![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Think I'll see if I can squeeze into a 152 Aerobat
in the morning. I'm 6' 3". Think I'll fit? I ain't flying bent over! --- Mark |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 14, 12:27*pm, Mark wrote:
Think I'll see if I can squeeze into a 152 Aerobat in the morning. *I'm 6' 3". *Think I'll fit? *I ain't flying bent over! The problem is fitting your legs under the instruemnt panel... Cheers |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 13, 6:56*pm, "Flaps_50!" wrote:
On Dec 14, 12:27*pm, Mark wrote: Think I'll see if I can squeeze into a 152 Aerobat in the morning. *I'm 6' 3". *Think I'll fit? *I ain't flying bent over! The problem is fitting your legs under the instruemnt panel... Cheers Can't you slide the seat back like a 172? --- Mark |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 13, 7:08*pm, Mark wrote:
On Dec 13, 6:56*pm, "Flaps_50!" wrote: On Dec 14, 12:27*pm, Mark wrote: Think I'll see if I can squeeze into a 152 Aerobat in the morning. *I'm 6' 3". *Think I'll fit? *I ain't flying bent over! The problem is fitting your legs under the instruemnt panel... Cheers Can't you slide the seat back like a 172? --- Mark I have some long ago hours in an Aerobat and at 6' 2" don't remember a problem. The seat went back far enough to accommodate me and a parachute. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Flaps_50!" wrote in message ... On Dec 14, 12:27 pm, Mark wrote: Think I'll see if I can squeeze into a 152 Aerobat in the morning. I'm 6' 3". Think I'll fit? I ain't flying bent over! The problem is fitting your legs under the instruemnt panel... Legroom should not be an issue. However, payload capacity for two 2009-standard-issue pilots can be a problem for any 150 series Cessna. We need more jockey-sized CFIs. Vaughn |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 13, 8:10*pm, "vaughn"
wrote: "Flaps_50!" wrote in message ... On Dec 14, 12:27 pm, Mark wrote: Think I'll see if I can squeeze into a 152 Aerobat in the morning. I'm 6' 3". Think I'll fit? I ain't flying bent over! The problem is fitting your legs under the instruemnt panel... Legroom should not be an issue. *However, payload capacity for two 2009-standard-issue pilots can be a problem for any 150 series Cessna. *We need more jockey-sized CFIs. Vaughn I'm a lean, mean 205. The plane's owner is coming along, and I've not met him before but I gotta think he can't be too heavy if he flys an aerobat. --- Mark |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mark" wrote in message
... Think I'll see if I can squeeze into a 152 Aerobat in the morning. I'm 6' 3". Think I'll fit? I ain't flying bent over! --- Mark I'm only 6'1" and the problem that I had in both the Cessna 150 and Cessna 152 was vision to the side. I had to bend way over to see under the door and window frames--especially for any pesty little details like other traffic. Peter |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mark" wrote in message ... Think I'll see if I can squeeze into a 152 Aerobat in the morning. I'm 6' 3". Think I'll fit? I ain't flying bent over! I learned in a 150, and my instructor was 6' 2" and probably about 240. He fit. I thought all Aerobats were 150s. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 02:38:40 -0500, Jeffrey Bloss wrote:
On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 01:23:30 GMT, Mark wrote: On Dec 13, 8:10*pm, "vaughn" wrote: "Flaps_50!" wrote in message On Dec 14, 12:27 pm, Mark wrote: Think I'll see if I can squeeze into a 152 Aerobat in the morning. I'm 6' 3". Think I'll fit? I ain't flying bent over! The problem is fitting your legs under the instruemnt panel. Legroom should not be an issue. *However, payload capacity for two 2009-standard-issue pilots can be a problem for any 150 series Cessna. *We need more jockey-sized CFIs. Vaughn I'm a lean, mean 205. The plane's owner is coming along, and I've not met him before but I gotta think he can't be too heavy if he flys an aerobat. 205 in a 152! Hah hah. You need a Zeppelin. Looks like Mark can supply the helium for free. ![]() |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ęslop wrote:
"Mark" wrote in message ... Think I'll see if I can squeeze into a 152 Aerobat in the morning. I'm 6' 3". Think I'll fit? I ain't flying bent over! I learned in a 150, and my instructor was 6' 2" and probably about 240. He fit. I thought all Aerobats were 150s. All 150s are stall/spin recovery capable - and they have even been known to do a gentle barrel roll - in the hands of someone who knows a coupla things. There again: 150's have come back with a rudder pivot loose and missing bolts, wrinkled skins etc., etc, in the hands of thrill-seekers. Brian W |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Rolling a Non Aerobat 150 | Tom Inglima | Piloting | 39 | December 21st 08 02:04 PM |
Rolling a Non Aerobat 150 | Tom Inglima | Aerobatics | 34 | December 21st 08 02:04 PM |
Rolling a Non Aerobat 150 | Tom Inglima | Owning | 4 | March 1st 07 01:44 AM |
Rolling a Non Aerobat 150 | Tom Inglima | Instrument Flight Rules | 4 | March 1st 07 01:44 AM |
aerobat | Silent Bob. | Aerobatics | 2 | October 24th 04 11:46 AM |