![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike Ash wrote:
In article , Tom Duhamel wrote: Gliders fly at lower altitudes, at lower speeds, in good weather conditions... Airliners fly in high altitude, high speed, low temperature, in thunderstorms... Don't think airliners fly higher. It's true that *on average* they do, and they certainly collect *vastly* more time at FL360 than gliders do, but gliders *do* collect time there. The current glider altitude record, set in a composite glider, is over 50,000ft. I don't think low temperatures or pressures have been seen to do anything bad to the structure. A fellow did tell me once that a rapid descent can do bad things to the gelcoat due to the temperature change, but that's a separate issue, and I don't know if an airliner would even use that sort of coating. For speeds, that's really just a matter of increased structural strength and stiffness, which means using more stuff or different shapes. The question is how the composites tolerate load, which is well known. They won't change their characteristics suddenly just because they're moving. How good is composite when lightning strikes? Doesn't is explode or something? I don't think it will conduct electricity, does it? This one is a completely open question to me. No, they don't conduct electricity as far as I know. In the one famous case of a glider getting hit by lightning, the lightning traveled along metal control rods. The rods superheated the air inside the wings, blowing the glider to bits. Obviously this is not a desirable outcome for an airliner carrying 300 people and no parachutes. I can only assume that the smart engineers working on this stuff have figured out a way to stop this from happening, but I have no idea at all what that way would be. Embedded conductive layers. http://www.lightningtech.com/d~ta/faq1.html -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tom Duhamel wrote:
How good is composite when lightning strikes? The following article titled "Building the 787: When lightning strikes" may provide some background: http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/htm..._boeing05.html Doesn't is explode or something? Probably depends on its electrical conductivity, which in turn depends on the composition and construction of the fiber. (With enough current you can even explode a conductor; something of interest to scientists studying plasmas - and people who like to blow things up: http://tesladownunder.com/Pulse_Power.htm http://etd.caltech.edu/etd/available...022006-104759/ http://www.plasmacenter.cornell.edu/ExplodingWires.html ) I don't think it will conduct electricity, does it? Depends on the composite. If it is carbon fiber, then it can be made to conduct electricity: "The fiber also finds use in filtration of high-temperature gasses, as an electrode with high surface area and impeccable corrosion resistance, and as an anti-static component." From: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon_fiber |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
wrote: How good is composite when lightning strikes? Doesn't is explode or something? I don't think it will conduct electricity, does it? This one is a completely open question to me. No, they don't conduct electricity as far as I know. In the one famous case of a glider getting hit by lightning, the lightning traveled along metal control rods. The rods superheated the air inside the wings, blowing the glider to bits. Obviously this is not a desirable outcome for an airliner carrying 300 people and no parachutes. I can only assume that the smart engineers working on this stuff have figured out a way to stop this from happening, but I have no idea at all what that way would be. Embedded conductive layers. http://www.lightningtech.com/d~ta/faq1.html Cool stuff. Thanks! -- Mike Ash Radio Free Earth Broadcasting from our climate-controlled studios deep inside the Moon |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 23, 9:39*am, Tom Duhamel wrote:
Gliders fly at lower altitudes, at lower speeds, in good weather conditions... Up until you start flying in wave and get intimate with rotor. And they (generally) have to be rigged every time you want to go flying and there are some rough handlers out there ! |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
george wrote:
Gliders fly at lower altitudes, at lower speeds, in good weather conditions... Up until you start flying in wave and get intimate with rotor. Or within a cumulus congestus. But agreed, they don't have a pressurized cabin and are usually stored in shelter. |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave Doe wrote:
Humans seem to conduct quite well, check out this Indian (meeting his maker) on top of a train. Warning, some might find it a bit graphic, so don't watch it... http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=fc0_1243424473 On the contrary, it's actually because we don't conduct electricity well that we suffer from it. Since we resist current, we burn (not mentioning the effect on some of our organs). Nice video, but not to be shown to children! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Another AirBus-320 question | pintlar | Home Built | 18 | November 7th 11 06:04 AM |
Stupid question about birds and planes | Peter Hucker[_2_] | Aviation Photos | 1 | January 2nd 08 06:05 PM |
airbus - Latest Plane From Airbus.jpg | [email protected] | Aviation Photos | 14 | June 26th 07 09:41 AM |
A question on Airbus landings | [email protected] | Piloting | 17 | July 18th 06 09:05 PM |
Question Regarding 9/11 Planes... | builderbos | Piloting | 28 | April 26th 04 11:33 PM |