I agree with the apples and oranges comment.
For an LSA a cruise speed near 120 knots, a fuel burn of 5 gallons or less per hour, and the ability to carry 2 'normal' sized people + a bit of baggage (say 400 pounds total) with a 4 hour range would look good to me. -- Best Regards, Mike. http://flickr.com/photos/mikenoel/ http://photoshow.comcast.net/mikenoel "Jim Stewart" wrote in message ... aerojones wrote: Hi I'm conducting a survey for my aeronautics course and I was hoping you all could help me out. I'm focusing on smaller single reciprocating, nonturbine engine aircrafts and I wanted to know what are the most important features/expectations when considering a STOL and/or Light Sport aircraft? Whether you are looking to buy, build, or just fly. I think you need to limit your survey more. What a bush pilot wants in a STOL is a lot different than what a SLSA pilot wants which is different than what an ultralight pilot wants. Focus on one of these groups. I fly an SLSA and the most important thing for me is an economical cruise as close to 120 knots as possible, along with comfort and reliability. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
aerojones wrote:
'Jim Stewart[_2_ Wrote: ;681553']aerojones wrote:- Hi I'm conducting a survey for my aeronautics course and I was hoping you all could help me out. I'm focusing on smaller single reciprocating, nonturbine engine aircrafts and I wanted to know what are the most important features/expectations when considering a STOL and/or Light Sport aircraft? Whether you are looking to buy, build, or just fly.- I think you need to limit your survey more. What a bush pilot wants in a STOL is a lot different than what a SLSA pilot wants which is different than what an ultralight pilot wants. Focus on one of these groups. I fly an SLSA and the most important thing for me is an economical cruise as close to 120 knots as possible, along with comfort and reliability. I'm actually trying to integrate the short take off and landing with a higher cruise speed. So I would like to understand the most important aspects of both categories. I appreciate your response. I fly a Flight Design CTSW. It cruises nicely at 110 knots and, with a little skill and a little headwind, will land in 500 feet. With flaps 40 and more skill it can descend steeply and land in 300 feet or so. Likewise, on a cool day with full fuel and no passengers, 1000 fpm climb is normal. On a hot day, fully loaded, 500-600 fpm at sea level. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 4, 4:48*pm, aerojones
wrote: 'Jim Stewart[_2_ Wrote: ;681553']aerojones wrote:- Hi I'm conducting a survey for my aeronautics course and I was hoping you all could help me out. I'm focusing on smaller single reciprocating, nonturbine engine aircrafts and I wanted to know what are the most important features/expectations when considering a STOL and/or Light Sport aircraft? Whether you are looking to buy, build, or just fly.- I think you need to limit your survey more. What a bush pilot wants in a STOL is a lot different than what a SLSA pilot wants which is different than what an ultralight pilot wants. *Focus on one of these groups. I fly an SLSA and the most important thing for me is an economical cruise as close to 120 knots as possible, along with comfort and reliability. I'm actually trying to integrate the short take off and landing with a higher cruise speed. So I would like to understand the most important aspects of both categories. I appreciate your response. -- aerojones- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Maybe you need to define what you mean by "higer" cruise speed since (at least in the US) there is a regulatory-established on maxium airspeed for LSA. I understand that the Flight Design CT designs (CT2K, CTSW, CTLS) will cruise faster with changes to the prop, but cannot if they want retain their LSA certification. I'm sure this is true for many other LSA's too. take care . . . John |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
John wrote:
On Feb 4, 4:48 pm, aerojones wrote: 'Jim Stewart[_2_ Wrote: ;681553']aerojones wrote:- Hi I'm conducting a survey for my aeronautics course and I was hoping you all could help me out. I'm focusing on smaller single reciprocating, nonturbine engine aircrafts and I wanted to know what are the most important features/expectations when considering a STOL and/or Light Sport aircraft? Whether you are looking to buy, build, or just fly.- I think you need to limit your survey more. What a bush pilot wants in a STOL is a lot different than what a SLSA pilot wants which is different than what an ultralight pilot wants. Focus on one of these groups. I fly an SLSA and the most important thing for me is an economical cruise as close to 120 knots as possible, along with comfort and reliability. I'm actually trying to integrate the short take off and landing with a higher cruise speed. So I would like to understand the most important aspects of both categories. I appreciate your response. -- aerojones- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Maybe you need to define what you mean by "higer" cruise speed since (at least in the US) there is a regulatory-established on maxium airspeed for LSA. I understand that the Flight Design CT designs (CT2K, CTSW, CTLS) will cruise faster with changes to the prop, but cannot if they want retain their LSA certification. I'm sure this is true for many other LSA's too. take care . . . John |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
John wrote:
