![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I just purchased a glider that has a Special Airworthiness Cert.,
Experimental Category, Exhibition and Racing. The "Date of Issuance" was 5/6/1983, as was the Operating Limitations and log entry. To the right of the Issuance date on the certificate is the "Expiry" which shows one year later as 5/5/1984. The operating limitations makes no mention of an expiration, in fact it has the paragraph stating that "no person shall operate...unless condition inspections are done in the preceding 12 months" (which would be for the second and future years), and it mentions condition inspections (plural) are to be recorded. The entry in the log by the same FAA Rep. makes no mention of an expiration. This would have me think that the intent of the FAA representative was to make the certificate of unlimited duration as I would expect. The FAA database also shows no problems that I can tell, such as an expired airworthiness certificate. Is this typical to have an "Expiry" date on the cert. or do I have an issue? I hate to lose my loose operating limitations by having to apply again. Can anyone explain? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 29, 9:13*pm, PS wrote:
I just purchased a glider that has a Special Airworthiness Cert., Experimental Category, Exhibition and Racing. The "Date of Issuance" was 5/6/1983, as was the Operating Limitations and log entry. To the right of the Issuance date on the certificate is the "Expiry" which shows one year later as 5/5/1984. The operating limitations makes no mention of an expiration, in fact it has the paragraph stating that "no person shall operate...unless condition inspections are done in the preceding 12 months" (which would be for the second and future years), and it mentions condition inspections (plural) are to be recorded. The entry in the log by the same FAA Rep. makes no mention of an expiration. This would have me think that the intent of the FAA representative was to make the certificate of unlimited duration as I would expect. The FAA database also shows no problems that I can tell, such as an expired airworthiness certificate. Is this typical to have an "Expiry" date on the cert. or do I have an issue? I hate to lose my loose operating limitations by having to apply again. Can anyone explain? Expiry means expired. My company has two ships we use for R&D, they are both "Expiry" and had to get a ferry permit. We now half to reapply for a new cert. Put it back to stock and try to get you Std ATC back. aerodyne |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 29, 9:13=A0pm, PS wrote:
I just purchased a glider that has a Special Airworthiness Cert., Experimental Category, Exhibition and Racing. The "Date of Issuance" was 5/6/1983, as was the Operating Limitations and log entry. To the right of the Issuance date on the certificate is the "Expiry" which shows one year later as 5/5/1984. The operating limitations makes no mention of an expiration, in fact it has the paragraph stating that "no person shall operate... unless condition inspections are done in the preceding 12 months" (which would be for the second and future years), and it mentions condition inspections (plural) are to be recorded. The entry in the log by the same FAA Rep. makes no mention of an expiration. This would have me think that the intent of the FAA representative was to make the certificate of unlimited duration as I would expect. The FAA database also shows no problems that I can tell, such as an expired airworthiness certificate. Is this typical to have an "Expiry" date on the cert. or do I have an issue? I hate to lose my loose operating limitations by having to apply again. Can anyone explain? ******** Buy the FAA records on the plane and see if it got a new Airworthiness at some time. If not, you should be able to apply for a new airworthiness certificate. Try to get them to leave the limitations as they are, but don't be surprised if you get stuck with the current limitations which require a yearly program letter, etc. Not too long after the moratorium came into effect, I was able to get ammended limitations on one of my gliders to put the gross weight back up where it had been before the most recent set was issued. Didn't get the requirement for a program letter. Maybe you can have similar luck. But as it stands now, in the eyes of the FAA, if your airworthiness certificate has an expiration date in the past, and you don't have a subesquent one, your airplane is not airworthy. Steve |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 29, 9:13=A0pm, PS wrote:
I just purchased a glider that has a Special Airworthiness Cert., Experimental Category, Exhibition and Racing. The "Date of Issuance" was 5/6/1983, as was the Operating Limitations and log entry. To the right of the Issuance date on the certificate is the "Expiry" which shows one year later as 5/5/1984. The operating limitations makes no mention of an expiration, in fact it has the paragraph stating that "no person shall operate... unless condition inspections are done in the preceding 12 months" (which would be for the second and future years), and it mentions condition inspections (plural) are to be recorded. The entry in the log by the same FAA Rep. makes no mention of an expiration. This would have me think that the intent of the FAA representative was to make the certificate of unlimited duration as I would expect. The FAA database also shows no problems that I can tell, such as an expired airworthiness certificate. Is this typical to have an "Expiry" date on the cert. or do I have an issue? I hate to lose my loose operating