![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
![]() BUFDRVR wrote: Why do you start #4 & #5 first? The sequence is; #4 then #5, then the rest. You could use #3 or #6 to start as well, I'm guessing they just picked #4 because they needed to pick an inboard engine and #4 was the closest to the watchful eyes of the Aircraft Commander (I'm not really sure why they picked #4 out of the 4 they could have?) You want to use inboard engines because the bleed air manifold connecting to the outboard engines is only designed to have cooled air blown into it, not hot air out of it. Basically, if you start #8, then run up #8 to start the rest, you can over temp the "plumbing" leading from the #8 engine. Same is true for #1, #2 and #7. On occasions, the manifold for one of the outboard engines will stick open after the switch has been placed to CLOSED and either during the anti-ice check, or initial takeoff you'll get a manifold overheat light. The bad part is, you have no idea which engine and have to go through a little "trial and error" to figure out which engine is the criminal. On takeoff the light comes on immediately upon turning the air conditioning on (somewhere prior to 10,000'). BUFDRVR "Stay on the bomb run boys, I'm gonna get those bomb doors open if it harelips everyone on Bear Creek" So all the engines are all "plumbed" together? As long as one of the 8 is running, you can send "starting air" to the others (within the limits you mentioned.)? Starting is all with bleed air, no electric motors? Given all this complexity, why was an APU not fitted? It would not seem to add much to the plumbing. Is this due to the general plan of a large AFB with lots of handy ground techs and their equipment running around? Bob McKellar |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
So all the engines are all "plumbed" together?
Yes. As long as one of the 8 is running, you can send "starting air" to the others (within the limits you mentioned.)? Yes. Starting is all with bleed air, no electric motors? The starters ("spark") are DC, but initial engine rotation is provided by bleed air. Given all this complexity, why was an APU not fitted? Are there any jets built before 1962 that have APUs? Did the Comet have an APU? If the answer is yes to either of those, my only guess would be, to save weight, they did without the APU. Hell, they took the G model's and H model's ailerons off to save weight. BUFDRVR "Stay on the bomb run boys, I'm gonna get those bomb doors open if it harelips everyone on Bear Creek" |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sure...and just about anyone who starts a/c engines can say the
same...fireguards are a waste of time... Well, I for one was always glad to have one when we were starting an bombed up, fueled up F-4 using the cartridge start system. It was always a relief to see that the world was still there after the black/red smoke cloud cleared. A few got burned up to the wheels on that little operation. Ditto with hot pit refueling. There is/was a gate guard as Davis-Monthan AFB that caught fire with a loss of life when the refueling nozzle slipped off and raw JP4 got sucked into the inlet on #1, belched flame and caught the pool of fuel under the jet on fire. Backseater jumped out the left side of the plane as was the usual route, right into the flame. If he had gone the right side or over the nose as the fronst seater did he wold have survived. |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
there is another way to start the engines as well. the Starter cartridges
placed in the engine starter fires from battery power and propels the engines to motor up. it was use on alerts. and a bitch to clean up after an exercise. we would put two on # 4 & #5 engines for a normal alert status, and a cart in all eight engines for a quick start alert. "BUFDRVR" wrote in message ... So all the engines are all "plumbed" together? Yes. As long as one of the 8 is running, you can send "starting air" to the others (within the limits you mentioned.)? Yes. Starting is all with bleed air, no electric motors? The starters ("spark") are DC, but initial engine rotation is provided by bleed air. Given all this complexity, why was an APU not fitted? Are there any jets built before 1962 that have APUs? Did the Comet have an APU? If the answer is yes to either of those, my only guess would be, to save weight, they did without the APU. Hell, they took the G model's and H model's ailerons off to save weight. BUFDRVR "Stay on the bomb run boys, I'm gonna get those bomb doors open if it harelips everyone on Bear Creek" |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
During the First Gulf War, the 4300 PBW at Diego Garcia was using G model
