![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I inquired if the annual program letter could be emailed instead of
faxed to the local FSDO in Teterboro, NJ. Initially they said that a signed, scanned letter could be emailed, then the "big boss" decided that it could not be emailed and, in fact, could not be faxed, but an original must be mailed in order for it "to be legal." Would sure be great if SSA could undertake discussions with the FAA about getting rid of the requirement for program letters for gliders altogether. Seems like a lot of wasted energy and taxpayer dollars with little or no benefit. cheers, Paul |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It appears that the local FSDOs make their own policy with regard to
this. I and others have sent our program letters to the Houston FSDO via scan attached to email and they were perfectly happy with it. Davikd |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 9, 1:01*pm, villinski wrote:
I inquired if the annual program letter could be emailed instead of faxed to the local FSDO in Teterboro, NJ. Initially they said that a signed, scanned letter could be emailed, then the "big boss" decided that it could not be emailed and, in fact, could not be faxed, but an original must be mailed in order for it "to be legal." Would sure be great if SSA could undertake discussions with the FAA about getting rid of the requirement for program letters for gliders altogether. Seems like a lot of wasted energy and taxpayer dollars with little or no benefit. cheers, Paul Invest in the stamp. Program letters aren't going away any time soon. There is a long history that reflects the FAA position that they are accomodating us and this is the price we pay for such accomodation. Yes- it is a waste. UH |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 9, 11:01*am, villinski wrote:
I inquired if the annual program letter could be emailed instead of faxed to the local FSDO in Teterboro, NJ. Initially they said that a signed, scanned letter could be emailed, then the "big boss" decided that it could not be emailed and, in fact, could not be faxed, but an original must be mailed in order for it "to be legal." Would sure be great if SSA could undertake discussions with the FAA about getting rid of the requirement for program letters for gliders altogether. Seems like a lot of wasted energy and taxpayer dollars with little or no benefit. cheers, Paul Just so the example program form letter I presented is confusing, the original program letter for the year is mailed, amendments may be faxed. Frank Whiteley |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 9, 3:01*pm, Frank Whiteley wrote:
Just so the example program form letter I presented is confusing, the original program letter for the year is mailed, amendments may be faxed. Do you mail it certified with return receipt? At least with a FAX I get a delivery confirmation, and so far no complaints from SDL FSDO. Andy |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 9, 3:34*pm, Andy wrote:
On Feb 9, 3:01*pm, Frank Whiteley wrote: Just so the example program form letter I presented is confusing, the original program letter for the year is mailed, amendments may be faxed. Do you mail it certified with return receipt? At least with a FAX I get a delivery confirmation, and so far no complaints from SDL FSDO. Andy Haven't, but you can now get Delivery Confirmation service also. A bit cheaper than certified. Frank |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The FAA has nothing on the USPTO when it comes to faxes.
http://tinyurl.com/yanesuv Washington DC: 61 square miles surrounded by reality. -Evan Ludeman / T8 |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Would somebody be so kind as to show or copy paste an example of a
program letter? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here's mine, specifics deleted to protect the innocent.
Schleicher ASWXX, Serial Number 12345, NXXXXX This Glider/Sailplane is certificated in the Experimental Classification for Exhibition/Air Racing. The Modified Operating Limitations require that a list of proposed events to be attended be submitted to your office yearly. The aircraft is planned to be flown in the following scheduled events during 2010: 1. Region 5 Contest, Perry, SC, 19 Apr – 24 Apr, 2010 2. Region 10 Contest, Cherry Valley, AR, 24 May – 29 May, 2010 3. Sports Class Nationals, Parowan, UT, 15 Jun – 24 Jun, 2010 4. 15M Nationals, Uvalde, TX, 3 Aug – 12 Aug, 2010 5. Region 4 South Contest, New Castle, VA, 20 Sep – 25 Sep, 2010 6. Region 4 North Contest, Fairfield, PA, 10 Oct – 16 Oct, 2010 7. Attempts at World, National and State Soaring records recognized by the Federation Aeronautique Internationale (FAI) and the Soaring Society of America (SSA). 8. Proficiency and practice flights as prescribed in FAA Order 8130.2f. Sincerely, |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The "received fax" is processed electronically, converted to PDF or similar
file, it is not printed, and then routed through internal email to be processed. A lot of this happens automatically, no human intervention. We have this system at work, but it will process upside down pdf files and email them. BT "T8" wrote in message ... The FAA has nothing on the USPTO when it comes to faxes. http://tinyurl.com/yanesuv Washington DC: 61 square miles surrounded by reality. -Evan Ludeman / T8 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS:Original Glasflugel 304 | Pete Russell | Soaring | 0 | March 5th 06 11:58 PM |
Sample annual program letter | Noel Luneau | Soaring | 2 | January 8th 05 06:45 PM |
G-1: which is considered "the original" | Kai Glaesner | Piloting | 4 | November 27th 04 05:25 AM |
The original Boeing 727 | Chris | Piloting | 11 | May 23rd 04 07:30 PM |
Original F-117 Sketch | robert arndt | Military Aviation | 13 | February 18th 04 02:52 AM |