![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 5, 10:28*am, Greg Arnold wrote:
On 4/5/2010 1:27 AM, Jip wrote: *wrote in message ... Also, on a more general note: Some canopy materials have bad interactions with polarized lenses. When I was training in a Diamond DA-20 I made the mistake of wearing polarized lenses once and was treated to a wonderful changing moire pattern all over the canopy, as I turned my head - ugh! So check your canopy as well as your PDA, before you drop a lot of dough on fancy lenses! --Noel And last but not least, with polarized lenses reflections are suppressed. That means that you easely miss a sun reflection in the cannopy of an other glider. Missing other traffic means an increased risk of collission. No polarized glasses for me in the cokpit!! It is possible that you might miss a sun reflection on a glider. However, polarized gliders make the sky much darker, so in general they make other gliders stand out. *They also help with the visibility of distant clouds. I wear a blue blocking polarized lens. The combination of blue blocking and polarizing significantly darkens large parts of the sky makes white gliders stand out and increases cloud contrast greatly, making wisps and haze domes visible as well. The downside is color shifts that may affect things like field choices in landouts in some situations, but you get used to this quickly. Moire patterns from stress in canopy can be a problem sometimes but with all the Meccaplex canopies I've flown with I have never seen a problem with this. One particular side window in my Tundra is another issue. Some powered aircraft windows with complex coumpount curvatures may be worse than glider canopies. Having a really good pair of sunglasses also cuts down on eye stain and makes you more likely to see other aircraft. The old chestnut about speculative reflection and it's importance in detecting other aircraft keeps coming up, the scientific report often cited for this is far from convincing. Darryl |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 6, 10:13*pm, Darryl Ramm wrote:
On Apr 5, 10:28*am, Greg Arnold wrote: On 4/5/2010 1:27 AM, Jip wrote: *wrote in message .... Also, on a more general note: Some canopy materials have bad interactions with polarized lenses. When I was training in a Diamond DA-20 I made the mistake of wearing polarized lenses once and was treated to a wonderful changing moire pattern all over the canopy, as I turned my head - ugh! So check your canopy as well as your PDA, before you drop a lot of dough on fancy lenses! --Noel And last but not least, with polarized lenses reflections are suppressed. That means that you easely miss a sun reflection in the cannopy of an other glider. Missing other traffic means an increased risk of collission. No polarized glasses for me in the cokpit!! It is possible that you might miss a sun reflection on a glider. However, polarized gliders make the sky much darker, so in general they make other gliders stand out. *They also help with the visibility of distant clouds. I wear a blue blocking polarized lens. The combination of blue blocking and polarizing significantly darkens large parts of the sky makes white gliders stand out and increases cloud contrast greatly, making wisps and haze domes visible as well. The downside is color shifts that may affect things like field choices in landouts in some situations, but you get used to this quickly. Moire patterns from stress in canopy can be a problem sometimes but with all the Meccaplex canopies I've flown with I have never seen a problem with this. One particular side window in my Tundra is another issue. Some powered aircraft windows with complex coumpount curvatures may be worse than glider canopies. Having a really good pair of sunglasses also cuts down on eye stain and makes you more likely to see other aircraft. The old chestnut about speculative reflection and it's importance in detecting other aircraft keeps coming up, the scientific report often cited for this is far from convincing. Darryl- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I have a pair of Oakley's with black iridium lenses, nonpolorized, I believe they make that lens in both. I find them to be not dark enough on blue days in the Southwest, even though they are supposedly the darkest lens Oakley makes. I can see my 4700 IPAQ fine through them. I like them, it's a pleasing accurate lens, just wish they were darker. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 4, 8:47*pm, Michael Reid wrote:
Has anyone had problems seeing their PDA while flying with Polarized lenses? It's very iffy, and I wouldn't do it. My iPhone, iPad, camera LCDs and Garmin G1000 all go dark at some angles when I wear polarized sunglasses. I fly with non-polarized glasses for this very reason. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Seeking 2 Compaq Aero 1550 PDAs | Paul Remde | Soaring | 0 | November 13th 09 09:26 PM |
Non-polarized blue-blocker (orange) clip-ons/flip-ups? | Frank[_1_] | Soaring | 3 | September 28th 07 05:30 PM |
Carrying glasses? | Emily | Piloting | 58 | September 13th 06 12:27 AM |
Polarized Instrument Display | Rick | Soaring | 14 | May 14th 06 02:22 PM |
More on Sunreader glasses | Eric Greenwell | Soaring | 0 | September 22nd 03 11:38 PM |