limitations by having to apply again. Can anyone explain? ******** Buy the FAA records on the plane and see if it got a new Airworthiness at some time. If not, you should be able to apply for a new airworthiness certificate. Try to get them to leave the limitations as they are, but don't be surprised if you get stuck with the current limitations which require a yearly program letter, etc. Not too long after the moratorium came into effect, I was able to get ammended limitations on one of my gliders to put the gross weight back up where it had been before the most recent set was issued. Didn't get the requirement for a program letter. Maybe you can have similar luck. But as it stands now, in the eyes of the FAA, if your airworthiness certificate has an expiration date in the past, and you don't have a subesquent one, your airplane is not airworthy. Steve |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 29, 9:26*pm, wrote:
Put it back to stock and try to get you Std ATC back. This is likely an imported sailplane for which an approved type certificate was never available in the US, so there probably is no "Std ATC" to get back. For example, all Schleicher ASW-20 in the US carry Experimental, Racing or Experimental, Exhibition special airworthiness certificates. Thanks, Bob K. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 29, 10:16*pm, Bob Kuykendall wrote:
On Jun 29, 9:26*pm, wrote: Put it back to stock and try to get you Std ATC back. This is likely an imported sailplane for which an approved type certificate was never available in the US, so there probably is no "Std ATC" to get back. For example, all Schleicher ASW-20 in the US carry Experimental, Racing or Experimental, Exhibition special airworthiness certificates. Thanks, Bob K. Hey! Don't leave out my beloved Speed Astir!! (Amongst MANY others ;- p ) |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Read the certificate....many operators might be surprised to find the
gliders or aircraft they are flying with experimental certificates have limitations and have expired...hence are illegal to operate...the certificate and the associated operating limitations were issued to the owner's aircraft by their controlling agency (FSDO) and can apply to operations by that aircraft while it is under the jurisdiction of that issuing agency...when it is sold and moved the certificate and limitations unless otherwise stated in the same are null and void.... tim "PS" wrote in message ... I just purchased a glider that has a Special Airworthiness Cert., Experimental Category, Exhibition and Racing. The "Date of Issuance" was 5/6/1983, as was the Operating Limitations and log entry. To the right of the Issuance date on the certificate is the "Expiry" which shows one year later as 5/5/1984. The operating limitations makes no mention of an expiration, in fact it has the paragraph stating that "no person shall operate...unless condition inspections are done in the preceding 12 months" (which would be for the second and future years), and it mentions condition inspections (plural) are to be recorded. The entry in the log by the same FAA Rep. makes no mention of an expiration. This would have me think that the intent of the FAA representative was to make the certificate of unlimited duration as I would expect. The FAA database also shows no problems that I can tell, such as an expired airworthiness certificate. Is this typical to have an "Expiry" date on the cert. or do I have an issue? I hate to lose my loose operating limitations by having to apply again. Can anyone explain? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 30, 12:13*am, PS wrote:
I just purchased a glider that has a Special Airworthiness Cert., Experimental Category, Exhibition and Racing. The "Date of Issuance" was 5/6/1983, as was the Operating Limitations and log entry. To the right of the Issuance date on the certificate is the "Expiry" which shows one year later as 5/5/1984. The operating limitations makes no mention of an expiration, in fact it has the paragraph stating that "no person shall operate...unless condition inspections are done in the preceding 12 months" (which would be for the second and future years), and it mentions condition inspections (plural) are to be recorded. The entry in the log by the same FAA Rep. makes no mention of an expiration. This would have me think that the intent of the FAA representative was to make the certificate of unlimited duration as I would expect. The FAA database also shows no problems that I can tell, such as an expired airworthiness certificate. Is this typical to have an "Expiry" date on the cert. or do I have an issue? I hate to lose my loose operating limitations by having to apply again. Can anyone explain? Reading of text will probably show that this date is 12 months to the day from issuance. This requires condition inspection after which it would be good for 12 months to the day. read the paragrapg related to condition inspection. Duration, other than that condition, was unlimited and none had geographical limitations, to my knowledge. All of that changed when new rules were published effective 7/9/97. After that time, the current requirements to be controlled by your local district office, area limitatiions, etc., went into effect. DON'T lose your old limitations, you likely would not get them again. That said, read what the text says and comply. Good luck UH |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 30, 1:10*pm, wrote:
On Jun 30, 12:13*am, PS wrote: I just purchased a glider that has a Special Airworthiness Cert., Experimental Category, Exhibition and Racing. The "Date of Issuance" was 5/6/1983, as was the Operating Limitations and log entry. To the right of the Issuance date on the certificate is the "Expiry" which shows one year later as 5/5/1984. The operating limitations makes no mention of an expiration, in fact it has the paragraph stating that "no person shall operate...unless condition inspections are done in the preceding 12 months" (which would be for the second and future years), and it mentions condition inspections (plural) are to be recorded. The entry in the log by the same FAA Rep. makes no mention of an expiration. This would have me think that the intent of the FAA representative was to make the certificate of unlimited duration as I would expect. The FAA database also shows no problems that I can tell, such as an expired airworthiness certificate. Is this typical to have an "Expiry" date on the cert. or do I have an issue? I hate to lose my loose operating limitations by having to apply again. Can anyone explain? Reading of text will probably show that this date is 12 months to the day from issuance. This requires condition inspection after which it would be good for 12 months to the day. read the paragrapg related to condition inspection. Duration, other than that condition, was unlimited and none had geographical limitations, to my knowledge. All of that changed when new rules were published effective 7/9/97. After that time, the current requirements to be controlled by your local district office, area limitatiions, etc., went into effect. DON'T lose your old limitations, you likely would not get them again. That said, read what the text says and comply. Good luck UH- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Thanks UH, I like your interpretation best. I would feel more comfortable with this if the operating limitations more clearly stated that a condition inspection would extend the special airworthiness cert. for another 12 months. Are you saying that since the operating limitations do not state an expiration, but instead state that condition inspections are required every 12 months, that this supersedes the expiration date shown on the airworthiness certificate (which was one year from the issue date)?? Is there an FAA Order or an FAA rep. that can clarify this? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 30, 3:28*pm, PS wrote:
On Jun 30, 1:10*pm, wrote: On Jun 30, 12:13*am, PS wrote: I just purchased a glider that has a Special Airworthiness Cert., Experimental Category, Exhibition and Racing. The "Date of Issuance" was 5/6/1983, as was the Operating Limitations and log entry. To the right of the Issuance date on the certificate is the "Expiry" which shows one year later as 5/5/1984. The operating limitations makes no mention of an expiration, in fact it has the paragraph stating that "no person shall operate...unless condition inspections are done in the preceding 12 months" (which would be for the second and future years), and it mentions condition inspections (plural) are to be recorded. The entry in the log by the same FAA Rep. makes no mention of an expiration. This would have me think that the intent of the FAA representative was to make the certificate of unlimited duration as I would expect. The FAA database also shows no problems that I can tell, such as an expired airworthiness certificate. Is this typical to have an "Expiry" date on the cert. or do I have an issue? I hate to lose my loose operating limitations by having to apply again. Can anyone explain? Reading of text will probably show that this date is 12 months to the day from issuance. This requires condition inspection after which it would be good for 12 months to the day. read the paragrapg related to condition inspection. Duration, other than that condition, was unlimited and none had geographical limitations, to my knowledge. All of that changed when new rules were published effective 7/9/97. After that time, the current requirements to be controlled by your local district office, area limitatiions, etc., went into effect. DON'T lose your old limitations, you likely would not get them again. That said, read what the text says and comply. Good luck UH- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Thanks UH, I like your interpretation best. I would feel more comfortable with this if the operating limitations more clearly stated that a condition inspection would extend the special airworthiness cert. for another 12 months. Are you saying that since the operating limitations do not state an expiration, but instead state that condition inspections are required every 12 months, that this supersedes the expiration date shown on the airworthiness certificate (which was one year from the issue date)?? Is there an FAA Order or an FAA rep. that can clarify this?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - To be safe, you could take your docs to your local district office for interpretation. That said, you might not like what they say. These days they really want to control activity on Experimental- Exhibition and Air Racing licensed ships. I would be surprised if you certificate is not unlimited, subject to condition inspections. UH I |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FAA Airworthiness *grumbles* | noel.wade | Soaring | 19 | March 12th 08 04:54 PM |
TBO and airworthiness | Jim Stewart | Owning | 26 | April 17th 07 05:05 PM |
USA Glider Experimental Airworthiness Certificate | charlie foxtrot | Soaring | 4 | April 15th 06 05:04 AM |
Teaching airworthiness | Roger Long | Piloting | 28 | October 2nd 03 09:08 PM |
Airworthiness certification of an experimental | Ace Pilot | Home Built | 0 | July 16th 03 03:26 PM |