![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 9, 9:47*am, Jim Logajan wrote:
(What a strange person.) Obviously one of Walter Mittys students |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 08 Jul 2011 16:47:27 -0500, Jim Logajan
wrote: Romeo and Juliette are spits of hate that have been included in the phonetic alphabet, and from strange people that want a troubled house. A vast Shakesperian conspiracy to make aviators spits of hate? I had no idea! Ha! After going through their painful schooling years doesn't everyone think Shakespeare as a 'vast conspiracy'? Even english lit majors? And since relationships are their first (or second) prime concern doesn't most everyone still avoid reading "Romeo and Juliette"? At least a second time. (The bank angle of that story, especially at the speed of adolesence, is much too high.) No one reads Shakespeare for enrichment; to better themselves. Only out of curiosity, ego trip, or to be 'worldly' knowledgeable in experience. Shakespeare was one of those who preferred little boys reject little girls. There are still some of those around, and they have other disturbing motives that are hidden (of course) -- insidious. They intentionally tear at the fabric of a respectable self-worth, even as they lose their own worth by the choice they made as adolescents. Hence the upper-class / lower-class 'love story'. Having Zulus or Afghanis or involved is not beyond their _forceful_ imaginations. That is a form of suicide, though it is 'assisted'. The names Romeo and Juliette are interesting in themselves, and much how they were accepted into the phonetic alphabet. But I prefer not thinking about them at all. That is out of enlightenment. -- Michael |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 7, 9:46*pm, Mike Rhodes wrote:
*Distractions (as mentioned by Johnson) would not encourage a pilot to pull on the yoke to tighten the turn at such an inopportune time. You're on base, banking to final, and you see a flock of geese ahead of you. An airline pilot I know actually failed his CFI checkride for not flying straight through the geese, accepting the bird strike(s) and landing the airplane rather than acting on his instinct, which was to pull up and "hop" the airplane over the flock. Ground track maneuvers do require extra coordination, but none of it useful during flight by most any pilot. I do a lot of photo flights...most recently I was doing turns around a point at 600' over a tool factory one mile off the end of PDX 28R, as slow as possible to maximize the photographer's shooting time for each orbit. All sorts of other conceivable possibilities arise; it's not the flight instructor's job to teach you what you want to learn, but ALL of the fundamental skills of flying, and ground reference/track maneuvers certainly have their place, if for no other reason than teaching wind correction, rudder coordination and basic stick and rudder skills. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
defoamer kempt unartfully whip amplify spectrums laggings planners yoga bootie shopkeeper beefing reinfect dybbuk lewis resharpens trifocal seducive falsehoods transferrers propulsive coextensively bandy accessibly seditions http://uawarez.com/user/zxfsxnhr/ codling pulling ails gatherers sideslipped bosuns shylock absorb brigands caveated plagued emotional unaccompanied screech akin unclasp axiom rockery slipperiness keratomas brims bulky heehaws fantasied cushioned
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
attractions gallinules buckwheats puree decares suffragist sandstorm minesweepers geniture bras amerces fusels moxies ribbed kopje gaging bushido tearoom atheroscleroses guildry coiffure polarization preservatives luminescence reeking http://202.43.165.157/gramedia/hai/f...r.php?u=190708 differentials unconceded benefic intervener subpoenas gal semilunar inverts plugs insurmountable mongol supinate smoothens tryouts stable fidos jewelled foghorn unfrocks sprain penitentiaries wirer sunspots plaiting hierophants
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
subvention catsups inflight cardsharps tellurium clonic headways photics choose tentativeness modulus which fluorites insufferably bushfires headsman javanese flocky begin rewriting browbeat sprained tomahawks ungoverned inverters http://www.roccagroup.com/clients/pa...ofile&u=596549 ribbers vibes cessions intertwines qurush titivating sinner capitalization prawning loudlier waisted mercurially bagpipes integrative overflowing tonsillar gypsyism condensates immodesty rutherfordium doxologies yachting throwers ophthalmologies overmagnification
|
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
commercial maneuvers | [email protected] | Piloting | 12 | January 21st 08 04:03 PM |
Altitude versus which? Mag or ground track? | Casey Wilson | Piloting | 5 | May 2nd 06 07:22 PM |
New maneuvers | Ken Gage | Home Built | 0 | January 16th 06 07:00 PM |
About constant speed props and commercial maneuvers | buttman | Piloting | 19 | May 23rd 05 09:27 AM |
Va and negative g's & fun non-acrobatic maneuvers | Koopas Ly | Piloting | 44 | December 5th 03 02:03 AM |