BUFFs, and Navy JP5 fuel. it was easier to tell the crew to expect a hot start on all eight engines, and then tell them when one does not hot start. Also on the first night of air operations we had a bomber with an outboard hydro leak behind the jet blast of #1and 2 engines. the Hydro fluid caught fire as it was dripping down and the ground around the wing started to burn. I was on the plane next door and saw this rushed over with the fire bottle. the fire guard or the ground man did not see it. also while on alert I had a bad Cartridge start, flames shot out of the starter exhaust duct then caught some fuel in the cowling on fire. My crew was very happy the I was alert that day. with all those warheads onboard, it could have been a mess. fire guards had a job, but prey that they never have to use it. Plus you want one that can keep his mind on what he is doing. "Smartace11" wrote in message ... Sure...and just about anyone who starts a/c engines can say the same...fireguards are a waste of time... Well, I for one was always glad to have one when we were starting an bombed up, fueled up F-4 using the cartridge start system. It was always a relief to see that the world was still there after the black/red smoke cloud cleared. A few got burned up to the wheels on that little operation. Ditto with hot pit refueling. There is/was a gate guard as Davis-Monthan AFB that caught fire with a loss of life when the refueling nozzle slipped off and raw JP4 got sucked into the inlet on #1, belched flame and caught the pool of fuel under the jet on fire. Backseater jumped out the left side of the plane as was the usual route, right into the flame. If he had gone the right side or over the nose as the fronst seater did he wold have survived. |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
and a cart in all eight engines for a quick start alert.
I was actually lucky enough to get to do an 8 engine cart start one afternoon. ACC was testing new respirators for the crew chiefs, so they picked my jet to load 8 carts on. It was very cool and I was very surprised at the amount of smoke, it seemed much more than four times what I was used to. BUFDRVR "Stay on the bomb run boys, I'm gonna get those bomb doors open if it harelips everyone on Bear Creek" |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
nope, Sevice Dress (haven't heard the term Class A's since the 80's and even
then it was outdated) ![]() Sorry for the top post...bad habit ![]() "B2431" wrote in message ... From: "Gord Beaman" ) "Tex Houston" wrote: "BUFDRVR" wrote in message ... I've been on active duty for 12 years and I'm wearing (in one combination or another) my fourth service dress! Yeah, that's what we always heard too, about bomber pilots, and navigators. Jack You were asking for that one Buf!... ![]() OK, I'm going to admit, I don't get it!! I always appreciate humor, someone clue me in ....... BUFDRVR One word...dress. I was funny but not when it has to be explained. Tex ...and it's a sure sign that you've been 'in too long' when the phrase 'service dress' doesn't sound a little 'iffy' to you! ![]() -- -Gord. Don't they call them "class A" anymore? Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "John Keeney" wrote in message ... "WaltBJ" wrote in message BTW what is the uniform allowance now - still 2 bucks a month? Walt BJ Heck no, over $200 a year....but when you look at the costs of the uniforms (Battle Dress and Service Dress)....astronomical. -- Pup USAF, Retired Go #88 UPS Racing, Detroit Red Wings, Ohio State Buckeyes __________________ |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"John Keeney" wrote in message ...
"WaltBJ" wrote in message m... Change the uniforms again? Jesus X Christ! What's wrong with these guys' brains? They get up to CoS and all of sudden they think - "Hey, it's time to change the uniform!" I forget the name of the jerk who "Hire somebody, fire somebody and paint the lobby." Was the advice I heard for taking an upper management job. Since the entire Air Force can't see you changed the color of the lobby they think they need to change the uniform to prove they're in charge. sigh professional managers sigh Gen. Jumper already did that. He's done a lot of shaking up in last couple years. The AEF concept, Fit to Fight, and some other programs are big in that they affect everyone in the AF. He's pretty much done the "prove they're in charge" |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Boeing Boondoggle | Larry Dighera | Military Aviation | 77 | September 15th 04 02:39 AM |
Highest-Ranking Black Air Force General Credits Success to Hard Work | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | February 10th 04 11:06 PM |
us air force us air force academy us air force bases air force museum us us air force rank us air force reserve adfunk | Jehad Internet | Military Aviation | 0 | February 7th 04 04:24 AM |
Air Force Uniform Envy | Thomas Schoene | Military Aviation | 35 | August 11th 03 02:04 AM |
Air Force unveils new uniform plan | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 1 | August 9th 03 08:32 AM |