On Feb 4, 4:48 pm, aerojones wrote: 'Jim Stewart[_2_ Wrote: ;681553']aerojones wrote:- Hi I'm conducting a survey for my aeronautics course and I was hoping you all could help me out. I'm focusing on smaller single reciprocating, nonturbine engine aircrafts and I wanted to know what are the most important features/expectations when considering a STOL and/or Light Sport aircraft? Whether you are looking to buy, build, or just fly.- I think you need to limit your survey more. What a bush pilot wants in a STOL is a lot different than what a SLSA pilot wants which is different than what an ultralight pilot wants. Focus on one of these groups. I fly an SLSA and the most important thing for me is an economical cruise as close to 120 knots as possible, along with comfort and reliability. I'm actually trying to integrate the short take off and landing with a higher cruise speed. So I would like to understand the most important aspects of both categories. I appreciate your response. -- aerojones- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Maybe you need to define what you mean by "higer" cruise speed since (at least in the US) there is a regulatory-established on maxium airspeed for LSA. The maximum cruise speed is specified by regulation, but many LSA's can't cruise that fast. That was my deal-killer on the Evektor SportStar. An otherwise excellent plane, but comfortable cruise was about 90 knots on the one I flew. Comfortable cruise on my CTSW is 105-110 knots. Admittedly, "comfortable cruise" is my subjective term for least noise and vibration and best fuel economy. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 9, 1:46*pm, Jim Stewart wrote:
John wrote: On Feb 4, 4:48 pm, aerojones wrote: 'Jim Stewart[_2_ Wrote: ;681553']aerojones wrote:- Hi I'm conducting a survey for my aeronautics course and I was hoping you all could help me out. I'm focusing on smaller single reciprocating, nonturbine engine aircrafts and I wanted to know what are the most important features/expectations when considering a STOL and/or Light Sport aircraft? Whether you are looking to buy, build, or just fly.- I think you need to limit your survey more. What a bush pilot wants in a STOL is a lot different than what a SLSA pilot wants which is different than what an ultralight pilot wants. *Focus on one of these groups. I fly an SLSA and the most important thing for me is an economical cruise as close to 120 knots as possible, along with comfort and reliability. I'm actually trying to integrate the short take off and landing with a higher cruise speed. So I would like to understand the most important aspects of both categories. I appreciate your response. -- aerojones- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Maybe you need to define what you mean by "higer" cruise speed since (at least in the US) there is a regulatory-established on maxium airspeed for LSA. The maximum cruise speed is specified by regulation, but many LSA's can't cruise that fast. *That was my deal-killer on the Evektor SportStar. *An otherwise excellent plane, but comfortable cruise was about 90 knots on the one I flew. *Comfortable cruise on my CTSW is 105-110 knots. Admittedly, "comfortable cruise" is my subjective term for least noise and vibration and best fuel economy.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Mr. Stewart, Curious about two things regarding your CTSW at "comfortable cruise" How long is the endurance of the plane (assuming full tanks at the start)? (Probably longer than the endurance of my bottom or my bladder) How many gallons per hour do you burn at 105 - 110 knots? Thanks and take care . . . John |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
John wrote:
On Feb 9, 1:46 pm, Jim Stewart wrote: John wrote: On Feb 4, 4:48 pm, aerojones wrote: 'Jim Stewart[_2_ Wrote: ;681553']aerojones wrote:- Hi I'm conducting a survey for my aeronautics course and I was hoping you all could help me out. I'm focusing on smaller single reciprocating, nonturbine engine aircrafts and I wanted to know what are the most important features/expectations when considering a STOL and/or Light Sport aircraft? Whether you are looking to buy, build, or just fly.- I think you need to limit your survey more. What a bush pilot wants in a STOL is a lot different than what a SLSA pilot wants which is different than what an ultralight pilot wants. Focus on one of these groups. I fly an SLSA and the most important thing for me is an economical cruise as close to 120 knots as possible, along with comfort and reliability. I'm actually trying to integrate the short take off and landing with a higher cruise speed. So I would like to understand the most important aspects of both categories. I appreciate your response. -- aerojones- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Maybe you need to define what you mean by "higer" cruise speed since (at least in the US) there is a regulatory-established on maxium airspeed for LSA. The maximum cruise speed is specified by regulation, but many LSA's can't cruise that fast. That was my deal-killer on the Evektor SportStar. An otherwise excellent plane, but comfortable cruise was about 90 knots on the one I flew. Comfortable cruise on my CTSW is 105-110 knots. Admittedly, "comfortable cruise" is my subjective term for least noise and vibration and best fuel economy.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Mr. Stewart, Curious about two things regarding your CTSW at "comfortable cruise" How long is the endurance of the plane (assuming full tanks at the start)? (Probably longer than the endurance of my bottom or my bladder 34 gallons, 32 useable, 7 hours minus reserves. How many gallons per hour do you burn at 105 - 110 knots? 4.5 Here are the specs. They seem to agree closely with my plane's performance.. http://www.flightdesignusa.com/specs.asp |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How to compare/valuation of features | Douglas Paterson | Owning | 10 | January 28th 07 10:14 PM |
Flying Club Features | Andy | Piloting | 28 | April 14th 05 10:15 PM |
GPS Visualizer update: a few new features | Adam Schneider | Soaring | 1 | January 11th 05 10:49 PM |
GPS Visualizer now features very-hi-res U.S. city maps | Adam Schneider | Soaring | 0 | June 2nd 04 04:02 AM |
features, like printing al owens nice 8/5 x 11 | llaa1100 | Owning | 0 | July 18th 03 07:20 PM |